lichess.org
Donate

First blindfold win (but at what cost)

https://lichess.org/8V5Z5mdE6iG9

All I had to do was lose 30 games attempting to win blindfolded :skull:

https://lichess.org/8V5Z5mdE6iG9 All I had to do was lose 30 games attempting to win blindfolded :skull:

So you're not using Stockfish?

So you're not using Stockfish?

@IamNOTamod said ^

So you're not using Stockfish?

.... Probably not... On the other hand, he does look guilty of a sandbagging violation...

@IamNOTamod said [^](/forum/redirect/post/0royjMQU) > So you're not using Stockfish? .... Probably not... On the other hand, he does look guilty of a sandbagging violation...

@CG314 said ^

So you're not using Stockfish?

.... Probably not... On the other hand, he does look guilty of a sandbagging violation...

Sandbagging is such a silly accusation (when it's made to not win rating)
what if someone doesn't want to win the game there are many other objectives not only increasing the F elo. 2000/2100+ rated patzers are the ones complaining poor baby's realizing actually they may suck more than they was aware of

@CG314 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/8xGFEkh2) > > So you're not using Stockfish? > > .... Probably not... On the other hand, he does look guilty of a sandbagging violation... Sandbagging is such a silly accusation (when it's made to not win rating) what if someone doesn't want to win the game there are many other objectives not only increasing the F elo. 2000/2100+ rated patzers are the ones complaining poor baby's realizing actually they may suck more than they was aware of

Geee, interesting that the guy banned for violating the terms of service thinks that the suggestion that what someone is doing violates the terms of service is silly.

Geee, interesting that the guy banned for violating the terms of service thinks that the suggestion that what someone is doing violates the terms of service is silly.

Yes obviously I don't agree with the rule, but for your information apparently iam banned for using computer assistance not for sandbagging, despite it's under appeal and probably will get out of the computer assistance claim (as it makes 0 sense) but probably will get F by this other silly rule

Yes obviously I don't agree with the rule, but for your information apparently iam banned for using computer assistance not for sandbagging, despite it's under appeal and probably will get out of the computer assistance claim (as it makes 0 sense) but probably will get F by this other silly rule

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.