The wording in this post is very suspicious, very AI seeming I have no side to this debate but the extreme defensive measures you’re taking is a bit suspicious. If it were me I would just let people be wrong if they were wrong, not come up with a 9 paragraph defense on the matter.
The wording in this post is very suspicious, very AI seeming I have no side to this debate but the extreme defensive measures you’re taking is a bit suspicious. If it were me I would just let people be wrong if they were wrong, not come up with a 9 paragraph defense on the matter.
In the @RuyLopez1000 `s study i saw that amazing tactics wrote the same words but added emojis
In the @RuyLopez1000 `s study i saw that amazing tactics wrote the same words but added emojis
@BlackPanda2024 said in #11:
The wording in this post is very suspicious, very AI seeming I have no side to this debate but the extreme defensive measures you’re taking is a bit suspicious. If it were me I would just let people be wrong if they were wrong, not come up with a 9 paragraph defense on the matter.
I agree. https://lichess.org/@/DiligentKnight23/blog/update-amazing_tactics-also-writes-ai-generated-blogs/SqnZKeHB
I wrote this, please check it out.
@BlackPanda2024 said in #11:
> The wording in this post is very suspicious, very AI seeming I have no side to this debate but the extreme defensive measures you’re taking is a bit suspicious. If it were me I would just let people be wrong if they were wrong, not come up with a 9 paragraph defense on the matter.
I agree. https://lichess.org/@/DiligentKnight23/blog/update-amazing_tactics-also-writes-ai-generated-blogs/SqnZKeHB
I wrote this, please check it out.
@Leo-Skrypachov said in #12:
In the @RuyLopez1000 `s study i saw that amazing tactics wrote the same words but added emojis
I mean blog
@Leo-Skrypachov said in #12:
> In the @RuyLopez1000 `s study i saw that amazing tactics wrote the same words but added emojis
I mean blog