1.Kg3 is easier to counter lol))) But even Cyber play this! So I'll try to play 1.Kh3)
Why did u block me?
1.Kg3 is easier to counter lol))) But even Cyber play this! So I'll try to play 1.Kh3)
Why did u block me?
@mete0ra_return said in #21:
1.Kg3 is easier to counter lol))) But even Cyber play this! So I'll try to play 1.Kh3)
Did you just compare yourself with Cyber?
@mete0ra_return said in #21:
> 1.Kg3 is easier to counter lol))) But even Cyber play this! So I'll try to play 1.Kh3)
Did you just compare yourself with Cyber?
@TAiSThuban said in #22:
Did you just compare yourself with Cyber?
Why not? We divided 1st place for 5 days)
@TAiSThuban said in #22:
> Did you just compare yourself with Cyber?
Why not? We divided 1st place for 5 days)
<Comment deleted by user>
@mete0ra_return said in #4:
Nice blog, @ALucasM !!! It was really hard to find 1st rk game on lichess! Well, who don't know, I'm really @esn08. Well, I got banned after game, that Lucas linked. But why? Well, lichess keep it in mystery... I didn't have a notification, message from @lichess - I realised it when I wanted to check friends from my other account. It was quietly shocking, because I didn't know the reason! And don't know even now... I have some variants now, but they all are quietly not logical. Firstly, as was my first think, I got banned because of having 2 accounts. But why I got banned only after around a year after making 2nd acc? Also, GM Andreikin (who is well-known in Russia) has 2 accounts, or, as you know, @sathsaradissanayakee has around 6 accs... Second variant is farming rating on weaker opponents - well, what is wrong? I divided 1st place with @CyberShredder and we together wanted to be 1st. We didn't want to play each other so we needed to play with weaker opponents. Of course, when you play with 2000 and you win him 10-0 you don't want to stop... Third variant seems to be more real: smth around month ago lichess wrote dm that my opponent resign or leave time many times in draw or win positions. But, really? I think you know, when you play the tournament and your opponent resign on 0 move or don't move pieces - for example @r2300 in shield arena didn't move at least in 3 games! What about other games? Well, flagging is the science, but it is normal - for example ultrabullet, where in 95% games between weak opponents it is the winning "strategy". Also, opponent's connection can go down or someone else called him, or he've got to go - it is ok, I have lost a lot of games because of it... Or smth like my opponents are afraid of me - yes, I think it is stupid, but people are different. For example, this game - lichess.org/wY3dygOV#0 . Forth is a lot of reports on me. A lot of players reported me, because I was really strong in some games and very stupid in others. But it is normal for a chess player - it is typical mood (or in other translators "spirit" - I don't know how it is in English, but in russian it is настрой) When you're concentrated - you play well, when you lost 4 in row - you'll lose next game cause you've already lost concentration. I don't know why, I have a lot of haters and a little friends. I can say that in last day of my previous account 40 players from top100 rk reported and blocked me! Maybe you'll not believe to me, BUT IT IS REAL! Also some other good players blocked me - horde top10 @boburjon007 and even @Lance5500! Here are the links: lichess.org/43eTjtK4/black#0 and lichess.org/sbvaUEjC but does lichess ban players with a lot of reports, doesn't it? And last, fifth: affront. I am really irascible. I have bad habit to answer all dm( Now I try not to have contacts with haters, but some episodes was really funny) I can parry affronts and "сounterattack" the hater - that makes me laugh but he can report on me (but he was the initiator and he perfectly know this). But this variant is false too because @Apollo2023 (you all know that he got banned on farming rating on playing with his other account) was twice dmed me with a lot of f-words but HE NOT BANNED BECAUSE OF IT!!! So, I can't agree with moderators' decidement... If you have other variant of banning me - you can dm me or leave the comment in this post (I think, Lucas will allow this) And I want moderators to unban my first account because it is quietly sad to destroy 20k games. I wanted to take part in rkwc - to show my real strength (because a lot of people this that it was 100% luck