lichess.org
Donate

Beating a super GM

[@]Vanshsharmaaa said ^

And also this forum is for game anaysis if dont want to see u can go . I dont want to do trash talk with u id....ts

Humm... (@)shadow1414 should you.. O-O at this?

[@]Vanshsharmaaa said [^](/forum/redirect/post/smmBR7js) > And also this forum is for game anaysis if dont want to see u can go . I dont want to do trash talk with u id....ts Humm... (@)shadow1414 should you.. **O-O** at this?

@Vanshsharmaaa congratulations you did a record to get loser reaction 30+ strick!

@Vanshsharmaaa congratulations you did a record to get loser reaction 30+ strick!

Bro you genuinely got ratioed in blog :).
Beating GMs in simul doesnt mean a 1700 has raw talent!

https://lichess.org/8UNVcENm/white
- I beat an active Super GM 2650 in an official pan arm event simul with 7ppl

You even had the audacity to go the game of the month and say-
Vanshsharmaaa I dont think so thats very good game
Vanshsharmaaa I played with a GM and beat him with 92 accuracy
Vanshsharmaaa And i did not win the contest
Screenshot 2026-07-28 193414.png

Bro you genuinely got ratioed in blog :). Beating GMs in simul doesnt mean a 1700 has raw talent! https://lichess.org/8UNVcENm/white - I beat an active Super GM 2650 in an official pan arm event simul with 7ppl You even had the audacity to go the game of the month and say- Vanshsharmaaa I dont think so thats very good game Vanshsharmaaa I played with a GM and beat him with 92 accuracy Vanshsharmaaa And i did not win the contest ![Screenshot 2026-07-28 193414.png](https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&h=0&op=resize&path=g6CgAOXI_kkh.png&w=864&sig=76de4aee6132086680824d634c36e95fdefdd8e1)

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

I beat a suoer GM fide i am a raw talent from india my peak was 2400 on chess.com here i beat him

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

Hi everyone i can make a study but i have no time now as a studnet
You can check my game on my profile with GM Zhigalko Andrey 2626 fide it is about 2 weeks and i dont know how can i share that game here
Regards vansh sharma
Edit - I have shared the game u all can check and NM also

You beat grandmaster Andrey Zhigalko once in a simultaneous exhibition, and you're basing everything in this thread on that? But many have beaten him in his exhibitions; it's not a particularly difficult task. He gives himself very little time per exhibition, giving many others a chance to beat him. Plus, he competes strongly against the highest-rated players in exhibitions, often missing out on the rest. With your ratings, you're in that group of the rest. And, for example, I've beaten him and drawn against him several times (not just once, like you). My score in his exhibitions is currently 5.5:7.5. Moreover, he competes with me much, much more than the average player in an exhibition. I'm usually #1 rated in his exhibitions, and only occasionally #2 rated, and I'm never lower than #2 rated. Here are my wins and draws against him in his simultaneous displays (and you can see for yourself my score against him: 5.5:7.5):

https://lichess.org/AvANpS0B#59

https://lichess.org/jcuKugoy#73

https://lichess.org/xAlY0uNw/black#96

https://lichess.org/rXJLURBv/black#103

https://lichess.org/Sj631LCE#45

https://lichess.org/b4pQFpA7/black#40

https://lichess.org/gexbBd08#46

These are my four wins against him plus my three draws, and in total, he and I have played 13 games in his simultaneous displays so far.
I showed you above my wins and draws only against Andrey Zhigalko in his simultaneous exhibitions (after one victory over him in his simultaneous exhibition, you suddenly started thinking of yourself as a chess super-god). I've beaten grandmasters not only in simultaneous exhibitions, but also in regular games (one against the other). But, unlike you, I don't consider myself a chess super-god based on that. I haven't even studied chess for over 26 years now. I just studied a little chess as a child many, many, many years ago, and since then I've been objectively quite good at playing. I was never a chess prodigy.

