colle game with early Bg4 c4

what do you think about the game?

[Event "Blitz"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/F5Xw3iAv"]
[Date "2026.07.20"]
[Round "-"]
[White "relax2600"]
[Black "JosePaulino"]
[Result "1-0"]
[GameId "F5Xw3iAv"]
[UTCDate "2026.07.20"]
[UTCTime "16:21:50"]
[WhiteElo "1837"]
[BlackElo "2100"]
[WhiteRatingDiff "+10"]
[BlackRatingDiff "-9"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "300+0"]
[ECO "A46"]
[Opening "Indian Defense: Wade-Tartakower Defense"]
[Termination "Normal"]
[Annotator "lichess.org"]

1. d4 { [%eval 0.15] [%clk 0:05:00] } 1... d6 { [%eval 0.6] [%clk 0:05:00] } 2. Nf3 { [%eval 0.48] [%clk 0:04:58] } 2... Nf6 { [%eval 0.43] [%clk 0:04:59] } { A46 Indian Defense: Wade-Tartakower Defense } 3. e3 { [%eval 0.17] [%clk 0:04:58] } 3... Bg4?! { (0.17 0.72) Inaccuracy. g6 was best. } { [%eval 0.72] [%clk 0:04:56] } (3... g6 4. c4 Bg7 5. Nc3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. dxe5 dxe5 8. Qxd8) 4. c4 { [%eval 0.65] [%clk 0:04:56] } 4... c5 { [%eval 0.83] [%clk 0:04:51] } 5. Nc3 { [%eval 0.62] [%clk 0:04:55] } 5... cxd4 { [%eval 0.7] [%clk 0:04:50] } 6. exd4 { [%eval 0.81] [%clk 0:04:53] } 6... Nc6 { [%eval 1.04] [%clk 0:04:49] } 7. Be3 { [%eval 0.54] [%clk 0:04:51] } 7... e5 { [%eval 0.96] [%clk 0:04:45] } 8. dxe5?! { (0.96 0.19) Inaccuracy. Be2 was best. } { [%eval 0.19] [%clk 0:04:48] } (8. Be2 Be7 9. h3 Bxf3 10. Bxf3 O-O 11. O-O Nd7 12. dxe5 dxe5) 8... Nxe5?! { (0.19 1.24) Inaccuracy. dxe5 was best. } { [%eval 1.24] [%clk 0:04:44] } (8... dxe5 9. a3 Nd4 10. Be2 Nxe2 11. Qxe2 e4 12. Bg5 Qe7 13. Bxf6 gxf6 14. Qxe4) 9. Be2 { [%eval 1.32] [%clk 0:04:44] } 9... Be7?! { (1.32 2.21) Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best. } { [%eval 2.21] [%clk 0:04:34] } (9... Bd7 10. Qd4 Nc6 11. Qf4 Be7 12. h3 O-O 13. Rd1 Re8 14. Rd2 Bf8 15. O-O) 10. O-O?! { (2.21 1.23) Inaccuracy. Nxe5 was best. } { [%eval 1.23] [%clk 0:04:38] } (10. Nxe5 Bxe2 11. Qa4+ Kf8 12. Nxf7 Kxf7 13. Nxe2 Qd7 14. Qb3 Rac8 15. Nf4 g5) 10... Nxf3+ { [%eval 1.55] [%clk 0:04:26] } 11. Bxf3 { [%eval 1.61] [%clk 0:04:36] } 11... h5 { [%eval 2.22] [%clk 0:04:25] } 12. b3 { [%eval 2.05] [%clk 0:04:35] } 12... Bxf3 { [%eval 2.2] [%clk 0:04:09] } 13. Qxf3 { [%eval 2.18] [%clk 0:04:33] } 13... Ng4?! { (2.18 3.06) Inaccuracy. Qd7 was best. } { [%eval 3.06] [%clk 