that I got top1 for a short time) also @denorus in dm ssaid that my real strength is 2200 (and it was not affront???) - that's why I hate donuts because their lord is arrogant. I just can recommend all players to play ONLY RATED GAMES because only them show your real skill. If you wanna boast about your rating - you just will be down in first normal game. One day, I played a rated game with my girlfriend on lichess and we together needed to stop the game quickly. She had 400 rating upon me, but she resigned because 1) if you play at your level - your rating will return back 2) don't care of lichess rating! It is quietly not affect on smth. Now I will not play rk much - I reached top1 but unfortunately I can't win rkwc :-( I better will play real chess - it is more useful. Thanks to all who was with me in my rk career - r2300, who put rk in me (with this game) lichess.org/oU3GUj9R RoyalManiac, who answered on my questions about the theory, CyberShredder, who can't give me 1st rank, Yura-11, who taught me basic things in rk, CarlessLilian, who tought me famous 1.Kh3 opening, or other players, with whom I had intresting games - huangyudong, Ananddeepu, ALucasM, Gautham_A, AnIndianChessplayer, QueenEatingDragon. That's all - my soul is pure)
am i supposed to read all that
@mete0ra_return said in #4:
> Nice blog, @ALucasM !!! It was really hard to find 1st rk game on lichess! Well, who don't know, I'm really @esn08. Well, I got banned after game, that Lucas linked. But why? Well, lichess keep it in mystery... I didn't have a notification, message from @lichess - I realised it when I wanted to check friends from my other account. It was quietly shocking, because I didn't know the reason! And don't know even now... I have some variants now, but they all are quietly not logical. Firstly, as was my first think, I got banned because of having 2 accounts. But why I got banned only after around a year after making 2nd acc? Also, GM Andreikin (who is well-known in Russia) has 2 accounts, or, as you know, @sathsaradissanayakee has around 6 accs... Second variant is farming rating on weaker opponents - well, what is wrong? I divided 1st place with @CyberShredder and we together wanted to be 1st. We didn't want to play each other so we needed to play with weaker opponents. Of course, when you play with 2000 and you win him 10-0 you don't want to stop... Third variant seems to be more real: smth around month ago lichess wrote dm that my opponent resign or leave time many times in draw or win positions. But, really? I think you know, when you play the tournament and your opponent resign on 0 move or don't move pieces - for example @r2300 in shield arena didn't move at least in 3 games! What about other games? Well, flagging is the science, but it is normal - for example ultrabullet, where in 95% games between weak opponents it is the winning "strategy". Also, opponent's connection can go down or someone else called him, or he've got to go - it is ok, I have lost a lot of games because of it... Or smth like my opponents are afraid of me - yes, I think it is stupid, but people are different. For example, this game - lichess.org/wY3dygOV#0 . Forth is a lot of reports on me. A lot of players reported me, because I was really strong in some games and very stupid in others. But it is normal for a chess player - it is typical mood (or in other translators "spirit" - I don't know how it is in English, but in russian it is настрой) When you're concentrated - you play well, when you lost 4 in row - you'll lose next game cause you've already lost concentration. I don't know why, I have a lot of haters and a little friends. I can say that in last day of my previous account 40 players from top100 rk reported and blocked me! Maybe you'll not believe to me, BUT IT IS REAL! Also some other good players blocked me - horde top10 @boburjon007 and even @Lance5500! Here are the links: lichess.org/43eTjtK4/black#0 and lichess.org/sbvaUEjC but does lichess ban players with a lot of reports, doesn't it? And last, fifth: affront. I am really irascible. I have bad habit to answer all dm( Now I try not to have contacts with haters, but some episodes was really funny) I can parry affronts and "сounterattack" the hater - that makes me laugh but he can report on me (but he was the initiator and he perfectly know this). But this variant is false too because @Apollo2023 (you all know that