High Accuracy Over 95%

Anyways, still I won.
I am not good in classical

@shivanshbagdia said ^

Anyways, still I won.
I am not good in classical

I see you did use some time to move, well played, but the 95% achieved is mainly achieved by bad play of stockfish 2, with your rating playing classical against level 3 and maybe later level 4 would teach you more, but thinking on moves is good training and will help to improve at classical chess, good luck

@IamNOTamod said ^

Anyone who knows how the pieces move can probably defeat SF level 2.

I checked and have 49 losses against SF 2, 920 wins too but if I play bullet against it a win is not guaranteed. I also have 3 stalemate draws, lol But seriously I consider SF 2 a good speedchess training partner. Level 3 is a bit out of my league... Especially in 1+0, in rapid or classical 3 and 4 will suit me more but in speedchess level 2 is perfect...

Getting a high accuracy is easy when your opponent plays badly. If you are going to brag, then brag about something that is impressive.

But still, stockfish should play sensible.

Plus stockfish accuracy was good: 84%

@shivanshbagdia said ^

Plus stockfish accuracy was good: 84%

Play SF 8

Can you do it first?

I defeated stockfish 6 with good accuracy

@Himawari_Nohara said ^

Stockfish level 8
can this be better?