Uniform timing drew attention to this game

White made a streak of inaccuracies, and Black played solid chess to secure the win.

If you're trying to accuse someone of cheating, use https://lichess.org/report.

The timing was not uniform and white kinda gave away all the material, nothing special here.
Even if black eventually cheated white played bad and deserved the loss what is the point? Just chill not everyone is there to get you by cheating

The game was shown because of the "Blue" move time "line" and how gradual it was.

How about dropping the unhealthy mind set and stop looking for faults.
You did not even give a chance for the forum subject to begin.
Talk about the game in a positive way.

Look at the time management skills that the blue line shows. Try to beat that blue line.
Only 4 moves went above the blue line and another one touched the line, but that's still fine.

Did you notice that there was a cascade of 7 inaccuracies? When does that happen? Not often.
That's another reason to show off the game.

A promotion with a checkmate, we do not see many of them either.

See these thumbs down. Take note of the members doing it. You will see the hate pattern.
I don't hate them, I see it as childish behaviour.

@Toscani said ^

That's another reason to show off the game.

I need to claim the fifth, I have no clue about the blue line you are talking about, what I know is if you play the game move by move the clock shows the timings, most of them was 1s, a few were premoves and some moves toke longer than 2/3 seconds, those are natural human timings. Not saying that is proof that someone didn't cheat, but it definitely isn't proof that someone cheated.
7 inaccuracies? Just looking at the game white is playing a very old system colle zukertort for many stronger players dxc5 is almost resignation not because it immediately loses material, but because the move makes no sense and is counterproductive for white plan and position. After that, one blunder followed another, white gave no chances for black to go wrong. It's not nice at all accusing someone of cheating like that specially because you were facing a much stronger opponent it's easy to go wrong after early blunder like dxc5

The subject is not about cheating? Is that understood. The game is not even me playing it. It was a special game and you all are slander it into a cheating subject. Stop that. That's not nice. The forum is about game analysis. Not about cheating.

Look how things can turn real fast with perfect play.

Look at that gradual blue line dropping and leaving extra time for the end game without leaving too much time.
The over all time management was well paced out. White's blue line is levelling out while blacks blue line is more uniform with a constant decline. It's must be hard for white to maintain a near level line without increment time. From move 34 to 60 it was a lost game with just about only only mates (#) in the move sheet. The game could of ended earlier but one refused to resign and the other player missed all those mates.

"See these thumbs down. [...] I see it as childish behaviour."

Said the person who downvoted everyone who disagreed with them. Totally not ironic.

@Toscani said ^

Look how things can turn real fast with perfect play.

Screenshot_20260729_000013-1.png (https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&h=0&op=resize&path=gBd2e-fGwd_g.png&w=864&sig=64b1af160fba5963bdea963c9eb75620ef8eb829)

Look at that gradual blue line dropping and leaving extra time for the end game without leaving too much time.
The over all time management was well paced out. White's blue line...

@Toscani you can't be serious what is uniform here? Both sides have short and long turns. Additionally this is a game with an incredible rating gap, if I'm playing 600 points down I'll get 100% accuracy easily.

Also is this is public shaming? Are you implying foul play? What is your point?