@Vanshsharmaaa said [^](/forum/redirect/post/QPZq0Pce) > I beat a suoer GM fide i am a raw talent from india my peak was 2400 on chess.com here i beat him @Vanshsharmaaa said [^](/forum/redirect/post/V79iQehf) > Hi everyone i can make a study but i have no time now as a studnet > You can check my game on my profile with GM Zhigalko Andrey 2626 fide it is about 2 weeks and i dont know how can i share that game here > Regards vansh sharma > Edit - I have shared the game u all can check and NM also You beat grandmaster Andrey Zhigalko once in a simultaneous exhibition, and you're basing everything in this thread on that? But many have beaten him in his exhibitions; it's not a particularly difficult task. He gives himself very little time per exhibition, giving many others a chance to beat him. Plus, he competes strongly against the highest-rated players in exhibitions, often missing out on the rest. With your ratings, you're in that group of the rest. And, for example, I've beaten him and drawn against him several times (not just once, like you). My score in his exhibitions is currently 5.5:7.5. Moreover, he competes with me much, much more than the average player in an exhibition. I'm usually #1 rated in his exhibitions, and only occasionally #2 rated, and I'm never lower than #2 rated. Here are my wins and draws against him in his simultaneous displays (and you can see for yourself my score against him: 5.5:7.5): https://lichess.org/AvANpS0B#59 https://lichess.org/jcuKugoy#73 https://lichess.org/xAlY0uNw/black#96 https://lichess.org/rXJLURBv/black#103 https://lichess.org/Sj631LCE#45 https://lichess.org/b4pQFpA7/black#40 https://lichess.org/gexbBd08#46 These are my four wins against him plus my three draws, and in total, he and I have played 13 games in his simultaneous displays so far. I showed you above my wins and draws only against Andrey Zhigalko in his simultaneous exhibitions (after one victory over him in his simultaneous exhibition, you suddenly started thinking of yourself as a chess super-god). I've beaten grandmasters not only in simultaneous exhibitions, but also in regular games (one against the other). But, unlike you, I don't consider myself a chess super-god based on that. I haven't even studied chess for over 26 years now. I just studied a little chess as a child many, many, many years ago, and since then I've been objectively quite good at playing. I was never a chess prodigy.

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

I beat a suoer GM fide i am a raw talent from india my peak was 2400 on chess.com here i beat him

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

Hi everyone i can make a study but i have no time now as a studnet
You can check my game on my profile with GM Zhigalko Andrey 2626 fide it is about 2 weeks and i dont know how can i share that game here
Regards vansh sharma
Edit - I have shared the game u all can check and NM also

And one more thing. What are you telling us here (without evidence) about your huge ratings (supposedly 2400 on another site) on another site? We see your ratings on Lichess here! Your ratings on Lichess are colossally-colossally-colossally lower than what you're trying to claim for yourself here. There's no way the same person can play at such colossally-colossally-colossally different levels on different sites. You're telling us (without evidence) that you supposedly have such ratings on another site that you could beat a chess player with your rating on Lichess approximately 100:1 (here 1 is, for example, a disconnect). These are colossally-colossally-colossally different levels. Your ratings here on Lichess are generally just normal for a boy who recently started playing chess. No more, no less. Millions of boys who recently started playing chess have approximately the same level of play. No more, no less.

@Vanshsharmaaa said [^](/forum/redirect/post/QPZq0Pce) > I beat a suoer GM fide i am a raw talent from india my peak was 2400 on chess.com here i beat him @Vanshsharmaaa said [^](/forum/redirect/post/V79iQehf) > Hi everyone i can make a study but i have no time now as a studnet > You can check my game on my profile with GM Zhigalko Andrey 2626 fide it is about 2 weeks and i dont know how can i share that game here > Regards vansh sharma > Edit - I have shared the game u all can check and NM also And one more thing. What are you telling us here (without evidence) about your huge ratings (supposedly 2400 on another site) on another site? We see your ratings on Lichess here! Your ratings on Lichess are colossally-colossally-colossally lower than what you're trying to claim for yourself here. There's no way the same person can play at such colossally-colossally-colossally different levels on different sites. You're telling us (without evidence) that you supposedly have such ratings on another site that you could beat a chess player with your rating on Lichess approximately 100:1 (here 1 is, for example, a disconnect). These are colossally-colossally-colossally different levels. Your ratings here on Lichess are generally just normal for a boy who recently started playing chess. No more, no less. Millions of boys who recently started playing chess have approximately the same level of play. No more, no less.

