Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

i officially declared, WW3 gonna start next week..

Come on, World War III won’t happen soon, it will happen after, gen alpha dies out.

Come on, World War III won’t happen soon, it will happen after, gen alpha dies out.

I hope not.
China should step in and tell the United States to retreat their two aircraft carriers to the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean.
After all most of the oil through the Strait of Hormuz goes to China.

I hope not. China should step in and tell the United States to retreat their two aircraft carriers to the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. After all most of the oil through the Strait of Hormuz goes to China.

@tpr said ^

I hope not.
China should step in and tell the United States to retreat their two aircraft carriers to the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean.
After all most of the oil through the Strait of Hormuz goes to China.

At this point, I doubt the US will listen. Iran has said Chinese ships are not going to be attacked on their way out the Strait (sadly the same cannot be said for exchanges of fire that might accidentally strike craft) and it seems China does not have a lot of incentive to do so currently, given the upcoming trade talks with the US.

@tpr said [^](/forum/redirect/post/qQwe049m) > I hope not. > China should step in and tell the United States to retreat their two aircraft carriers to the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. > After all most of the oil through the Strait of Hormuz goes to China. At this point, I doubt the US will listen. Iran has said Chinese ships are not going to be attacked on their way out the Strait (sadly the same cannot be said for exchanges of fire that might accidentally strike craft) and it seems China does not have a lot of incentive to do so currently, given the upcoming trade talks with the US.

Guys stop this

This isnt funny

Because this COULD happen, and we can't just have it moved to a different day

So all i ask is for you all to stop

Guys stop this This isnt funny Because this COULD happen, and we can't just have it moved to a different day So all i ask is for you all to stop

& who are you dear Excellency

& who are you dear Excellency

I have plans to deliver my baby, can you reschedule this event?
I don't want a baby war, in fact i think we don't want baby war cuz we ll regret it

I have plans to deliver my baby, can you reschedule this event? I don't want a baby war, in fact i think we don't want baby war cuz we ll regret it

China "telling" the U.S. to leave might lead to a quick lesson about the importance of Kharg Island to the Chinese.

The U.S. (at the moment) is carefully sparing the non-military facilities of the island, because it doesn't wish to hurt the ordinary Iranian or those who depend on Iran's exports for the life of their economy.

Trying to push President Trump around would seem to be a silly idea at this point, would it not? He's not an ineffectual blusterer, after all, as should be rather evident.

There's a better solution to all of this. Iran really doesn't need nukes or intercontinental missiles. Nobody wants to invade it, it's geography would make that very difficult in any event, and it has a large, reasonably competent army.

So missiles and nukes are simply aggressive tools, not defensive tools. So why not simply decide to let neighbors live in peace, drop such pursuits, and let the world return to a better place?

The U.S. is not being run by the "autopen." And it, like Britain, has a peaceful temperament when not provoked by unpleasant necessity.

I don't think anybody is really denying the recent existence of unnecessarily enriched Uranium, not needed -- really -- for any peaceful purpose. Without a constant urge to over-enrich and develop very-long-range missiles, none of this would have happened, would it?

Funny how some people cry out to "protect Mother Earth" and protest nuclear proliferation -- but then try to defend, or at least pretend away, some examples of it, when the U.S. or Israel or perhaps even "the West" opposes it. Sometimes, politics can blunt the perception of even bright people.

China "telling" the U.S. to leave might lead to a quick lesson about the importance of Kharg Island to the Chinese. The U.S. (at the moment) is carefully sparing the non-military facilities of the island, because it doesn't wish to hurt the ordinary Iranian or those who depend on Iran's exports for the life of their economy. Trying to push President Trump around would seem to be a silly idea at this point, would it not? He's not an ineffectual blusterer, after all, as should be rather evident. There's a better solution to all of this. Iran really doesn't need nukes or intercontinental missiles. Nobody wants to invade it, it's geography would make that very difficult in any event, and it has a large, reasonably competent army. So missiles and nukes are simply aggressive tools, not defensive tools. So why not simply decide to let neighbors live in peace, drop such pursuits, and let the world return to a better place? The U.S. is not being run by the "autopen." And it, like Britain, has a peaceful temperament when not provoked by unpleasant necessity. I don't think anybody is really denying the recent existence of unnecessarily enriched Uranium, not needed -- really -- for any peaceful purpose. Without a constant urge to over-enrich and develop very-long-range missiles, none of this would have happened, would it? Funny how some people cry out to "protect Mother Earth" and protest nuclear proliferation -- but then try to defend, or at least pretend away, some examples of it, when the U.S. or Israel or perhaps even "the West" opposes it. Sometimes, politics can blunt the perception of even bright people.

@hcp_pro said ^

+1 if you agree
-1 if you disagree

yeah the iran stuff you know youre right

@hcp_pro said [^](/forum/redirect/post/FrKvTDn2) > +1 if you agree > -1 if you disagree yeah the iran stuff you know youre right

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.