https://lichess.org/8V5Z5mdE6iG9
All I had to do was lose 30 games attempting to win blindfolded :skull:
https://lichess.org/8V5Z5mdE6iG9
All I had to do was lose 30 games attempting to win blindfolded :skull:
All I had to do was lose 30 games attempting to win blindfolded :skull:
So you're not using Stockfish?
@IamNOTamod said ^
So you're not using Stockfish?
.... Probably not... On the other hand, he does look guilty of a sandbagging violation...
So you're not using Stockfish?
.... Probably not... On the other hand, he does look guilty of a sandbagging violation...
Sandbagging is such a silly accusation (when it's made to not win rating)
what if someone doesn't want to win the game there are many other objectives not only increasing the F elo. 2000/2100+ rated patzers are the ones complaining poor baby's realizing actually they may suck more than they was aware of
Geee, interesting that the guy banned for violating the terms of service thinks that the suggestion that what someone is doing violates the terms of service is silly.
Yes obviously I don't agree with the rule, but for your information apparently iam banned for using computer assistance not for sandbagging, despite it's under appeal and probably will get out of the computer assistance claim (as it makes 0 sense) but probably will get F by this other silly rule
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.