@Mindgames2026 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Z5RlIn5v)
> > > Still doesn't beat hiring a coach. Can't see myself using this feature. Ever.
> >
> > Your coach can't analyze hundreds of games in an instant, besides, this is completely free.
> > Edit: That doesn't mean that you shouldn't get a coach, it just means that this is actually useful.
>
> I'm in the minority camp that says that if you want a game analyzed, hire a coach. And if you can't afford a coach, don't bother analyzing games at all.
That is really weird because analyzing is really easy and useful.
You really don't need a coach to do that, a coach would help, sure.
But it's not necessary.
@chess_dragon2013 We will have to agree to disagree there. I will say nothing else.
@Mindgames2026 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Y2ZIHaZq)
> @chess_dragon2013 We will have to agree to disagree there. I will say nothing else.
I'm glad with that, I was just trying to help :]
I had this message
> Your report should be ready in about 7 minutes
I think the server eats ram like crazy and that's why they can't make too much publicity for it.
I'm hoping at some point in the future Tutor is extended to variant games as well. Would be great to have some insights into my atomic....
weird to say this, but the tutor might be underrated.
Most of the time I hate such "insights" tools with passion, but this one can be quite useful. However, there is still plenty of opportunities to misinterpret the data (e.g. you can have high opening and low endgame scores just as a consequence of spending more time early)
@nrizwan said [^](/forum/redirect/post/uk8ua73e)
> I'm hoping at some point in the future Tutor is extended to variant games as well. Would be great to have some insights into my atomic....
Tutor does do varients ,but you must play a game of that varient within the time frame of games it analyzes.