Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

The Daily Gambit #1: The Jerome (Sorry Stockfish!)

@daproguy said in #40:

This is honestly so funny. The difference in some of these responses is hilarious. Take

"Just because it doesn’t make sense doesn’t mean it’s written by ai. I got confused too when i first researched about the jerome, cuz none of it makes sense. Ai detectors are NOT that reliable at all, and i know that there’s ai slop everywhere, why would i even use an ai to help me make this blog? All the ais do is just teleport pieces in and out of dimensions anyway. Whats the point?"

and just compare the grammer (using i not I, Ai not AI, cuz, etc) to this other reply(and most of them)

"Let’s clear the air: I’m not banned, I’m just 'marked.' For the curious, I left a few study tabs open during a match (shoutout to my sister for the heads-up). It was a blunder, sure, but unlike some of you, I actually play the games.

To the 'AI Accusers': If clean formatting and bullet points look like 'slop' to you, it’s probably because you haven't written an essay since middle school. Professionalism isn't artificial; it’s just high-effort. Try it sometime.

To the Haters: Keep the 'war crimes' comments and the forum threads coming. Your obsession has pushed this blog into the Weekly Best section with nearly 10k views which is a milestone. You’re basically my unpaid PR team at this point, and for that, I offer my sincerest gratitude.

To the First 20 Members Of The Club: I offer my sincerest gratitudes to you too, my fellow gambit tacticians, for helping the club grow. We’re gonna get busy winning, typing, and dominating."

Chess wise, this gambit is one of the stupider ideas I've seen, epically how bad the analysis is making the few ideas that are present not even shown or explained. Lichess really should step up on blog quality control, this is a bit silly. (I also know that by replying I'm just feeding the engagement bait, but whatever)

In my first comment, I was kind of pissed, so when I commented I did try commenting politely whilst thinking about the forum etiquette. You are right, this gambit is pretty stupid, that's why I said I'll be featuring "where I look at the most cursed, unsound, and borderline disrespectful gambits ever played". If you read the intro and the opening paragraph, then maybe you'll see why I made this blog. Yes, my sister did agree with you, so I'll make sure I'll keep my grammar in check for you to be happy. I really don't need more hate, I haven't done anything wrong :/

@daproguy said in #40: > This is honestly so funny. The difference in some of these responses is hilarious. Take > > "Just because it doesn’t make sense doesn’t mean it’s written by ai. I got confused too when i first researched about the jerome, cuz none of it makes sense. Ai detectors are NOT that reliable at all, and i know that there’s ai slop everywhere, why would i even use an ai to help me make this blog? All the ais do is just teleport pieces in and out of dimensions anyway. Whats the point?" > > and just compare the grammer (using i not I, Ai not AI, cuz, etc) to this other reply(and most of them) > > "Let’s clear the air: I’m not banned, I’m just 'marked.' For the curious, I left a few study tabs open during a match (shoutout to my sister for the heads-up). It was a blunder, sure, but unlike some of you, I actually play the games. > > To the 'AI Accusers': If clean formatting and bullet points look like 'slop' to you, it’s probably because you haven't written an essay since middle school. Professionalism isn't artificial; it’s just high-effort. Try it sometime. > > To the Haters: Keep the 'war crimes' comments and the forum threads coming. Your obsession has pushed this blog into the Weekly Best section with nearly 10k views which is a milestone. You’re basically my unpaid PR team at this point, and for that, I offer my sincerest gratitude. > > To the First 20 Members Of The Club: I offer my sincerest gratitudes to you too, my fellow gambit tacticians, for helping the club grow. We’re gonna get busy winning, typing, and dominating." > > Chess wise, this gambit is one of the stupider ideas I've seen, epically how bad the analysis is making the few ideas that are present not even shown or explained. Lichess really should step up on blog quality control, this is a bit silly. (I also know that by replying I'm just feeding the engagement bait, but whatever) In my first comment, I was kind of pissed, so when I commented I did try commenting politely whilst thinking about the forum etiquette. You are right, this gambit is pretty stupid, that's why I said I'll be featuring "where I look at the most cursed, unsound, and borderline disrespectful gambits ever played". If you read the intro and the opening paragraph, then maybe you'll see why I made this blog. Yes, my sister did agree with you, so I'll make sure I'll keep my grammar in check for you to be happy. I really don't need more hate, I haven't done anything wrong :/

A question that is not about the gambit.Why did you got banned? I am just courious (no offence)

A question that is not about the gambit.Why did you got banned? I am just courious (no offence)

@RAVi4102 said in #42:

A question that is not about the gambit.Why did you got banned? I am just courious (no offence)

I'm not banned, just marked. I lowkey left three study tab that was supposed to be for the Halloween Gambit during a game, and yeah. I tried appealling but they said it was final. Though my rating is restricted, I have the freedom to blog. To be honest, your curiousity is valid, and I appreciate you for asking politely :)

@RAVi4102 said in #42: > A question that is not about the gambit.Why did you got banned? I am just courious (no offence) I'm not banned, just marked. I lowkey left three study tab that was supposed to be for the Halloween Gambit during a game, and yeah. I tried appealling but they said it was final. Though my rating is restricted, I have the freedom to blog. To be honest, your curiousity is valid, and I appreciate you for asking politely :)

@Lord_of_the_River said in #39:

Honestly, even if your comments weren’t suspiciously like that of an AI, and you weren’t “marked”, the fact that you are asking players to go for the Jerome is embarrassing. It’s a disgusting opening, and let me assure you, a good player with black WILL destroy white in any time format.
On a side note, congrats on getting so many views purporting a blunder.

