Caution: This is 2^2 instead of 2 + 2 or 2 x 2.
So... what does 2^2 make?
It’s still the same...
@TitusPlaysChess123 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/fFddvrpk)
> Caution: This is 2^2 instead of 2 + 2 or 2 x 2.
>
> So... what does 2^2 make?
4
@RAybonto said [^](/forum/redirect/post/3CPeEu5s)
> 1000004383.jpg (https://image.lichess1.org/display?op=noop&path=rGf7d57OEJox.jpg&sig=043fa8cb95feb8b2176b25dc45dd8251ca5a44f2)
now that’s funny. a laugh enoji just wouldn’t do.
@TitusPlaysChess123 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/fFddvrpk)
> Caution: This is 2^2 instead of 2 + 2 or 2 x 2.
>
> So... what does 2^2 make?
a^b = a × a × a... b times
So 2^2 = 2 × 2
a × b = a+a+a... b times
So 2 × 2 = 2 + 2
And 2 + 2 = 4
So:
2^2 = 4
2^2=2^2
@TitusPlaysChess123 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/fFddvrpk)
> Caution: This is 2^2 instead of 2 + 2 or 2 x 2.
>
> So... what does 2^2 make?
42 because it's the answer to everything, including any math problem!
@TitusPlaysChess123 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/fFddvrpk)
> Caution: This is 2^2 instead of 2 + 2 or 2 x 2.
>
> So... what does 2^2 make?
5, because 4 = 5, so 2^2 = 5 ;p
@AveraWyvern said ^
Caution: This is 2^2 instead of 2 + 2 or 2 x 2.
So... what does 2^2 make?
5, because 4 = 5, so 2^2 = 5 ;p
Since 4 ≠ 5, so 2^2 = 4 (0'''') instead of 5(0'''''). Proofs:
That's obvious that 4 is not same as 5. (一本正经)
@AveraWyvern said [^](/forum/redirect/post/s4QCCwF4)
> > Caution: This is 2^2 instead of 2 + 2 or 2 x 2.
> >
> > So... what does 2^2 make?
>
> 5, because 4 = 5, so 2^2 = 5 ;p
Since 4 ≠ 5, so 2^2 = 4 (0'''') instead of 5(0'''''). Proofs:
That's obvious that 4 is not same as 5. (一本正经)
This topic is now closed.