Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

Was World War 2 necessary? (Like Americans joining the war?)

America tells they need people. What is happening is they are killing people. Rulers matter. But in WWII context, idk

America tells they need people. What is happening is they are killing people. Rulers matter. But in WWII context, idk

I mean as regard the Nazi regime.
The Third Reich basically.
We went to war after Pearl Harbor got attacked by Japan; Most people at least in America think America was integral in stopping the Germans -- who as we know would not stop if you just say "Stop killing people." -- So the main questions are (In this thread--); was America being involved necessary for the Allies to win-- And, if America had joined the war sooner, would that have caused for less overall deaths?

--Which between WWI or WWII had more deaths:

World War II was far deadlier, resulting in roughly 70–85 million deaths, compared to approximately 15–22 million in World War I

I mean as regard the Nazi regime. The Third Reich basically. We went to war after Pearl Harbor got attacked by Japan; Most people at least in America think America was integral in stopping the Germans -- who as we know would not stop if you just say "Stop killing people." -- So the main questions are (In this thread--); was America being involved necessary for the Allies to win-- And, if America had joined the war sooner, would that have caused for less overall deaths? --Which between WWI or WWII had more deaths: >World War II was far deadlier, resulting in roughly 70–85 million deaths, compared to approximately 15–22 million in World War I

Absolutely not! Germany and Russia were pounding each other to dust in East Europe. At the battle of Stalingrad for example, casualties were at over 1 million. Why interfere? A Nazi government fighting a Communist Government. Perfect.

Absolutely not! Germany and Russia were pounding each other to dust in East Europe. At the battle of Stalingrad for example, casualties were at over 1 million. Why interfere? A Nazi government fighting a Communist Government. Perfect.

America joined the war because Japan attacked America
It was out of self defence
I am not American but I learned about the pearl harbour attack

America joined the war because Japan attacked America It was out of self defence I am not American but I learned about the pearl harbour attack

"Was World War 2 necessary?"

  • It was the result of a very bad Treaty of Versailles that ended the First World War.
    Hitler won the elections with his slogan 'I will make Germany great again'.

"Americans joining the war?"

  • The United States stayed neutral, until they got attacked at Pearl Harbor.
    The Allied Powers then agreed to defeat Germany first and only then Japan.

"was America being involved necessary for the Allies to win"

  • Yes. Even with the involvement of the United States the Second World War could have ended either way.
    The Battle of Stalingrad and the Naval Battle of Midway were pivotal events.

"if America had joined the war sooner, would that have caused for less overall deaths?"

  • No. It would have been the same. The United States were not armed as much yet.
"Was World War 2 necessary?" * It was the result of a very bad Treaty of Versailles that ended the First World War. Hitler won the elections with his slogan 'I will make Germany great again'. "Americans joining the war?" * The United States stayed neutral, until they got attacked at Pearl Harbor. The Allied Powers then agreed to defeat Germany first and only then Japan. "was America being involved necessary for the Allies to win" * Yes. Even with the involvement of the United States the Second World War could have ended either way. The Battle of Stalingrad and the Naval Battle of Midway were pivotal events. "if America had joined the war sooner, would that have caused for less overall deaths?" * No. It would have been the same. The United States were not armed as much yet.

Fascism is the logical consequence of capitalism.

When the bourgeoisie not only strive to exploit workers to the fullest, but also take control of political matters, emerging from the innevitable crisises under a capitalist system as in the case of Germany & Italy.