he got banned on farming rating on playing with his other account) was twice dmed me with a lot of f-words but HE NOT BANNED BECAUSE OF IT!!! So, I can't agree with moderators' decidement... If you have other variant of banning me - you can dm me or leave the comment in this post (I think, Lucas will allow this) And I want moderators to unban my first account because it is quietly sad to destroy 20k games. I wanted to take part in rkwc - to show my real strength (because a lot of people this that it was 100% luck that I got top1 for a short time) also @denorus in dm ssaid that my real strength is 2200 (and it was not affront???) - that's why I hate donuts because their lord is arrogant. I just can recommend all players to play ONLY RATED GAMES because only them show your real skill. If you wanna boast about your rating - you just will be down in first normal game. One day, I played a rated game with my girlfriend on lichess and we together needed to stop the game quickly. She had 400 rating upon me, but she resigned because 1) if you play at your level - your rating will return back 2) don't care of lichess rating! It is quietly not affect on smth. Now I will not play rk much - I reached top1 but unfortunately I can't win rkwc :-( I better will play real chess - it is more useful. Thanks to all who was with me in my rk career - r2300, who put rk in me (with this game) lichess.org/oU3GUj9R RoyalManiac, who answered on my questions about the theory, CyberShredder, who can't give me 1st rank, Yura-11, who taught me basic things in rk, CarlessLilian, who tought me famous 1.Kh3 opening, or other players, with whom I had intresting games - huangyudong, Ananddeepu, ALucasM, Gautham_A, AnIndianChessplayer, QueenEatingDragon. That's all - my soul is pure)
am i supposed to read all that
@mete0ra_return said in #23:
Why not? We divided 1st place for 5 days
but never more if you don't change of opening, it's very bored always the same :/
@ALucasM said in #17:
@TAiSThuban said in #11:
Personally, I find Kh3 very hard to counter.
You have to play very bad for lose against that if it's not by time
@mete0ra_return said in #23:
> Why not? We divided 1st place for 5 days
but never more if you don't change of opening, it's very bored always the same :/
@ALucasM said in #17:
>@TAiSThuban said in #11:
>
>Personally, I find Kh3 very hard to counter.
You have to play very bad for lose against that if it's not by time
@mete0ra_return said in #23:
Why not? We divided 1st place for 5 days)
No offense, but top 1 in the RK leaderboard with 2430 rating can't prove your strength. There are many people who have reached high rating, but had lower rating when you were top 1, can you say they are weaker than you? Rating is poor way to measure strength anyway, since it's possible to farm rating from low level players and avoid players your own level. In my opinion, the fairest way to measure strength is to play best of 10 matches with blitz time control against players your own level. But you never did(correct me if I'm wrong), so you can't say you are a strong player, just a high rating player.
@mete0ra_return said in #23:
> Why not? We divided 1st place for 5 days)
No offense, but top 1 in the RK leaderboard with 2430 rating can't prove your strength. There are many people who have reached high rating, but had lower rating when you were top 1, can you say they are weaker than you? Rating is poor way to measure strength anyway, since it's possible to farm rating from low level players and avoid players your own level. In my opinion, the fairest way to measure strength is to play best of 10 matches with blitz time control against players your own level. But you never did(correct me if I'm wrong), so you can't say you are a strong player, just a high rating player.
<Comment deleted by user>
@ALucasM said in #1:
Comments on lichess.org/@/alucasm/blog/racing-kings-post-june-2024/BmY2B0bl
You should also add weekly winners
@ALucasM said in #1:
> Comments on lichess.org/@/alucasm/blog/racing-kings-post-june-2024/BmY2B0bl
You should also add weekly winners
And even create a forum in the team for submissions of interesting stuff from the month, and add some in the blog, so we get more info, even from below 1800 community
And even create a forum in the team for submissions of interesting stuff from the month, and add some in the blog, so we get more info, even from below 1800 community
