@TimKostyria said in #10:
> Thank you for the site and your efforts to make the site
Your welcome, I am having lots of fun with it.
It's for free !!!
I am loving those notation trainer and playing blindfold chess. Website UI is minimalistic and clean. Few requests :-
1) can we have option to choose engine level?
2) can you bring an app or better web version for mobile?
3) can you make classic game bit more informative? Such as by adding notes under every important move ?
4) is it possible to have classic games or just study (as in lichess) based on certain opening such as if we search italian then under which we can go to annand or gary ,queens gambit then under which magnus .
Я ХОЧУ ВТУРНИР!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@lazylitan said in #12:
> It's for free !!!
> I am loving those notation trainer and playing blindfold chess. Website UI is minimalistic and clean. Few requests :-
> 1) can we have option to choose engine level?
> 2) can you bring an app or better web version for mobile?
> 3) can you make classic game bit more informative? Such as by adding notes under every important move ?
> 4) is it possible to have classic games or just study (as in lichess) based on certain opening such as if we search italian then under which we can go to annand or gary ,queens gambit then under which magnus .
Hi @lazylitan ,
Yes, it is free and will stay that way, I am thinking of premium analytical features, but the current set of games will be free forever.
1) I will add the engine level to my backlog for a future release. I was thinking about having bots, but maybe just levels would be good for now.
2) I have tried to make this as mobile friendly as possible, I am planning on making a few more tweaks to make it more mobile friendly i.e. full screen (zen) mode etc... as I think the menu and headers can go if we click on zen mode.
3) My rating is around 2,000 on Lichess, so there is no way I can add comments to the games (there are tons of them) and do it justice, if there is any Masters that would like to help, I will add it (the functionality has been built to allow for arrows, square highlights and comments, but I am not good enough to notate these)
4) I am currently working on a Repertoire Builder that will incorporate this functionality, however, the first version will be released in the second half of next year. The main thing is that Lichess does the Study really well, so it would take a lot of work to replicate this without any real benefit.
Bots might be better choices of levels. As you can borrow from more than one engine family. You just need lots of tournament data, which SF fishtest ecosystem does provide for their 20 levels, AFAIK (or understand, or stood), but the same can be done from using perhaps Lichess bots accumulated data if they are open sourced. Is that not possible? Those bots are bathing in human population opponents (I don't know if they play against each other). How stable is the Lichess bot population?
@dboing said in #15:
> Bots might be better choices of levels. As you can borrow from more than one engine family. You just need lots of tournament data, which SF fishtest ecosystem does provide for their 20 levels, AFAIK (or understand, or stood), but the same can be done from using perhaps Lichess bots accumulated data if they are open sourced. Is that not possible? Those bots are bathing in human population opponents (I don't know if they play against each other). How stable is the Lichess bot population?
I will need to investigate this a bit, but it is on my roadmap.