THE best training ratio?

hello, guys ive always wondered what is the best training ratio for calculation: strategy : endgames note that guess the move games or analyzing master games comes under strategy and tactics does under calculation

The largest part (50%) should be play and analysis of your own lost games.
Then (30%) comes study of annotated grandmaster games.
Then (20%) comes endgame study.

There is no "best training ratio". Everyone is different. Work on your weakest area, be it tactical sight, positional understanding, endgames, imbalances, or whatever, and don't forget to play and analyse (because that's how you learn which area you're weak in).

@tpr said ^

The largest part (50%) should be play and analysis of your own lost games.

um thas a problem for me i play one 60+30 or 90+30 game a week and anlyse it so the game is 3h and analyse it for roughly 2h20-2h45 which is less proportion for my training chedule i have kept a 2:1:`1 ratio for calulcation,startgy ,endgame is that fine @tpr

@tpr said ^

The largest part (50%) should be play and analysis of your own lost games.
Then (30%) comes study of annotated grandmaster games.
Then (20%) comes endgame study.

what do you think in each secton i either do puzzles related to it /read a book , i have one guess the moves session a weak which counts as strategy which i get it done from https://qchess.net/guessthemovelobby what do you think @tpr i have 34-36 hours a week for chess and i installed some safeguards n my plan in order to not crash outt/expereince neural fatigue

"i play one 60+30 or 90+30 game a week and anlyse it "

• That is fine. There are practical constraints.
  You can fill in with analysis of annotated grandmaster games.

is one gues the move session per week to low? which is around two hours @tpr

heres a closer look i have 34-36h a week for chess

"puzzles"

• Puzzles are overrated. Solving 4 puzzles before you play is a good warm-up, but that is about it.
  In a real game nobody tells you there is a tactic, or for whom.
  The puzzle does not teach you how to get at that position either.

"read a book"

• Chess books are no novels, you do not read them, but study them like a math book.
  The core of any chess book are annotated grandmaster games.

"i have 34-36 hours a week"

• That is a lot.
  As per your limitation to 1 game 60+30 or 90+30 per week, that would lead to
  3-4 hours of play + 3-4 hours of analysis in case of a loss
  21 hours study of annotated grandmaster games
  7 hours of endgame study

@tpr said ^

"read a book"

okay, yeah obviolsu y i mean solving them in the board and looking into it deeply let me genrate you a quick routine and sources of mine on how i do my training
this is excluding games ie 3h+2h30 you may not know seom of these sites but i use them for spaced repition training in tactics and woodpecker,hers how i train my tactics @tpr

sources for others :

https://chessalyz.ai/trainers
https://chessalyz.ai/openings-study
https://www.tacticspecker.com/solve
https://www.kingchess.io/woodpecker
https://www.kingchess.io/train
https://qchess.net/donthangyourpieces
https://qchess.net/guessthemovelobby
https://qchess.net/studies
https://lichess.org/insights/SF18NNUE-SFNNV12/accuracy/variant
https://lichess.org/study
https://lichess.org/training
https://lipuzzle.brendel.xyz/
https://chess-endgame-trainer.mooo.com/?fullscreen=true
https://flawchess.com
https://taketaketake.com
https://videos.chessbase.com/en/
https://youtube.com

sites i use for training