The Best White Opening at YOUR ELO: A 71-Million Game Analysis

@MeWantCookieMobile said ^

not going above something as low and poor as only 2000 is pretty sad.

I don't think it's sad, but I do think it's disservice to the people that is suppose to be the target. I was always told as a 1200 player that I should be looking well above my rating. So it IS logical for a 1200 to look at 1800-2000 games. And 1600 look at 2200-2400, and of course 1800 should be looking at 2400+. I also don't see the point of condemning a rating as low and poor. I mean I see you are 2400, that is only like an average NM. Nothing to be all superiority complex about. And even if Carlsen said that, I would probably just think he was an a$$wipe. Someone shouldn't feel bad because they can't attain your spectacular rating Mr Ego.

sorry that you're stuck at that rating too :(

I'm not. I just play. I don't care about your ego.

aww poor thing ️

@MeWantCookieMobile said ^

It's fine. The question isn't if it is fine. The question is how you think in chess. If you are having trouble with a tested true opening.. it's your own thought process or lack of understanding that the problem lies. So you want to find out what your are missing.

@Neevu said ^

is. the guicco piaona good for an 1800 player, my peak was 1840 , but then i had. tilt. so. i'm slowly regaining my elo, any tips to. improve. and. go. to. 2000 and above

thanks :)

You're welcome.

Have you ever sat down with someone, or sent a game in for review to see where you might be lacking? A lot of people on here "only play". And half of those people who only play wonder why there is no improvement, the other half don't care. But the biggest improvements is criticizing your own play. And being honest about it, trying your best to be humble and giving preference to losses.

@Neevu said ^

It's fine. The question isn't if it is fine. The question is how you think in chess. If you are having trouble with a tested true opening.. it's your own thought process or lack of understanding that the problem lies. So you want to find out what your are missing.

@Neevu said ^

is. the guicco piaona good for an 1800 player, my peak was 1840 , but then i had. tilt. so. i'm slowly regaining my elo, any tips to. improve. and. go. to. 2000 and above

thanks :)

i. hav.e a rule less then 6. games a day, i mainly play 3 games ,a nd i. anyslyse them , that has shown. a. decent. improvement my uscf went from. 800 to 1400 in. half a year

@RemiliaEnjoyer said ^

not going above something as low and poor as only 2000 is pretty sad.

I don't think it's sad, but I do think it's disservice to the people that is suppose to be the target. I was always told as a 1200 player that I should be looking well above my rating. So it IS logical for a 1200 to look at 1800-2000 games. And 1600 look at 2200-2400, and of course 1800 should be looking at 2400+. I also don't see the point of condemning a rating as low and poor. I mean I see you are 2400, that is only like an average NM. Nothing to be all superiority complex about. And even if Carlsen said that, I would probably just think he was an a$$wipe. Someone shouldn't feel bad because they can't attain your spectacular rating Mr Ego.

sorry that you're stuck at that rating too :(

I'm not. I just play. I don't care about your ego.

aww poor thing ️

bro stop being. a karen

@Neevu said ^

i. hav.e a rule less then 6. games a day, i mainly play 3 games ,a nd i. anyslyse them , that has shown. a. decent. improvement my uscf went from. 800 to 1400 in. half a year

There are forums for game analysis on here. I don't mind being tagged and asked to give an opinion every one in a while. And I am sure if you post you could get more opinionated people to comment. Sometimes you get pretty decent advice from people and you might find out what your issue is with the opening you want to learn.

@Neevu said ^

not going above something as low and poor as only 2000 is pretty sad.

I don't think it's sad, but I do think it's disservice to the people that is suppose to be the target. I was always told as a 1200 player that I should be looking well above my rating. So it IS logical for a 1200 to look at 1800-2000 games. And 1600 look at 2200-2400, and of course 1800 should be looking at 2400+. I also don't see the point of condemning a rating as low and poor. I mean I see you are 2400, that is only like an average NM. Nothing to be all superiority complex about. And even if Carlsen said that, I would probably just think he was an a$$wipe. Someone shouldn't feel bad because they can't attain your spectacular rating Mr Ego.

sorry that you're stuck at that rating too :(

I'm not. I just play. I don't care about your ego.

aww poor thing ️

bro stop being. a karen

love u too adorable little 800 uscf

i'm 1400 uscf

@Neevu said ^

i'm 1400 uscf

same thing

what is your. uscf. anyway