In this game my opponent thought he might save some time by premoving if I hopped in with the N.
However I chose a more forcing path that coincidentally started on the same square, and suddenly he is completely lost because of his premove :D
The variant is three check, but actually this would have resulted in a loss in a normal game as well ;-)
https://lichess.org/gJUOVbRs/black#13
In this game my opponent thought he might save some time by premoving if I hopped in with the N.
However I chose a more forcing path that coincidentally started on the same square, and suddenly he is completely lost because of his premove :D
The variant is three check, but actually this would have resulted in a loss in a normal game as well ;-)
https://lichess.org/gJUOVbRs/black#13
Neat that if he had played 10. Kg1, you just go back with Ng3 and he has no way to stop a check on the next move.
Neat that if he had played 10. Kg1, you just go back with Ng3 and he has no way to stop a check on the next move.
@plopsky said ^
In this game my opponent thought he might save some time by premoving if I hopped in with the N.
However I chose a more forcing path that coincidentally started on the same square, and suddenly he is completely lost because of his premove :D
The variant is three check, but actually this would have resulted in a loss in a normal game as well ;-)
https://lichess.org/gJUOVbRs/black#13
To premove is dangarus also to burserk is dangarus too
@plopsky said [^](/forum/redirect/post/VqcTbjlX)
> In this game my opponent thought he might save some time by premoving if I hopped in with the N.
> However I chose a more forcing path that coincidentally started on the same square, and suddenly he is completely lost because of his premove :D
> The variant is three check, but actually this would have resulted in a loss in a normal game as well ;-)
>
> https://lichess.org/gJUOVbRs/black#13
To premove is dangarus also to burserk is dangarus too