the photo was taken from the Russian-language post "Qualification of Internet cheaters" from Oleg Solomakha
Qualification of Internet cheaters
What a hard worldKvalifikatsiya internet-chiterov ot Oleg Solomakha:
1. Chitery-neudachniki, ili chitery-chayniki.
Lyudi, kotoryye malo ponimayut v chiterstve i v osnovnoy masse slaboigrayushchiye samostoyatel'no. Obychno eto te, kto nasmotrelsya sovetov na yutube, kak nado chiterit', i sleduyut etim sovetam besprekoslovno. Otlichayutsya igroy chisto po 1 linii, ravnym vremennym zatratam kak na razmeny, tak i na feyerichnyye kombinatsii. Obychno takikh lovit' proshche vsego, tak kak statistika v blits i pulyu raznitsya u takikh kardinal'no. V osnovnom imenno takikh lovit arbitrazh na Vegase.
Protsent veroyatnosti poimki - 90%
2. Cunning cheaters
People who understand something about cheating and are mostly qualified. In an effort to be better than others, they cheat, but they cheat very cunningly. For example, there are those who play not on line 1, but on line 2-5, while the assessment of the position practically does not change, that is, they are not mistaken. Cunning cheaters can bring the advantage to a decisive one and finish the game on their own; They can make mistakes on purpose, but so that the assessment does not swing sharply in the other direction. It is very difficult to catch such people, since it is very, very difficult to prove anything. Again, due to qualifications, the difference between blitz and bullet is not particularly great.
Catch probability percentage - 30%
3. Ace cheaters
People who understand the cheating process very well and understand the difference between human and computer games. It is almost impossible to catch such people. Basically, everyone is a qualified chess player. They alternate good moves with moves that do not fall into the first lines, they do not make stupid mistakes with timing - they think about starting a combination, after which there is a series of forced fast moves. Their game looks completely human and it is simply unrealistic to prove that such a person is a cheater. For example, ace cheaters rename processes that can give them away, since on some sites, in particular ShP, the player’s processes are monitored during the game.For such people there are no prohibitions - they can bypass any bans, in the computer world they ate the dog.
Possibility of capture process - 1%
As we see, anything can be proven only in the first case and much less often in the second. In most cases, it is simply impossible to prove the guilt of fraudsters. You can only be guided by your “inner feeling” that something is wrong here. For example, ask the suspect what did he win in real life? And if a person has not grabbed the stars from the sky, but is tearing everyone apart on the Internet, then there is reason to be wary. In general, this is an extensive topic for discussion - write your thoughts about cheaters, it will be interesting to read other points of view.
Everything you read was translated from a Russian post about Oleg Solomakha
THIS BLOG HAS BEEN TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH
Discuss this blog post in the forum
melkopupsiik
melkopupsiik
melkopupsiik
