Funny Turn of Events • page 1/1 • Game Analysis • lichess.org

https://lichess.org/pbUpvdEa/black#42

My opponent decided to blunder his queen, then his rooks, then his pawns.

https://lichess.org/pbUpvdEa/black#42 My opponent decided to blunder his queen, then his rooks, then his pawns.

You were already winning at that point. They probably decided they had enough. Doesn't explain why they threw instead of resigning, though.

TitusPlaysChess123

@IamNOTamod said ^

You were already winning at that point. They probably decided they had enough. Doesn't explain why they threw instead of resigning, though.

Huh, I guess that makes sense.

@IamNOTamod said [^](/forum/redirect/post/6fRM7Wl9) > You were already winning at that point. They probably decided they had enough. Doesn't explain why they threw instead of resigning, though. Huh, I guess that makes sense.

Chesslayer12

@IamNOTamod said ^

You were already winning at that point. They probably decided they had enough. Doesn't explain why they threw instead of resigning, though.

Perhaps he was hoping for a stalemate.

@IamNOTamod said [^](/forum/redirect/post/6fRM7Wl9) > You were already winning at that point. They probably decided they had enough. Doesn't explain why they threw instead of resigning, though. Perhaps he was hoping for a stalemate.