I think i like your idea a lot. Thanks for making a web site showing the concept.
seems like now even zero arithmetic sum but not zero "norm" (sum of absolute varlue of both pressure component) would have some green shading. if i am not mistaken now , or before. i like it. (i did check with the counts, good reverse understanding filter for me). if i did not imagine before and now after being new. well. now if looking good. wondering if I can get to make associations without full board intensity surfaces keeping both side contribution to the locations of the pieces. why I woudl like that at the end one could linger a bit longer. (i can pause of the last guess though, but my idiosyncratic self, lol, is itching to be able to see the success and bask in the full information on all squares not just the ones with material on it. but the full board in the face, with the third wheel, that I find intriguiging to learn long term.. at least try. i think it has not been tried before. most heatmaps are about material location statistics. not the actualy mobiilility figures that actually make us not even need to know the name of the piece. (well sort of, there are those small measure-probability cases for the castly and en passant, but is the bulk of chess needing to trip over that always. .. there might be some time, when or if this makes sense as a new angle to absorbing chess information of the board kind (more than the move sequences kind, although even that might be sketched through .... the more things make sense, the more i like to extend further, pardon me, but this is great even if not ecompassing the ad-hoc rules. or the worm-hole special configurations modbilities. forget i even mention that..
good job. i feel like now I can increase the pace a bit. I would venture to say that I am gessing pawns increasingly from the spatial density surfaces i see, but never know when both brains at having fun at it. but before I would be betting on the shapes of teh locatin points. as possible pawn island structures. the penablty would not be so bad.
now i become more conscious of the concetp of hole. and superpositin of other pressures making still relative holes. (the coutns would also do that i know, but that feel clunky to me, i am biased toward smooth stuff, either innate or warped early or professionally past life).
techically. now afterthoughts while trying to wind down, and still no control over those. too late. caslting not there, pawn jump not there, but that made me realise. neither are the pawn move forward.
not a problem. I think the priority in ensemble basking or bathing (english not my first language, never as subtle as native language, coarse grain of lexical access, at least not on all topics I might have dabbled or am trying to figure out by babbling a lot around it, as one might have noticed, here and then, occasionally). is to square being defened or not. this is static. any piece can me moved in foresight chess being not yet move chess and all the moves are still up in the air. even the turn does not have to be specified. we are in core layers of the ruleset. ... not even turn can ruiin the fun yet. or in other words we see both turn in one exercise.. great. did not compute that before i decided to ramble here.
I just need to refer for those pressure (or intensity or density) of 2 dimensions on each point (small square center, if you will, nimzo calls them so, from a likely graph point of view, that the pieces volumes are just so we can have chess made physical locomotable things on a board.. they need thickness. and our brains are made for that euclidian space, I mean the stupid acting brain, but slow uptage one on the logic (it still does logic if logic is part of the data, and the data is well sampling of the iniherent logic abiding mechanisitc ruleset, in physics and in chess, the illusions and fooling at large scale are propbaly due to the input dimensional gapss).
where was I.. guarding pressure is what i should call those board supported functions you show. guarding figures. not exactly mobility figure completely, as pawn mode / capture like no other moving thing amonbg the 5 desinators (PBNRQK) oups that is 6 . (did i mention my high counting error rate, 1, 2, many, mediium finite, big finite, atrociously unfathomable big finite, but then infinite, and ahh... peace of mind, release, strangely, uncertainng and infinite are more fathomable. must have bad wiring inside, or maybe that is my stupid brain talking. . from a inherent locomotable logical physcial world stupid intutive brain staitisticl learning on top of the more conscious will having us gone through the RL of facing the floor with all mechanicial logic on our body in that 3D space logic implied, and statistically available to be correctly sampled. One need safety environment of course).
sorry for the extra solilogque.. it felt right here. but who knows. i can always move this. did i close all my openparentheses, or alternatively finishi the thoughts that they were interupting. I hope I had enough redundancy among those noodle segemnts for the intuitive reader to have their own imagination going. i hope.
idea. I have a thing for toying with my perception (also NDpatzer blogs had some examples but those were not self-paced, it is more fun when one is in control). I name the "Now you see it" and "Now you don't".
And since you have many "channels" or spolt light filters, or ?... I was thinking for those of us still able to find a keyboard lying around, that maybe having like a first person shooter keympas (I would use my left hand, my keyboard is new, I can still read WASD on it (not true, e now gone, and top of ASD letters as well, but that could be my ramblings over past 5 years, and a quarter).
Shortcut keys (I was kidding about the particular keys, but i don't think the letters should be used as mnemonics they should be groupe for one hand touch typing (my neck would thank you, as I could still lazy look posture my self without both hand forward, or having to look at keyboard to aim while my mind in basking (or was it bathing) in the lights of your fantastic idea made web site..
ok. Did I bury the idea? WASD would be a wink though. (others like e q x maybe c but f is easy and G too (for landing gear or grenade).
me of another planet of computery thingies... I like the mouse to visual gaze instant syncronization that all the new gizmos has lost. position encoding, the others are blurry touch or the worse: speed encoding. (console borg).