No Mate with 2 knights?

I thought there was, since there is mate with bishop and knight, but there isn't , why?

@Brutal-baby , and all explain Plz!

There is no checkmate KNN vs. K, but there is checkmate KNN vs. KP.
You should not have captured all pawns, but you need to block his last rook pawn, then drive his king to a corner with K+N, and then approach with the 2nd knight, while his last rook pawn h6 is free to run.
68 Nh5 was a forced checkmate.

wow 119 moves congrats bro :)

@tpr said ^

There is no checkmate KNN vs. K, but there is checkmate KNN vs. KP.
You should not have captured all pawns, but you need to block his last rook pawn, then drive his king to a corner with K+N, and then approach with the 2nd knight, while his last rook pawn h6 is free to run.
68 Nh5 was a forced checkmate.

Thx will do it later

@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 said ^

wow 119 moves congrats bro :)

Yeah Bruh, we all do miracle Games!

@tpr said ^

There is no checkmate KNN vs. K, but there is checkmate KNN vs. KP.
You should not have captured all pawns, but you need to block his last rook pawn, then drive his king to a corner with K+N, and then approach with the 2nd knight, while his last rook pawn h6 is free to run.
68 Nh5 was a forced checkmate.

But it's actually I couldn't do it, SF doesn't sees victory , since there were all pawn alive, I can't lead king to a corner with 1 kinght, and blocking pawn with another , not enought space control, to cut off king there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty-move_rule

@IamNOTamod said ^

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifty-move_rule

Yes I thought about that rule, when only knights left