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

I beat a suoer GM fide i am a raw talent from india my peak was 2400 on chess.com here i beat him

@Vanshsharmaaa said ^

Hi everyone i can make a study but i have no time now as a studnet
You can check my game on my profile with GM Zhigalko Andrey 2626 fide it is about 2 weeks and i dont know how can i share that game here
Regards vansh sharma
Edit - I have shared the game u all can check and NM also

And one more thing. For example, I played at the same level of strength as your current ratings on Lichess when I was about 11 years old (that was 30 years ago). I was not a prodigy. And at 15 (26 years ago), I was already playing at about the same level as now (you can see my ratings on my Lichess page). I was not a prodigy. The expected score (hypothetically) between me at 15 and me at 11 is about 27:1. Mathematically, according to the rating calculation formulas, this is approximately the forecast. I took for comparison levels of about 2300 in rapid on Lichess and about 1700 in rapid on Lichess. A difference of 600 rating points exactly means this. The expected score in a head-to-head matchup of two such players (with a difference of 600 rating points) is about 27:1. I advise you to think about everything I've told you above. Don't misinform yourself and others (some intentionally, some unintentionally). Especially about your supposed 2400 rating on another site, compared to the ratings we can all see on your Lichess page.

@Vanshsharmaaa said [^](/forum/redirect/post/QPZq0Pce) > I beat a suoer GM fide i am a raw talent from india my peak was 2400 on chess.com here i beat him @Vanshsharmaaa said [^](/forum/redirect/post/V79iQehf) > Hi everyone i can make a study but i have no time now as a studnet > You can check my game on my profile with GM Zhigalko Andrey 2626 fide it is about 2 weeks and i dont know how can i share that game here > Regards vansh sharma > Edit - I have shared the game u all can check and NM also And one more thing. For example, I played at the same level of strength as your current ratings on Lichess when I was about 11 years old (that was 30 years ago). I was not a prodigy. And at 15 (26 years ago), I was already playing at about the same level as now (you can see my ratings on my Lichess page). I was not a prodigy. The expected score (hypothetically) between me at 15 and me at 11 is about 27:1. Mathematically, according to the rating calculation formulas, this is approximately the forecast. I took for comparison levels of about 2300 in rapid on Lichess and about 1700 in rapid on Lichess. A difference of 600 rating points exactly means this. The expected score in a head-to-head matchup of two such players (with a difference of 600 rating points) is about 27:1. I advise you to think about everything I've told you above. Don't misinform yourself and others (some intentionally, some unintentionally). Especially about your supposed 2400 rating on another site, compared to the ratings we can all see on your Lichess page.

@bufferunderrun @Sergioglorias can we already close this thread? It has long turned into a roasting warfare.

@bufferunderrun @Sergioglorias can we already close this thread? It has long turned into a roasting warfare.

@TheMagnusAura said ^

@bufferunderrun @Sergioglorias can we already close this thread? It has long turned into a roasting warfare.

Sergioglorias is NOTamod Mr genius

@TheMagnusAura said [^](/forum/redirect/post/AxCxpQbG) > @bufferunderrun @Sergioglorias can we already close this thread? It has long turned into a roasting warfare. **Sergioglorias** is NOTamod Mr genius

@TheMagnusAura said ^

can we already close this thread? It has long turned into a roasting warfare.

Roasting warfare is diabolical :D

@TheMagnusAura said [^](/forum/redirect/post/AxCxpQbG) > can we already close this thread? It has long turned into a roasting warfare. Roasting warfare is diabolical :D

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.