@paleshadowofmoon , if you ask a question, please provide your own answer including explaination thereof in the first comment. Otherwise this thread is entirely useless

Fascism is the logical consequence of capitalism. When the bourgeoisie not only strive to exploit workers to the fullest, but also take control of political matters, emerging from the innevitable crisises under a capitalist system as in the case of Germany & Italy. @paleshadowofmoon , if you ask a question, please provide your own answer including explaination thereof in the first comment. Otherwise this thread is entirely useless

World War 2 was not necessary, we should not blame Germany completely,obviously, the genocide is bad, sorry, my friends from Israel, but the war was actually caused by Britain, let me tell you how
Firstly, Britain could have invaded north Germany Hamburg in 1939, and then steam roll Germany to Berlin.
2nd mistake, 1940, the British empire had a full capabilities, to destroy the German Navy, especially the submarines, if they had given more funding to Turing in the 30ths , then they could have invaded , north Germany,
The biggest mistake, genocide, some people thought Britain was good, but the Bengal famine caused in India was completely preventable. And was done artificially by the British.
The bankruptcy of Britain was deserved, a peace treaty in 1940 was possible, it was that bulldog Winston Churchill, who refuse to surrender due to his ego, or if British people want to die so much, then they should have let us go free, why should India and other countries suffer for your war. That is why Subhas Chandra Bose was right, that is why that so called facist puppet, is held as a hero.

World War 2 was not necessary, we should not blame Germany completely,obviously, the genocide is bad, sorry, my friends from Israel, but the war was actually caused by Britain, let me tell you how Firstly, Britain could have invaded north Germany Hamburg in 1939, and then steam roll Germany to Berlin. 2nd mistake, 1940, the British empire had a full capabilities, to destroy the German Navy, especially the submarines, if they had given more funding to Turing in the 30ths , then they could have invaded , north Germany, The biggest mistake, genocide, some people thought Britain was good, but the Bengal famine caused in India was completely preventable. And was done artificially by the British. The bankruptcy of Britain was deserved, a peace treaty in 1940 was possible, it was that bulldog Winston Churchill, who refuse to surrender due to his ego, or if British people want to die so much, then they should have let us go free, why should India and other countries suffer for your war. That is why Subhas Chandra Bose was right, that is why that so called facist puppet, is held as a hero.

@anonymous_III said ^

Fascism is the logical consequence of capitalism.

When the bourgeoisie not only strive to exploit workers to the fullest, but also take control of political matters, emerging from the innevitable crisises under a capitalist system as in the case of Germany & Italy.

@paleshadowofmoon , if you ask a question, please provide your own answer including explaination thereof in the first comment. Otherwise this thread is entirely useless

Yes, if the Europeans wanted to die so much, then they should I let the colonies go free, why should we suffer from their war, nobody remembers the Bengal famine, everybody remembers D day.

@anonymous_III said [^](/forum/redirect/post/vlZLy2kW) > Fascism is the logical consequence of capitalism. > > When the bourgeoisie not only strive to exploit workers to the fullest, but also take control of political matters, emerging from the innevitable crisises under a capitalist system as in the case of Germany & Italy. > > @paleshadowofmoon , if you ask a question, please provide your own answer including explaination thereof in the first comment. Otherwise this thread is entirely useless Yes, if the Europeans wanted to die so much, then they should I let the colonies go free, why should we suffer from their war, nobody remembers the Bengal famine, everybody remembers D day.

@End_Game_Flame said ^

Absolutely not! Germany and Russia were pounding each other to dust in East Europe. At the battle of Stalingrad for example, casualties were at over 1 million. Why interfere? A Nazi government fighting a Communist Government. Perfect.

Although I am very critical of the British, you are even more idiotic than them, you are literally saying that the US wantedthe holocaust to go on, the USA would be decimated, as the land of the free which would have been destroyed earlier, as the geopolitical Police us role did not do anything.

@End_Game_Flame said [^](/forum/redirect/post/nYGLg9Ik) > Absolutely not! Germany and Russia were pounding each other to dust in East Europe. At the battle of Stalingrad for example, casualties were at over 1 million. Why interfere? A Nazi government fighting a Communist Government. Perfect. Although I am very critical of the British, you are even more idiotic than them, you are literally saying that the US wantedthe holocaust to go on, the USA would be decimated, as the land of the free which would have been destroyed earlier, as the geopolitical Police us role did not do anything.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.