The question..
The question..
The question..
It could range from 1800-2100
Why not play some rapid games and find out?
@AsDaGo said in #3:
Why not play some rapid games and find out?
I want to work on my fundamentals, not waste time with the rating game as it can be very detrimental to progress
@Puzzleandlearning said in #4:
I want to work on my fundamentals, not waste time with the rating game as it can be very detrimental to progress
Ok, but playing and analyzing games is an important part of improvement. It doesn't mean you have to be obsessed about rating.
@AsDaGo said in #5:
Ok, but playing and analyzing games is an important part of improvement. It doesn't mean you have to be obsessed about rating.
Very good point. I play some games from time to time :) but in my case i was too obsessed about the rating so i had to stop for a bit
@Puzzleandlearning said in #6:
Very good point. I play some games from time to time :) but in my case i was too obsessed about the rating so i had to stop for a bit
Fair enough. Good luck in your chess journey.
Maybe check out chessable.com for free courses on tactics and such. Play in simuls with high rated players...etc.
From my limited experience lichess puzzle ratings are usually 200-400 points higher than the actual rating.
But I'm sure there are circonstances where you can push your puzzle rating way above the +400 points, it's really inaccurate and it only measures your calculation abilities. One can very well be a tactical genius while lacking everywhere else or the opposite and have his opening preparation and positional understanding compensate quite a bit.
@Hitsugaya said in #9:
From my limited experience lichess puzzle ratings are usually 200-400 points higher than the actual rating.
But I'm sure there are circonstances where you can push your puzzle rating way above the +400 points, it's really inaccurate and it only measures your calculation abilities. One can very well be a tactical genius while lacking everywhere else or the opposite and have his opening preparation and positional understanding compensate quite a bit.
Interesting, thanks for the insight!
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.