lichess.org
Donate

Introducing : Impulsive chess, part 2

Let's hear what you're thinking.

Let's hear what you're thinking.

That game utterly and purely confused me

That game utterly and purely confused me

I understand that it is fun to play aggressively, but on the other hand it seems for you it is also painful to lose game fastly after giving up just the knight. Would chess be more enjoyable after doing some tactical puzzles to learn patterns when and how attack and also calculation more deeply during game?

On the other hand if you just play and not analyse at all then maybe you don't feel piece losses as painful? Sometimes the attack works and sometimes it doesn't. I am just thinking aloud :)

I understand that it is fun to play aggressively, but on the other hand it seems for you it is also painful to lose game fastly after giving up just the knight. Would chess be more enjoyable after doing some tactical puzzles to learn patterns when and how attack and also calculation more deeply during game? On the other hand if you just play and not analyse at all then maybe you don't feel piece losses as painful? Sometimes the attack works and sometimes it doesn't. I am just thinking aloud :)

@BillieJoe said in #4:

I understand that it is fun to play aggressively, but on the other hand it seems for you it is also painful to lose game fastly after giving up just the knight. Would chess be more enjoyable after doing some tactical puzzles to learn patterns when and how attack and also calculation more deeply during game?

On the other hand if you just play and not analyse at all then maybe you don't feel piece losses as painful? Sometimes the attack works and sometimes it doesn't. I am just thinking aloud :)

I agree with you. In that game I was lucky that everything worked out well, also thanks to my opponent's mistakes. And my blog posts are just to try to entertain and inspire some other chess players.

And I do analyze some of my games. Yesterday I posted about a tactic blunder where I overlooked a defense :)
https://lichess.org/forum/team-team-achja/bad-tactic-but-still-some-fun

@BillieJoe said in #4: > I understand that it is fun to play aggressively, but on the other hand it seems for you it is also painful to lose game fastly after giving up just the knight. Would chess be more enjoyable after doing some tactical puzzles to learn patterns when and how attack and also calculation more deeply during game? > > On the other hand if you just play and not analyse at all then maybe you don't feel piece losses as painful? Sometimes the attack works and sometimes it doesn't. I am just thinking aloud :) I agree with you. In that game I was lucky that everything worked out well, also thanks to my opponent's mistakes. And my blog posts are just to try to entertain and inspire some other chess players. And I do analyze some of my games. Yesterday I posted about a tactic blunder where I overlooked a defense :) https://lichess.org/forum/team-team-achja/bad-tactic-but-still-some-fun

nice... knight on d5 a gorgeous outpost, what engine says black has to do after 16. exf5 is absolutely disgusting, sac back a rook to bring king away from center and black could hold it, probably guy should just castle normally next time haha...

nice... knight on d5 a gorgeous outpost, what engine says black has to do after 16. exf5 is absolutely disgusting, sac back a rook to bring king away from center and black could hold it, probably guy should just castle normally next time haha...