0:04:08] } (13... Qd7 14. Rad1 O-O 15. h3 a6 16. Bd4 Rfe8 17. Rfe1 h4 18. Bxf6 Bxf6 19. Nd5) 14. Qxb7 { [%eval 2.49] [%clk 0:04:25] } 14... Bf6 { [%eval 2.97] [%clk 0:04:06] } 15. Qc6+ { [%eval 3.22] [%clk 0:04:21] } 15... Kf8 { [%eval 3.04] [%clk 0:04:03] } 16. Rac1?! { (3.04 2.25) Inaccuracy. Bd2 was best. } { [%eval 2.25] [%clk 0:04:06] } (16. Bd2 Rc8 17. Qb7 g6 18. Rae1 Kg7 19. h3 Be5 20. Re2 Rc5 21. Qxa7 Re8) 16... Be5 { [%eval 2.16] [%clk 0:04:00] } 17. h3 { [%eval 2.12] [%clk 0:03:53] } 17... Rc8 { [%eval 2.54] [%clk 0:03:18] } 18. Qd5?! { (2.54 1.87) Inaccuracy. Qe4 was best. } { [%eval 1.87] [%clk 0:03:44] } (18. Qe4 Nxe3 19. Qxe3 Qa5 20. Rfd1 Rh6 21. Rd5 Qa6 22. Rc2 Re6 23. Qf3 g6) 18... Bh2+?! { (1.87 3.21) Inaccuracy. Nxe3 was best. } { [%eval 3.21] [%clk 0:02:54] } (18... Nxe3 19. fxe3 Qe7 20. Rf3 Bxc3 21. Rxc3 Kg8 22. Rd3 Rh6 23. Rd4 Re6 24. Rdf4) 19. Kh1 { [%eval 3.19] [%clk 0:03:41] } 19... Qh4? { (3.19 5.83) Mistake. Be5 was best. } { [%eval 5.83] [%clk 0:02:53] } (19... Be5 20. Bxa7 Rh6 21. f3 Kg8 22. fxg4 hxg4 23. Qxf7+ Kh8 24. Qf5 gxh3 25. g3) 20. Ne4 { [%eval 5.14] [%clk 0:03:15] } 20... Be5 { [%eval 6.06] [%clk 0:02:39] } 21. Bg5 { [%eval 5.94] [%clk 0:02:55] } 21... Nxf2+ { [%eval 7.19] [%clk 0:02:33] } 22. Rxf2 { [%eval 7.04] [%clk 0:02:53] } 22... Qxf2 { [%eval 7.24] [%clk 0:02:01] } 23. Nxf2 { [%eval 7.34] [%clk 0:02:42] } 23... g6 { [%eval 7.73] [%clk 0:01:59] } 24. Be3 { [%eval 7.04] [%clk 0:02:37] } 24... Rg8 { [%eval 7.78] [%clk 0:01:45] } 25. Nd3 { [%eval 7.78] [%clk 0:02:33] } 25... Bg3 { [%eval 8.86] [%clk 0:01:34] } 26. Rf1 { [%eval 9.25] [%clk 0:02:29] } 26... f5 { [%eval 8.42] [%clk 0:01:32] } 27. Nf4 { [%eval 8.28] [%clk 0:02:25] } 27... Re8 { [%eval 9.56] [%clk 0:00:56] } 28. Qxd6+ { [%eval #12] [%clk 0:02:21] } 28... Kf7 { [%eval 11.24] [%clk 0:00:55] } 29. Qd5+ { [%eval 10.41] [%clk 0:02:16] } 29... Kg7 { [%eval 12.12] [%clk 0:00:51] } 30. Ne6+ { [%eval 8.54] [%clk 0:02:09] } 30... Kf6? { (8.54 Mate in 3) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Rxe6 was best. } { [%eval #3] [%clk 0:00:37] } (30... Rxe6 31. Qxe6 Kh7 32. Bd4 Rg7 33. Qe8 Bf2 34. Bxf2 Rg8 35. Qe7+ Rg7 36. Qe6) 31. Bg5+ { [%eval #2] [%clk 0:01:50] } 31... Kf7 { [%eval #2] [%clk 0:00:33] } 32. Nd8+ { [%eval #3] [%clk 0:01:43] } 32... Kf8 { [%eval #1] [%clk 0:00:25] } { Black resigns. } 1-0

