So played a recent game
- d4 d5 2. c4 Nf6 { D06 Queen's Gambit Declined: Marshall Defense } 3. cxd5 Nxd5 4. e4 Nb6 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. Nc3 e6 7. Be2 Be7 8. O-O O-O 9. h3 Bh5 10. g4 Bg6 11. Ne5 N8d7 12. Nxg6 fxg6 13. f4 Bh4? { (0.74 2.13) Mistake. g5 was best. } (13... g5) 14. g5 c5 15. Bg4 Qe7?! { (2.29 3.10) Inaccuracy. cxd4 was best. } (15... cxd4 16. Bxe6+) 16. d5 exd5 17. Nxd5? { (2.88 1.13) Mistake. exd5 was best. } (17. exd5 h5 18. Be6+ Kh8 19. Kh1 Rae8 20. Qc2 Kh7 21. f5 Kh8 22. Qg2 Ne5) 17... Nxd5?? { (1.13 3.51) Blunder. Qxe4 was best. } (17... Qxe4 18. Bf3 Qd4+ 19. Qxd4 cxd4 20. Bd2 Nxd5 21. Bxd5+ Kh8 22. Rac1 Nb6 23. Bxb7) 18. exd5 Qd6?! { (2.98 3.83) Inaccuracy. h5 was best. } (18... h5 19. Be6+ Kh8 20. Qd3 Kh7 21. f5 Kh8 22. d6 Qd8 23. fxg6 Rxf1+ 24. Qxf1) 19. Be6+ Kh8 20. Qg4 Nb6 21. Rd1? { (3.71 1.89) Mistake. Qxh4 was best. } (21. Qxh4 Nxd5 22. Bxd5 Qxd5 23. Be3 b6 24. Qg3 Rae8 25. Qf3 Qc4 26. Rf2 Rd8) 21... Rfe8?! { (1.89 2.91) Inaccuracy. Rae8 was best. } (21... Rae8) 22. Be3 Nxd5?! { (2.77 3.73) Inaccuracy. Nc4 was best. } (22... Nc4 23. Bc1 Nb6 24. b3 Bg3 25. Bd2 Rxe6 26. Qxe6 Bxf4 27. Qxd6 Bxd6 28. Bc3) 23. Bxd5 Rxe3 24. Bxb7?! { (3.71 2.68) Inaccuracy. Qxh4 was best. } (24. Qxh4 c4 25. Bg2 Rd3 26. Rxd3 cxd3 27. Qf2 Rd8 28. Rd1 d2 29. b3 b5) 24... Rg3+? { (2.68 5.11) Mistake. Qb8 was best. } (24... Qb8 25. Bg2) 25. Kh2?! { (5.11 3.99) Inaccuracy. Qxg3 was best. } (25. Qxg3 Qc7 26. Qxh4 Qxb7 27. Rd2 Rf8 28. Kh2 Qc7 29. Rf2 Re8 30. Qg3 h5) 25... Rxg4?! { (3.99 5.30) Inaccuracy. Qxd1 was best. } (25... Qxd1 26. Qxd1 Re8 27. Bc6 Rb8 28. Qe2 c4 29. Bg2 Rd3 30. Kh1 Rbd8 31. Rc1) 26. Rxd6 Bg3+ 27. Kg2 Bxf4+ 28. hxg4 Bxd6 29. Bxa8 h6 30. Rd1 Bf4 31. Rd8+ Kh7 32. gxh6 gxh6 33. Rd7+ Kg8 34. Rxa7 { Black resigns. } 1-0https://lichess.org/g8uq5rkQ/white#0
Its fairly instructive in how effective putting pressure is, but also that complicating the position doesn't mean only your opponent will suffer- as can be seen in the dips from the game analysis

