also how really press with rooks vs queen, are 2 rooks often better than queen in ending?
https://lichess.org/npE6kPRO/black#87
also how really press with rooks vs queen, are 2 rooks often better than queen in ending?
https://lichess.org/npE6kPRO/black#87
*Did you see...
why here is 92 acc with zero mistakes, shouldn't it be like 99?
https://lichess.org/GvNXmqYn/black#5
why here is 92 acc with zero mistakes, shouldn't it be like 99?
https://lichess.org/GvNXmqYn/black#5
@aVague said ^
why here is 92 acc with zero mistakes, shouldn't it be like 99?
https://lichess.org/GvNXmqYn/black#5
You have some inaccurate move actually, like move 6. Nc6 and 8. b6... (Stockfish didn't tell, but thanks to the eval bar)
@aVague said [^](/forum/redirect/post/63QiwHO1)
> why here is 92 acc with zero mistakes, shouldn't it be like 99?
> https://lichess.org/GvNXmqYn/black#5
You have some inaccurate move actually, like move 6. Nc6 and 8. b6... (Stockfish didn't tell, but thanks to the eval bar)
@an7cplayingchess said ^
why here is 92 acc with zero mistakes, shouldn't it be like 99?
https://lichess.org/GvNXmqYn/black#5
You have some inaccurate move actually, like move 6. Nc6 and 8. b6... (Stockfish didn't tell, but thanks to the eval bar)
I don't quite see whats wrong with this moves nc6 and b6, eval bar can change, but that doesn't means it's really that bad , if to outplay position by SF lines
@an7cplayingchess said [^](/forum/redirect/post/wKWUnTf4)
> > why here is 92 acc with zero mistakes, shouldn't it be like 99?
> > https://lichess.org/GvNXmqYn/black#5
>
> You have some inaccurate move actually, like move 6. Nc6 and 8. b6... (Stockfish didn't tell, but thanks to the eval bar)
I don't quite see whats wrong with this moves nc6 and b6, eval bar can change, but that doesn't means it's really that bad , if to outplay position by SF lines
@aVague Sorry, but I am not the guy who gave you eval bar, or accuracy. You can "appeal" Stockfish...
@aVague Sorry, but I am not the guy who gave you eval bar, or accuracy. You can "appeal" Stockfish...
@an7cplayingchess said ^
@aVague Sorry, but I am not the guy who gave you eval bar, or accuracy. You can "appeal" Stockfish...
yes xD but I just asked for Your own vision, if YOu believe his majestry SF
@an7cplayingchess said [^](/forum/redirect/post/omBJeCR7)
> @aVague Sorry, but I am not the guy who gave you eval bar, or accuracy. You can "appeal" Stockfish...
yes xD but I just asked for Your own vision, if YOu believe his majestry SF
@aVague said ^
I don't quite see whats wrong with this moves nc6 and b6, eval bar can change, but that doesn't means it's really that bad , if to outplay position by SF lines
There isn't something so very bad about those moves, it's simply that there are better moves. For example it can be good to not have the knight there on c6 blocking your pawn, that's why castling on move 6 would have been slightly better, putting the king on the side and bringing the rook towards the center.
@aVague said [^](/forum/redirect/post/mM0s4Nsu)
> I don't quite see whats wrong with this moves nc6 and b6, eval bar can change, but that doesn't means it's really that bad , if to outplay position by SF lines
There isn't something so very bad about those moves, it's simply that there are better moves. For example it can be good to not have the knight there on c6 blocking your pawn, that's why castling on move 6 would have been slightly better, putting the king on the side and bringing the rook towards the center.
@Quasar3C273 said ^
I don't quite see whats wrong with this moves nc6 and b6, eval bar can change, but that doesn't means it's really that bad , if to outplay position by SF lines
There isn't something so very bad about those moves, it's simply that there are better moves. For example it can be good to not have the knight there on c6 blocking your pawn, that's why ca...
seems reasonable, but in reality, it can be not quite better I think, if to check it on really high level engines
@Quasar3C273 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/dpcIiQOw)
> > I don't quite see whats wrong with this moves nc6 and b6, eval bar can change, but that doesn't means it's really that bad , if to outplay position by SF lines
>
> There isn't something so very bad about those moves, it's simply that there are better moves. For example it can be good to not have the knight there on c6 blocking your pawn, that's why ca...
seems reasonable, but in reality, it can be not quite better I think, if to check it on really high level engines
@aVague said ^
seems reasonable, but in reality, it can be not quite better I think, if to check it on really high level engines
Well, I don't know, that's just what I think. I'm not a high level engine ;)
@aVague said [^](/forum/redirect/post/ob8nLrLH)
> seems reasonable, but in reality, it can be not quite better I think, if to check it on really high level engines
Well, I don't know, that's just what I think. I'm not a high level engine ;)