I was playing against a friend and he accused me of cheating, I was white
I went with the colle aiming for the zukertort (with b3) but once he played 5.Bg4 I know white gets slightly better by playing c4 possible with ideas of Qb3 but anyway Iam playing a friend Iam literally not going to press
7 e5 I felt it was premature what I was thinking was something along the lines of trading pieces on f3 white gets pawns doubled but at least is an easy draw
12 b3 looks horrible but I dont like to keep the pawns just hanging
13 Ng4 just seems like an horrible blunder
16 Rc1 instead of Be2 its not the best for the engine but makes perfect sense to me, my idea was simply removing the R from the pin, and in case of NxB I would get the semi open file for my rook
18 Qd5 the computer doesnt like it, but I went there because Iam looking for NxB I felt like that would simplify my game
19 Qh4 I noticed the Q has no squares it would be lost
20 Ne4 21 Bg5 it should be 1-0 but he kept playing
I believe it was by move 24 or 25 I offered a draw because I literally didnt want to win because of a free queen
he didnt even saw it and kept playing
by move 28 Iam just looking to win material but he forces himself into mate.

After the game he accused me of cheating, his reasoning was because I made no blunders...

What pisses me off is the guy reported me on the 20, and yesterday I get actually suspended because I destroyed a few 2100+ patzers in a row on a bullet tournament and they definitely went crying to lichess, And since this dude reported me earlier he probably got a notification someone you reported got banned, horrible timing for me but so be it I will just make it public nothing to hide, check this game to see if I cheated or not.

#For the mods before you just delete this
A) Iam not accusing anyone of cheating I was the one accused
B) It is not an open investigation as the game that Iam accused of is probably a different game, and in any case Iam the one who is affected and I don't mind at all that all information is available I have nothing to hide
C) Acusing others of cheating without any reason is a much bigger offense

@relax2600 said ^

I was playing against a friend and he accused me of cheating

Don't you mean an ex-friend?

@relax2600 I didn't find any games where you used engine assistance. False positives do happen. Explain the moderators why it is a false positive here https://lichess.org/appeal

@MrPushwood said ^

I was playing against a friend and he accused me of cheating

Don't you mean an ex-friend?

Hopefully not, there's still a small chance on the appeal I only asked for them to review this game and tell if there was any cheating here, the plan is getting irrefutable official proof maybe that solves it.

Damn they seem to have removed the accusation for cheating with engine assistance, but now they went with cheating by rating manipulation
The worst part is no one wrote anything confirming no cheat was detected, so thanks to lichess automatic message that" someone you reported got banned" he is going to keep believing he is the best cheat detector in the world and will keep reporting a new guy everyday lol

"they seem to have removed the accusation for cheating with engine assistance, but now they went with cheating by rating manipulation"

The moderators wouldn't do this.

@IamNOTamod said ^

"they seem to have removed the accusation for cheating with engine assistance, but now they went with cheating by rating manipulation"

The moderators wouldn't do this.

cheat Appeal closed

boost Appeal in progress

I guess as usual you are wrong... If you still have doubts about the F screenshot I give 0 F about this account I will gladly give you the login password if you need to look by yourself the silly appeal.

As gm Finegold would put it "truth hurts"

also look at the timings from cheat appeal closed and from boost appeal in progress. I would need to be a twisted genius to even do Photoshop on the F hours of the appeal for them to match, and what would I F get from this?

Obviously couldn't care less about the account, I don't care about ranking online or offline. I don't care about my own privacy, I don't even care enough to contest a bogus accusation of boosting so I just accepted it, can't be much more transparent and public. All I F want as I stated originally was ignored and I will definitely be ignored again would be a F reply from any mod on the appeal saying something along the lines A) from as far as we can tell there was no engine assistance on the mentioned game.
But mods will not do it, because they are humans and they are proud, the rationale will be this dude is a f_$ing cheat he sandbagged in other games, talked about them publicly in the forum I will not give him this satisfaction.
That's all good I would most probably do the same myself, I have no illusions, what they are missing is they are complicating their own life because the dude that reported me for engine assistance does that almost every week to some other guys that might have or might not have actually cheated against him, because there are no consequences