I prefer UltraBullet. I mean, I love both of them but UltraBullet have more action. It gives you adrenaline but it's disadvantage is just it makes me angry when I lose on time when my opponent has <1 seconds.
Let me get your answers!
To me the question feels a bit like being asked whether I prefer fried mice or steamed mice. I don't eat mice and don't intend to start.
Please forgive me if I hurt your feelings with this comparison, but I wanted to show clearly how that choice looks to me.
At the same time, I have no problem with other people having different tastes.
@ILikeBlitz your name says it. I understand you. There's no problem bro
Ultra pro's: it farms arena much faster, and the rating is far lower than bullet, hence it's almost meaningless
@Cedur216 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/2I7BADwg)
> Ultra pro's: it farms arena much faster, and the rating is far lower than bullet, hence it's almost meaningless
Meaningless?
Yes for myself I don't care if my ultrabullet is 1800, 1850 or 1900 while I do definitely care whether my bullet rating is in the 2100s or 2200s
@Kaan_Burak said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Nq0z1SO8)
> I prefer UltraBullet. I mean, I love both of them but UltraBullet have more action. It gives you adrenaline but it's disadvantage is just it makes me angry when I lose on time when my opponent has <1 seconds.
>
> Let me get your answers!
In my opinion losses where your opponent has <1 seconds are the most fun losses
Honestly, ultra. When I play bullet, I usually play slower than hyperbullet. Hyperbullet is easier than both bullet and ultra, it's not really a test of skill. (Ultra skill is not chess skill, but it's still an engaging skill). So for me it would be: bullet > ultra > hyperbullet.
@StevenEmily said [^](/forum/redirect/post/hiUpwzB3)
> In my opinion losses where your opponent has <1 seconds are the most fun losses
It can, but it doesn't makes me fun when it's laggy lol
Ultrabullet. I don't like hyperbullet because I am used to 1+0 bullet. 1/2+0 for me, maybe easily flagged.
Neither.