@TW0_TIME_ACC said ^
meow
Can you not put random stuff like “meow” in forums where people intend to have an actual discussion? @Cedur216 was right, the level of immaturity/randomness that dosent need to be posted on forums these days is insane. Think before you post.
@TW0_TIME_ACC said [^](/forum/redirect/post/pCZy77rW)
> meow
Can you not put random stuff like “meow” in forums where people intend to have an actual discussion? @Cedur216 was right, the level of immaturity/randomness that dosent need to be posted on forums these days is insane. Think before you post.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time/
Interesting article if you want to go down the philsophical rabbit hole on the topic
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time/
Interesting article if you want to go down the philsophical rabbit hole on the topic
Time and space are manifestations of the same.
Time seems to go forward because of the big bang.
Time and space are manifestations of the same.
Time seems to go forward because of the big bang.
If you are questioning if time exists, you probably shouldn't try to host anything.
If you are questioning if time exists, you probably shouldn't try to host anything.
Depends on how we define time. According to, for example, Wikipedia (superficial search ik ik), time is defined as the continuous irreversible progression of existence. It is curious that it also says "apparently irreversible", as if there was a way we didn't know yet to reverse time. according to that, it resolves in if we exist or not. If we say we exist, time exists. If we don't exist, try defining what are we first...
Other pages declare that time is a measurable period during which an action, process or condition exists. This reflects on how we measure: seconds, days, years, etc. What if we didn't measure time in the first place? Does that mean time doesn't exist?
For example, think about math. Numbers. What if instead of 10 digits, we had invented 11? I mean, we did invent numbers, or at least how to count. I have thought a lot about these types of paradoxes where we just think things work because we made them. What if we aren't right, if we weren't right since the every beginning?
It's complicated. We can assume everything exists because we made them exist. Because we need an explanation to our surroundings. Maybe we just need another point of view, and everything will change. Who really knows?
Time might not exist, but I used ten minutes of my thrilling life into typing these words...
Depends on how we define time. According to, for example, Wikipedia (superficial search ik ik), time is defined as the continuous irreversible progression of existence. It is curious that it also says "apparently irreversible", as if there was a way we didn't know yet to reverse time. according to that, it resolves in if we exist or not. If we say we exist, time exists. If we don't exist, try defining what are we first...
Other pages declare that time is a measurable period during which an action, process or condition exists. This reflects on how we measure: seconds, days, years, etc. What if we didn't measure time in the first place? Does that mean time doesn't exist?
For example, think about math. Numbers. What if instead of 10 digits, we had invented 11? I mean, we did invent numbers, or at least how to count. I have thought a lot about these types of paradoxes where we just think things work because we made them. What if we aren't right, if we weren't right since the every beginning?
It's complicated. We can assume everything exists because we made them exist. Because we need an explanation to our surroundings. Maybe we just need another point of view, and everything will change. Who really knows?
Time might not exist, but I used ten minutes of my thrilling life into typing these words...
My theory:
There is no past and no future happening. The only thing that happens is the present, what means time doesnt really exist.
Disscus.
My theory:
There is no past and no future happening. The only thing that happens is the present, what means time doesnt really exist.
Disscus.
"Time is an illusion. Lunch-time, doubly so.."
"Time is an illusion. Lunch-time, doubly so.."
No, it doesnt. Its a property of something that does exist. Probably matter itself..
Just like velocity, color, opacity, direction, etc. Those things dont "exist", at least not on their own. You cant give me a KG or a litter of anything of that.
Those are properties of something that actually exists, matter itself.
No, it doesnt. Its a property of something that does exist. Probably matter itself..
Just like velocity, color, opacity, direction, etc. Those things dont "exist", at least not on their own. You cant give me a KG or a litter of anything of that.
Those are properties of something that actually exists, matter itself.
@Alientcp said ^
Those are properties of something that actually exists, matter itself.
That does make sense, but what do we define as existing? Exist as in physically or as in having being in reality?
@Alientcp said [^](/forum/redirect/post/XJZEdeu0)
> Those are properties of something that actually exists, matter itself.
That does make sense, but what do we define as existing? Exist as in physically or as in having being in reality?
Interesting enough time gives a meaning to complex numbers.
Additional to x, y, z, we have ict, were i is sqrt(-1) and c = the speed of light.
Interesting enough time gives a meaning to complex numbers.
Additional to x, y, z, we have ict, were i is sqrt(-1) and c = the speed of light.