Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

The French Defense isn't playable

@LiamJoseph2011 said in #70:

Are you suggesting that the french is completely unplayable or that it poses so many problems and diffuculties that it is incredibly impracticle?

That's it's incredibly unpracticable.

I offered an option to start with Nge7 before Qb6 but I guess no one watched my youtube analysis, the engine games in the study that I imported nor the 2700 GM Level Analysis from players like Etienne Bacrot XD

@LiamJoseph2011 said in #70: > Are you suggesting that the french is completely unplayable or that it poses so many problems and diffuculties that it is incredibly impracticle? That's it's incredibly unpracticable. I offered an option to start with Nge7 before Qb6 but I guess no one watched my youtube analysis, the engine games in the study that I imported nor the 2700 GM Level Analysis from players like Etienne Bacrot XD

@loristavernier said in #71:

That's it's incredibly unpracticable.

I offered an option to start with Nge7 before Qb6 but I guess no one watched my youtube analysis, the engine games in the study that I imported nor the 2700 GM Level Analysis from players like Etienne Bacrot XD
Nge7 in which line? Advanced?

@loristavernier said in #71: > That's it's incredibly unpracticable. > > I offered an option to start with Nge7 before Qb6 but I guess no one watched my youtube analysis, the engine games in the study that I imported nor the 2700 GM Level Analysis from players like Etienne Bacrot XD Nge7 in which line? Advanced?

@SarKarlsen17 said in #73:

Nge7 in which line? Advanced?

After Bd3 cxd4. cxd4 and Nge7. If Bd3, cxd4 and 0-0, Nge7 again without Qb6.

@SarKarlsen17 said in #73: > Nge7 in which line? Advanced? After Bd3 cxd4. cxd4 and Nge7. If Bd3, cxd4 and 0-0, Nge7 again without Qb6.

@SarKarlsen17 said in #73:

Nge7 in which line? Advanced?

Don't act smart and ask dubious questions, everything was in the video and in the lichess study.
How dare you comment on something you didn't fully read ?

Kid.

@SarKarlsen17 said in #73: > Nge7 in which line? Advanced? Don't act smart and ask dubious questions, everything was in the video and in the lichess study. How dare you comment on something you didn't fully read ? Kid.

@loristavernier said in #75:

Don't act smart and ask dubious questions, everything was in the video and in the lichess study.
How dare you comment on something you didn't fully read ?

Kid.
Were you taught how to talk to public? I don't appreciate this tone at all. I did not see the video but I read your blog. How rude you are. I never meant to be 'smart' . I just asked the question. You don't have those rights to answer like that!
This is called 'public shaming'

@loristavernier said in #75: > Don't act smart and ask dubious questions, everything was in the video and in the lichess study. > How dare you comment on something you didn't fully read ? > > Kid. Were you taught how to talk to public? I don't appreciate this tone at all. I did not see the video but I read your blog. How rude you are. I never meant to be 'smart' . I just asked the question. You don't have those rights to answer like that! This is called 'public shaming'

This comment section is about the blog, not the video. Do you have a time video ?

This comment section is about the blog, not the video. Do you have a time video ?

@SarKarlsen17 said in #76:

Were you taught how to talk to public? I don't appreciate this tone at all. I did not see the video but I read your blog. How rude you are. I never meant to be 'smart' . I just asked the question. You don't have those rights to answer like that!
This is called 'public shaming'

My bad then, I am replying to everybody at the same time and I misjudged you by reading your messages with the same tone than the others.

Sorry about that.

@SarKarlsen17 said in #76: > Were you taught how to talk to public? I don't appreciate this tone at all. I did not see the video but I read your blog. How rude you are. I never meant to be 'smart' . I just asked the question. You don't have those rights to answer like that! > This is called 'public shaming' My bad then, I am replying to everybody at the same time and I misjudged you by reading your messages with the same tone than the others. Sorry about that.

@Folichon said in #77:

This comment section is about the blog, not the video. Do you have a time video ?

Yes it is, but the discussion in the comment section is about the validity of the french defense - my arguments and analysis are in the study and the video while being introduced in the blog.

@Folichon said in #77: > This comment section is about the blog, not the video. Do you have a time video ? Yes it is, but the discussion in the comment section is about the validity of the french defense - my arguments and analysis are in the study and the video while being introduced in the blog.

@loristavernier said in #80:

So go sleep and never talk to me again.
kindly mind your language.
I criticized your blog. you should defend . instead you are throwing abusive words at me. are you happy?

@loristavernier said in #80: > So go sleep and never talk to me again. kindly mind your language. I criticized your blog. you should defend . instead you are throwing abusive words at me. are you happy?