Very minor nitpick, since this is only a thing at very low levels of Chess (I'm only 500 elo on Chess.com), but I wanted to note that while Stockfish doesn't really like 2. ...Nc3 for Wayward Queen and prefers 2. ...d3, it is the closest thing to a book move as that opening has and should be filtered out as such.
Your the besttt.
Great work man and you are accully helping me with those superpower notes and they are as bright as my dreams.
Hope you see this
Until next time,
Peace out ️
@BinaryHedgehog said in #11:
> Very minor nitpick, since this is only a thing at very low levels of Chess (I'm only 500 elo on Chess.com), but I wanted to note that while Stockfish doesn't really like 2. ...Nc3 for Wayward Queen and prefers 2. ...d3, it is the closest thing to a book move as that opening has and should be filtered out as such.
I am not familiar with the wayward Queen, would you be able to give me the line, I am super curious. I would like to check it out to see what is going on.
Intersting tool, congrats on that work!
For me, the main feature missing is filters. For my personal use case, I would like to filter only rapid and classical games played in the past 2-3 years. The blitz/bullet games are not relevant at all to me, bc i play a lot of nonsense in those.
@dalubor said in #14:
> Intersting tool, congrats on that work!
>
> For me, the main feature missing is filters. For my personal use case, I would like to filter only rapid and classical games played in the past 2-3 years. The blitz/bullet games are not relevant at all to me, bc i play a lot of nonsense in those.
Yeah. I am thinking of adding filters and some other nice stuff for the final version. I am the same, my blitz and bullet games are silly, whereas my.rapid and classical games are more representative.
@HollowLeaf said in #13:
> > Very minor nitpick, since this is only a thing at very low levels of Chess (I'm only 500 elo on Chess.com), but I wanted to note that while Stockfish doesn't really like 2. ...Nc3 for Wayward Queen and prefers 2. ...d3, it is the closest thing to a book move as that opening has and should be filtered out as such.
>
> I am not familiar with the wayward Queen, would you be able to give me the line, I am super curious. I would like to check it out to see what is going on.
1. e4 e5
2. Qh5
From here, White threatens the e5 pawn, and there are two traditional responses
2... Nc6 is the most popular move, and often considered the best by human theory, as it protects the pawn and allows for Nf6 to threaten the Queen
2... Nf6 is called the "Kiddie Countergambit" and sacrifices the e pawn for a lead in development
White is generally looking to play 3. Bc3 to threaten Scholars mate with Qxf2#
However, Stockfish considers 2... d6 its top line (even though given enough time it will actually consider it -0.1 vs Nc6 -0.2. Though after 3. Bc4, both positions are -0.3), and the tool is saying that it's an inaccuracy as a result
https://test.chessboardmagic.com/openinginaccuracies
I typed my user name and changed the settings to : 100, 10, 24, 3.
The 100 games I hope they are the most recent, waiting estimate 6 minutes.
Ply 10 is like puzzles 5 moves deep. So I should be able to understand the reason why.
I think Depth 24 is the optimal depth setting for my pc. Sure my cpu can analyse deeper, must the time to reach depth 40 is not worth the wait. I am happy with my i5-6500T running on linux.
An analysis of the 3 PV lines is good enough for me.
It would be great if we could use the 100 games from a marathon or a theme tournament, to match the same time controls.
The other benefit is the form we were in for that tournament. Just picking any 100 games with mix time controls is just a test.
I should of used 10 games just to see the results before increasing it to 100. The wait time to get the results takes time.
Thanks for sharing. I am a programmer who dabbles with chess. Is the site running stockfish on the browser, or do you have a server backing this all?
I really like the UI and the idea. Some of the cases where I got worse than 1 cpl were interesting but unconventional lines (e.g. playing pawn moves for most of the first 10 moves to build a big center).
I tried it on my most recent 100 games as black and white. I ended up having a lot of positions only happening once. Also I had a lot of lines which were ok. For performance 2 pv and depth 15 seemed ok.
One hour, 15 minutes and 0.5 seconds later ...
Why is PV1 and PV2 the same?
One hour, 15 minutes and 0.5 seconds later ...
Why is PV1 and PV2 the same?
what is the github link?