lichess.org
Donate

can you get increment in a non increment game?

hello
this was a non increment game

https://lichess.org/h4kMFb63JDoi

but on move 7 got an increment pls check
thanks

hello this was a non increment game https://lichess.org/h4kMFb63JDoi but on move 7 got an increment pls check thanks

Your opponent gifted you 15 seconds.

Your opponent gifted you 15 seconds.

@sheckley666 said in #2:

Your opponent gifted you 15 seconds.

this was my first thought too but a closer look to the move times tells something else.
move 6 done black has 2:54 left
move 7 done black has 3:05 left

if the opponent added 15 seconds to the clock of black move 7 should used 4 seconds but its 0 seconds in the move times.
What do i miss here?

@sheckley666 said in #2: > Your opponent gifted you 15 seconds. this was my first thought too but a closer look to the move times tells something else. move 6 done black has 2:54 left move 7 done black has 3:05 left if the opponent added 15 seconds to the clock of black move 7 should used 4 seconds but its 0 seconds in the move times. What do i miss here?

Are move times really tracked separately, or are they just calculated? I would assume that

movetme = max(0, clock_before_move - clock_after_move).

While this is pure speculation on my part, I don't see how tracking clock and move times would be very beneficial, and move times never show up in the pgn.

Are move times really tracked separately, or are they just calculated? I would assume that *movetme = max(0, clock_before_move - clock_after_move)*. While this is pure speculation on my part, I don't see how tracking clock *and* move times would be very beneficial, and move times never show up in the pgn.

@Viohl said in #3:

if the opponent added 15 seconds to the clock of black move 7 should used 4 seconds but its 0 seconds in the move times.
What do i miss here?

You are right and I don't know.

@Viohl said in #3: > if the opponent added 15 seconds to the clock of black move 7 should used 4 seconds but its 0 seconds in the move times. > What do i miss here? You are right and I don't know.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.