lichess.org
Donate

That's just weird

Yea, Iḿ about 1800, and I beat him quite easily.. I think 1800~ sounds more accurate. Still, it doesn't matter. Let him put a GM title and carry a 2600 rating if that is what he needs. Who cares.

Yea, Iḿ about 1800, and I beat him quite easily.. I think 1800~ sounds more accurate. Still, it doesn't matter. Let him put a GM title and carry a 2600 rating if that is what he needs. Who cares.

@wizardmoves is pissed off so much cause he only plays buller games... and no one else is playing him ..haha

@wizardmoves is pissed off so much cause he only plays buller games... and no one else is playing him ..haha

Hi, I've only read the 1st post so yeah
My bantam...
I have never ever heard such rubbish
(When I say that I don't mean what you said was rubbish, I'm saying that's terrible behaviour of the other people, lol)
That's like saying if you won against me, you are my worst enemy all because you beat me. Its not a sin to beat someone at chess

This thing about being white
Sometimes it's better to be the one to react than to start. I actually prefer playing black most of the time but I don't mind. White means nothing. It's just a colour. An annoying colour that is the most iresistant to stains.

Cheating ruins chess 100%
You are supposed to be enjoying this
Chess is completely pointless if you do not enjoy it. You won't want to think about the position. You won't want to play it.
Please cop on

Hi, I've only read the 1st post so yeah My bantam... I have never ever heard such rubbish (When I say that I don't mean what you said was rubbish, I'm saying that's terrible behaviour of the other people, lol) That's like saying if you won against me, you are my worst enemy all because you beat me. Its not a sin to beat someone at chess This thing about being white Sometimes it's better to be the one to react than to start. I actually prefer playing black most of the time but I don't mind. White means nothing. It's just a colour. An annoying colour that is the most iresistant to stains. Cheating ruins chess 100% You are supposed to be enjoying this Chess is completely pointless if you do not enjoy it. You won't want to think about the position. You won't want to play it. Please cop on

@MKLDC75ORE4777 I'm not pissed off at all. i actually said that if you want to beat some lower rated players to appear better at chess, nobody should stop you from doing that. You dont have to play people who are better than you.

From what I understand you started to defend your behavior by saying it was due to people with low connection or something like that. Then, you get called on your lie so you make it about us cheating. Then, again, your lie is quite clearly exposed and now you just attack us individually because we speak out to your behavior? If you're going to lie, at least be better at it.

You are the one who blocks players after they beat you. You lied about it to mask your shame. Just own up to your behavior, and stop trying to make it about something else.

If you want to pretend to have a higher rating than your level, go and try to do just that - it won't change your actual chess level as is shown by me whiping the board with you (along with a lot of other 1700~). Trying to lie your way out of this sad little scheme by calling everybody else a cheater, that's just pathetic.

@MKLDC75ORE4777 I'm not pissed off at all. i actually said that if you want to beat some lower rated players to appear better at chess, nobody should stop you from doing that. You dont have to play people who are better than you. From what I understand you started to defend your behavior by saying it was due to people with low connection or something like that. Then, you get called on your lie so you make it about us cheating. Then, again, your lie is quite clearly exposed and now you just attack us individually because we speak out to your behavior? If you're going to lie, at least be better at it. You are the one who blocks players after they beat you. You lied about it to mask your shame. Just own up to your behavior, and stop trying to make it about something else. If you want to pretend to have a higher rating than your level, go and try to do just that - it won't change your actual chess level as is shown by me whiping the board with you (along with a lot of other 1700~). Trying to lie your way out of this sad little scheme by calling everybody else a cheater, that's just pathetic.

@wizardmoves @idiotbeater just let the kid be. It's clear that he does what he does, more so that he lied about it. What point are you trying to prove? Let him block everybody over 1400 if that's his chess vision, it shouldn't bother you this much.

@wizardmoves @idiotbeater just let the kid be. It's clear that he does what he does, more so that he lied about it. What point are you trying to prove? Let him block everybody over 1400 if that's his chess vision, it shouldn't bother you this much.

What is the further purpose of telling him to change his bad behavior? He is going to block better players to prevent future losses against them. It's not exactly the brightest idea, but if he wants to be like that I see no point in telling him to behave otherwise...
Like Jseijp said: let the kid be.. he'll grow up some day

What is the further purpose of telling him to change his bad behavior? He is going to block better players to prevent future losses against them. It's not exactly the brightest idea, but if he wants to be like that I see no point in telling him to behave otherwise... Like Jseijp said: let the kid be.. he'll grow up some day

@wizardmoves this is how lonely you are. I blocked you and you can't stand it so you have to find justification on why I blocked you! Pathetic

@wizardmoves this is how lonely you are. I blocked you and you can't stand it so you have to find justification on why I blocked you! Pathetic

@MKLDC75ORE4777 that’s a cute attempt, but you are still the one who blocks everybody that beats you. We all understand you are trying to mask your shame with these silly comments, you don’t need to try this, i forgive you.

@MKLDC75ORE4777 that’s a cute attempt, but you are still the one who blocks everybody that beats you. We all understand you are trying to mask your shame with these silly comments, you don’t need to try this, i forgive you.

@wizardmoves
Dude give it a rest. Let me put your mind to ease: yes, he blocks people that beat him, yes obviously he lied about it. What did you expect?
If he indeed only plays people within that 100 ratingpoints scope, he has about 20k players to block before he runs out. Some people cuss at others when they lose, some accuse you of engine cheating, apparently some block the better player entirely. Out of those options, he is still picking the best one.

@wizardmoves Dude give it a rest. Let me put your mind to ease: yes, he blocks people that beat him, yes obviously he lied about it. What did you expect? If he indeed only plays people within that 100 ratingpoints scope, he has about 20k players to block before he runs out. Some people cuss at others when they lose, some accuse you of engine cheating, apparently some block the better player entirely. Out of those options, he is still picking the best one.

Gotta give some props to @fanoffans for somehow figuring this out. Maybe the dude doesn’t want better players to ‘hunt’ him and drag his rating down? I played the guy once (Obviously, considering the topic lol :p) and would say he is probably about 1700-1750 in bullet. So if someone played him once, and noticed his level was relatively low in comparison to his rating, they might just pick him out of the lobby in order catch some easy points

Gotta give some props to @fanoffans for somehow figuring this out. Maybe the dude doesn’t want better players to ‘hunt’ him and drag his rating down? I played the guy once (Obviously, considering the topic lol :p) and would say he is probably about 1700-1750 in bullet. So if someone played him once, and noticed his level was relatively low in comparison to his rating, they might just pick him out of the lobby in order catch some easy points

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.