A beat a GM in a simul can any title player will check my game ?

"What is this"

A clear sign that you need to visit https://lichess.org/account/kid

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

Hi, pls be nice in the chat otherwise i will report u.
I beat GM Zhigalko Andrey Sir in a simul game with almost 97 accuracy it is good or not?
Can anyone tell me who has knowldege about chess like a title player ir a strong player .

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

So , beating GM Andrey is not a big thing ???

This is a good result, a mini-achievement. Nothing more, nothing less. However, it's important to consider the following (you're unreasonably, much more proud than you should be, about this victory, as is evident from your comments in another thread. You've suddenly started considering yourself a chess super-god, judging by your words in that thread, from your mini-achievement). Many have beaten him (grandmaster Andrey Zhigalko) in his simuls; it's not a particularly difficult task. He gives himself very little time per simul, thus giving many a chance to beat him. He deliberately gives many such a chance; he could take twice as much time (that's the average for other simul players on Lichess), and then his opponents would score far fewer points against him. Plus, he competes strongly against the highest-rated players in simuls, and often doesn't have time to catch up with the rest. With your ratings, you're in that group of others. And, for example, I've beaten him several times (not just once, like you) and drawn with him in his sessions. My score in his sessions is currently 5.5:7.5. Moreover, he competes with me much, much more than the average player in a session. I'm usually #1 in his sessions by rating, and only occasionally #2, and I'm never lower than #2. Here are my wins and draws against him in his simultaneous displays (and you can see for yourself my score against him: 5.5:7.5):

@IamNOTamod said ^

Even I (rated above 2000) can't defeat Andrey Zhigalko, and I have tried multiple times. So seeing a lower-rated player pull it off, I would agree with Rabbit's conclusion.

I've noticed that he plays very differently against different players: the higher the player's rating, the more he fights against them. He fights especially hard against the highest-rated opponents, spending most of the session thinking about how to beat them. And against the lowest-rated players, he plays almost without thinking. He plays against them on autopilot. I notice a very noticeable difference in the quality of his play in his games. That's why even very low-rated chess players often score points against him. In his sessions, I'm almost always #1 rated (my rating in sessions against him was in the 2300-2348 range), only rarely #2 rated, and I've never been lower than #2 rated. My score against him is currently 5.5:7.5. But I've seen that some players with a much lower rating than me have scores against him that aren't colossally lower than mine. For example, a player with a 1700 rating can have a score against him 2:8. I studied why this happens. After all, the difference in scores should be colossally greater. And I saw that he competes at very different levels against different players. I don't know if it's intentional or not. Perhaps it's unintentional: he simply sees that he's having problems against strong players, and spends much more time thinking about moves against them. And meanwhile, he completely forgets about the weaker ones. He does something against them on autopilot, and then suddenly, bam, he misses something. Or he simply forgot about them and wasted time. I've even seen this in his games. Something like this: the opponent has a rating of about 1600, the grandmaster has a 100% winning position, about a rook more material, but he loses on time.

Ya i know that it is bot abig thing . But this was my first time when i played with a GM . i have played only one game with a super GM . and i win the game . i dont know what to do .right now in this forum

You played very well congrats
Keep it up and you can also become a brilliant player.