Search "user:plopsky"

@aVague said [^] > > Not sure if you meant this as a question, but I guess: > > > > If 47. Rc6 is played white quickly gets a strong passed a pawn. > > > > However after 47. Rb1 Nf4 48. Kg3 Rxd5 white…

The reason by how you can lose with limited inaccuracies is not so much because of the level of play, but based on how these inaccuracies are defined. From just a few moves into the game you are in a …

Not sure if you meant this as a question, but I guess: If 47. Rc6 is played white quickly gets a strong passed a pawn. However after 47. Rb1 Nf4 48. Kg3 Rxd5 white is still better but black has a conn…

It was already mentioned in one of the earlier comments, but I think you two are both referring to different moves, let me share the full line to avoid confusion: 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. Bxf…

What is 175? Looking at their game I would guess their rating?!

@aVague said [^] > too easy queen win for 2200 I think, But Fun When he missed Kb2 in the end its indeed a bit of a shame, but given that they had just 5 seconds left we can understand how it happend …

In this game, which was serious in the sense that both players tried to win and we did not push pawns after the win was clear, there were a total of 8(!!) queens involved. Two from the starting positi…

It is fixed now, thanks!

It's even worse, if the analysis starts with a 1 (eg 13), then it even hides the one. This is especially relevant for variants where the scores can be more extreme.

Since very recently the engine toggle blocks the plus or minus sign of the evaluation. So you can see that the evaluation is 7.1 but it's actually -7.1. This can be quite harmful if someone is unaware…