Any Explanation of This? • page 1/1 • Game Analysis • lichess.org

I have 39 centi , and opp 42, so Why he was in lead all the time lol?

https://lichess.org/jKKMUj7F/black#3

I have 39 centi , and opp 42, so Why he was in lead all the time lol? https://lichess.org/jKKMUj7F/black#3

Yes, the explanation is quite simple... If the game had ended on move 42 (by him playing f3 mate), then the analysis would show you with basically the same 39 cpl (maybe a couple higher) as you have now. Your opponent however would have 17 cpl, consistent with him being better throughout, and you would not be surprised.

His 43rd move is spectacularly bad, and it changes a forced mate (with is treated as +10 for cpl calculations) to 0.00, which is a loss 0f 1000 cp in that move. 1000/44 moves, means that it increased is average by an extra 23 cpl.

Yes, the explanation is quite simple... If the game had ended on move 42 (by him playing f3 mate), then the analysis would show you with basically the same 39 cpl (maybe a couple higher) as you have now. Your opponent however would have 17 cpl, consistent with him being better throughout, and you would not be surprised. His 43rd move is spectacularly bad, and it changes a forced mate (with is treated as +10 for cpl calculations) to 0.00, which is a loss 0f 1000 cp in that move. 1000/44 moves, means that it increased is average by an extra 23 cpl.

aVague

edited

@CG314 said ^

Yes, the explanation is quite simple... If the game had ended on move 42 (by him playing f3 mate), then the analysis would show you with basically the same 39 cpl (maybe a couple higher) as you have now. Your opponent however would have 17 cpl, consistent with him being better throughout, and you would not be surprised.

His 43rd move is spectacularly bad, and it changes a forced mate (with is treated as +10 for cpl calculations) to 0.00, which is a loss 0f 1000 cp in that move. 1000/44 moves, means that it increased is average by an extra 23 cpl.

I see Thx

@CG314 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/niTBpSsJ) > Yes, the explanation is quite simple... If the game had ended on move 42 (by him playing f3 mate), then the analysis would show you with basically the same 39 cpl (maybe a couple higher) as you have now. Your opponent however would have 17 cpl, consistent with him being better throughout, and you would not be surprised. > > His 43rd move is spectacularly bad, and it changes a forced mate (with is treated as +10 for cpl calculations) to 0.00, which is a loss 0f 1000 cp in that move. 1000/44 moves, means that it increased is average by an extra 23 cpl. I see Thx