Search "user:Tuck_Fheory"

@worldconqueror2013 What's the hurry?? You have your whole life to improve at chess! 1) Follow the excellent advice of @nadjarostowa 2) Follow @Lance5500 & join one of his simuls! Playing against mark…

@ClayAndSilence said in #66: > Still Kasparov, in case anyone was wondering If a peak Garry Chess was playing now, he'd be cracking skulls.

@Devil_fish Magnus is the most precise player in history but Morphy played less chess than all of the Greats, against weaker opponents. Morphy's rating is evaluated by modern engines loaded with a hun…

@Devil_fish Each generation gets stronger because of the knowledge laid down by all those who came before, and benefit from a wider pool of stronger opponents, so it's unfair to dismiss the old guard.…

@Devil_fish Morphy might well be the most naturally talented player in history. Magnus has the benefit of an extra 150 years chess theory to study, so the questions is; Would Magnus thrash Morphy if h…

@Ahmed_Mansour The #1 blitz player on this site still has nearly 400 losses from 2200 games, so it's not all gravy for the best! You need to play more games in general, but definitely play more games …

@Ahmed_Mansour You'll improve more by losing, than you will by not playing! Don't take losses personally (unless you make the mistake) & don't get down if an opponent outplays you, as even top level p…

@MrPushwood said in #4: > Yes, why the hell can't anybody spell "losing"?! I'm sure it's a typoo as they had no problem spelling asymmetry

@cumulus200 If it can't be monetized, it will be weaponized! Legislation has always been left behind human endeavours, so we are doomed to fail once the technology becomes too hot to handle; How long …

Cool blog, thanks for posting @Avetik_ChessMood Getting to the elite level of chess requires a stable mental aptitude. At all levels, games are lost because you thought they was won!