@ZugAddict said in #28:
> Which music? I'm a bit confused because music is set to "off" by default.
>
> Sorry,
>
> - Zug
so the songs in the blog. sound off proposition? got me confused myself.
> Also, here's a clip of the Glorious Mole Intro Song:
And the one after. I could not listen for long, and my giggle from the beginning of the blog went away. And then the other one after...
> And the one after. I could not listen for long, and my giggle from the beginning of the blog went away. And then the other one after...
Oh. Sorry for your loss of giggle.
Sincerely,
- Zug
Honestly, this is a great variant that should be added to lichess. Lichess doesn't have any team variants yet, and I am curious to see what would happen if this was added. The idea is great, but it need to be known more.
Sincerely,
Me
@Flamin-Hot-Cheetos said in #33:
> Honestly, this is a great variant that should be added to lichess. Lichess doesn't have any team variants yet, and I am curious to see what would happen if this was added. The idea is great, but it need to be known more.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Me
Great Idea.
easy
6.022*10^23
Basically this is the chess version of among us
@LucyHuan said in #36:
> 6.022*10^23
good one. Also I wouldn't advise anyone to leave lichess.org. Certainly mole chess . com is not supported nor affiliated with lichess.org.
Ok. Going serious. This got me thinking about a more interesting idea I already have about non-vote team chess.
Only, since we only know solo-chess, and that is no pressure toward a scientific languages among "us".... (hold you breath).
"Us" or them, since I might be a patzer outlier, but yet, us being how we keep viewing chess a contest of 2 of some kind that we might get all jumping up and down looking at, even when not participating... With ooos and ahhhs.. and what not, maybe even advertisements and on-board eval gauges.
So, we don't. (now, let air out, and continue the previous paragraph unfinished sentence here). We have only the best move grunt that might act as the time pressured vote chess. The only way we can comprehand team chess.
If there were some deliberation with a common efficient language so we would not have to doubt the intent of the team members, even the most sophistic tortured sole could be without even an emotional "cheater" flinch, be weeded out by such mechanism of deliberation, as it would not be one oracle opinion against 2 others.. It would be whatever combined expertise level made explicit intra-team arguments. And if teams could evolved the quality of contribution to reasopning chess within team could itself be intra-team selected against over many games.. It may not be upon a "cheat" call, but a compatibility/complementary of the n in m pool of teamates evoluation. Teams would not have to be stuck for ever. There could be pools... and people would get to know each other, and do games of reasoning, learn the difference between competition and cooperation, and with whom.. Also, learn about communicating the possible emerging logics (yes, in unknown, I tend to not bet on the most narrow understanding of anything at first, my bad most of the time, but my hard wiring it seems, wide spiral search pattern is my temptation). Maybe I could influence others to try that.. While I can still share my thoughts. on something I find fascinating (i.e. have passion of curiosity for).
Mole chess is the sick offspring of solo-chess trying to go team chess from the spectacular observer point of view. Sure, the human greed might win in such context.. when there is not ground and no respect for the reasoning aspect of the game. The possibility that an oracle got fixed.
@dboing said in #39:
> on-board eval gauges
on-board eval gauges? You can't be seriously recommending this. No format should include this because people will want it in standard..