But, the review shows
So I just wanted to see how the avg centipawn loss comes out to be 27. Only taking the value of the 4 major dips for ease of calculation, has the advantage drops of 2.9->1.1 (-1.8) , 3.7->1.9 (-1.8), 3.7->2.7 (-1) and 5.1->4 (-1.1)
So just these 4 moves have a combined drop of -5.7 or a centipawn loss of 5700. This being a 34 move game, the average should be >5700/34 should it not? But the review only gives 27, way less then the 168 that should be contributed from just these 4 moves.
What am I missing?
So played a recent game
1. d4 d5 2. c4 Nf6 { D06 Queen's Gambit Declined: Marshall Defense } 3. cxd5 Nxd5 4. e4 Nb6 5. Nf3 Bg4 6. Nc3 e6 7. Be2 Be7 8. O-O O-O 9. h3 Bh5 10. g4 Bg6 11. Ne5 N8d7 12. Nxg6 fxg6 13. f4 Bh4? { (0.74 2.13) Mistake. g5 was best. } (13... g5) 14. g5 c5 15. Bg4 Qe7?! { (2.29 3.10) Inaccuracy. cxd4 was best. } (15... cxd4 16. Bxe6+) 16. d5 exd5 17. Nxd5? { (2.88 1.13) Mistake. exd5 was best. } (17. exd5 h5 18. Be6+ Kh8 19. Kh1 Rae8 20. Qc2 Kh7 21. f5 Kh8 22. Qg2 Ne5) 17... Nxd5?? { (1.13 3.51) Blunder. Qxe4 was best. } (17... Qxe4 18. Bf3 Qd4+ 19. Qxd4 cxd4 20. Bd2 Nxd5 21. Bxd5+ Kh8 22. Rac1 Nb6 23. Bxb7) 18. exd5 Qd6?! { (2.98 3.83) Inaccuracy. h5 was best. } (18... h5 19. Be6+ Kh8 20. Qd3 Kh7 21. f5 Kh8 22. d6 Qd8 23. fxg6 Rxf1+ 24. Qxf1) 19. Be6+ Kh8 20. Qg4 Nb6 21. Rd1? { (3.71 1.89) Mistake. Qxh4 was best. } (21. Qxh4 Nxd5 22. Bxd5 Qxd5 23. Be3 b6 24. Qg3 Rae8 25. Qf3 Qc4 26. Rf2 Rd8) 21... Rfe8?! { (1.89 2.91) Inaccuracy. Rae8 was best. } (21... Rae8) 22. Be3 Nxd5?! { (2.77 3.73) Inaccuracy. Nc4 was best. } (22... Nc4 23. Bc1 Nb6 24. b3 Bg3 25. Bd2 Rxe6 26. Qxe6 Bxf4 27. Qxd6 Bxd6 28. Bc3) 23. Bxd5 Rxe3 24. Bxb7?! { (3.71 2.68) Inaccuracy. Qxh4 was best. } (24. Qxh4 c4 25. Bg2 Rd3 26. Rxd3 cxd3 27. Qf2 Rd8 28. Rd1 d2 29. b3 b5) 24... Rg3+? { (2.68 5.11) Mistake. Qb8 was best. } (24... Qb8 25. Bg2) 25. Kh2?! { (5.11 3.99) Inaccuracy. Qxg3 was best. } (25. Qxg3 Qc7 26. Qxh4 Qxb7 27. Rd2 Rf8 28. Kh2 Qc7 29. Rf2 Re8 30. Qg3 h5) 25... Rxg4?! { (3.99 5.30) Inaccuracy. Qxd1 was best. } (25... Qxd1 26. Qxd1 Re8 27. Bc6 Rb8 28. Qe2 c4 29. Bg2 Rd3 30. Kh1 Rbd8 31. Rc1) 26. Rxd6 Bg3+ 27. Kg2 Bxf4+ 28. hxg4 Bxd6 29. Bxa8 h6 30. Rd1 Bf4 31. Rd8+ Kh7 32. gxh6 gxh6 33. Rd7+ Kg8 34. Rxa7 { Black resigns. } 1-0
https://lichess.org/g8uq5rkQ/white#0
Its fairly instructive in how effective putting pressure is, but also that complicating the position doesn't mean only your opponent will suffer- as can be seen in the dips from the game analysis

But, the review shows

So I just wanted to see how the avg centipawn loss comes out to be 27. Only taking the value of the 4 major dips for ease of calculation, has the advantage drops of 2.9->1.1 (-1.8) , 3.7->1.9 (-1.8), 3.7->2.7 (-1) and 5.1->4 (-1.1)
So just these 4 moves have a combined drop of -5.7 or a centipawn loss of 5700. This being a 34 move game, the average should be >5700/34 should it not? But the review only gives 27, way less then the 168 that should be contributed from just these 4 moves.
What am I missing?