Disgusting? Maybe. Effective? 10k views say yes. You’re worried about 'theoretical destruction' by Black, while I’m worried about having fun and building a fast-growing club. If winning with a 'disgusting' opening is a crime, then call me a criminal. I’ll be over here celebrating my 'purported blunders' with my new members while you study your draws.

@Lord_of_the_River said in #39: > Honestly, even if your comments weren’t suspiciously like that of an AI, and you weren’t “marked”, the fact that you are asking players to go for the Jerome is embarrassing. It’s a disgusting opening, and let me assure you, a good player with black WILL destroy white in any time format. > On a side note, congrats on getting so many views purporting a blunder. Disgusting? Maybe. Effective? 10k views say yes. You’re worried about 'theoretical destruction' by Black, while I’m worried about having fun and building a fast-growing club. If winning with a 'disgusting' opening is a crime, then call me a criminal. I’ll be over here celebrating my 'purported blunders' with my new members while you study your draws.

@francisludwigii said in #44:

Honestly, even if your comments weren’t suspiciously like that of an AI, and you weren’t “marked”, the fact that you are asking players to go for the Jerome is embarrassing. It’s a disgusting opening, and let me assure you, a good player with black WILL destroy white in any time format.
On a side note, congrats on getting so many views purporting a blunder.

Disgusting? Maybe. Effective? 10k views say yes. You’re worried about 'theoretical destruction' by Black, while I’m worried about having fun and building a fast-growing club. If winning with a 'disgusting' opening is a crime, then call me a criminal. I’ll be over here celebrating my 'purported blunders' with my new members while you study your draws.

Please stop using such generic chatbot replies. I'm sure you can write a few words on your own.
Nice to see you go quick to the personal attack, when I never mentioned anything about your own games.

@francisludwigii said in #44: > > Honestly, even if your comments weren’t suspiciously like that of an AI, and you weren’t “marked”, the fact that you are asking players to go for the Jerome is embarrassing. It’s a disgusting opening, and let me assure you, a good player with black WILL destroy white in any time format. > > On a side note, congrats on getting so many views purporting a blunder. > > Disgusting? Maybe. Effective? 10k views say yes. You’re worried about 'theoretical destruction' by Black, while I’m worried about having fun and building a fast-growing club. If winning with a 'disgusting' opening is a crime, then call me a criminal. I’ll be over here celebrating my 'purported blunders' with my new members while you study your draws. Please stop using such generic chatbot replies. I'm sure you can write a few words on your own. Nice to see you go quick to the personal attack, when I never mentioned anything about your own games.

..... yall gonna chillax? I’m still waiting for gambit 6

..... yall gonna chillax? I’m still waiting for gambit 6

Stop flaming each other so what if it’s even ai ? As long as people enjoy reading it, and understand it’s probably not good to play in tournaments and OTB, everything is fine it’s not causing any harm to anyone except for some people who just can’t stand harmless writing about a unreliable gambit

Stop flaming each other so what if it’s even ai ? As long as people enjoy reading it, and understand it’s probably not good to play in tournaments and OTB, everything is fine it’s not causing any harm to anyone except for some people who just can’t stand harmless writing about a unreliable gambit

@Lord_of_the_River said in #45:

Please stop using such generic chatbot replies. I'm sure you can write a few words on your own.
Nice to see you go quick to the personal attack, when I never mentioned anything about your own games.

Neither did I. Do you see a phrase there that said I mentioned any of your games? No, right? I only used general phrases. But let's just stop this entire quarrel and call a truce.

@Lord_of_the_River said in #45: > Please stop using such generic chatbot replies. I'm sure you can write a few words on your own. > Nice to see you go quick to the personal attack, when I never mentioned anything about your own games. Neither did I. Do you see a phrase there that said I mentioned any of your games? No, right? I only used general phrases. But let's just stop this entire quarrel and call a truce.

And I mean, besides, what is the point of quarreling? So yeah, let's just stop quarreling @Lord_of_the_River . Agreed?

And I mean, besides, what is the point of quarreling? So yeah, let's just stop quarreling @Lord_of_the_River . Agreed?

I’m not quarrelling with you man. @francisludwigii . Just make sure the analysis in the blog is double checked, as thousands of people will be seeing the lines, and many may take up the opening. That’s all.

I’m not quarrelling with you man. @francisludwigii . Just make sure the analysis in the blog is double checked, as thousands of people will be seeing the lines, and many may take up the opening. That’s all.