lichess.org
Donate

How to see sac continuation?

@IamNOTamod said ^

Really? You don’t know? Shadow and I have warned you both enough times, no?

sa,e old stroy, instead of answering question needed, you start threating me and give useless info, thx, I hope you won't comment' on my theads, because you don't bring any use there

@IamNOTamod said [^](/forum/redirect/post/GCFkZsIi) > Really? You don’t know? Shadow and I have warned you both enough times, no? sa,e old stroy, instead of answering question needed, you start threating me and give useless info, thx, I hope you won't comment' on my theads, because you don't bring any use there

“instead of answering question needed”

Why should I, when you will disregard the answer anyways, as you have done thrice in the past?

“you start threating me”

What a fantastical accusation! I am not threatening you, merely stating a fact which you continue to wilfully ignore, at your own peril.

“instead of answering question needed” Why should I, when you will disregard the answer anyways, as you have done thrice in the past? “you start threating me” What a fantastical accusation! I am not threatening you, merely stating a fact which you continue to wilfully ignore, at your own peril.

@IamNOTamod said ^

“instead of answering question needed”

1 igniore the answer? really? If I know truth about Brutal baby case, u really thing I would ignore it?
2 u re not theating Me? really? all u do is to put My attention into chat rules with no real reason? All I do is to analyse game, what this section is really meant to be, and all u do is to point Me into rules, instead of game advice

@IamNOTamod said [^](/forum/redirect/post/5Jmk1jP5) > “instead of answering question needed” 1 igniore the answer? really? If I know truth about Brutal baby case, u really thing I would ignore it? 2 u re not theating Me? really? all u do is to put My attention into chat rules with no real reason? All I do is to analyse game, what this section is really meant to be, and all u do is to point Me into rules, instead of game advice
<Comment deleted by user>

@Himawari_Nohara said ^

there is a king pawn march and pressing that causes king to retreat and get figure back with pawn pressing, but it's not easy to play, how I supposed to see it?

The best way to find these sacrifices is to do them when your intuition says. Slowly you will be able to make the right ones too. (Obviously, dont blunder your queen for the sake of sacrificing)

but here is not simple sac, here I need to see right strategical plan with pawn marching and pressing, otherwise, sac can be useless somehow

@Himawari_Nohara said [^](/forum/redirect/post/GBKgg727) > > there is a king pawn march and pressing that causes king to retreat and get figure back with pawn pressing, but it's not easy to play, how I supposed to see it? > > > The best way to find these sacrifices is to do them when your intuition says. Slowly you will be able to make the right ones too. (Obviously, dont blunder your queen for the sake of sacrificing) but here is not simple sac, here I need to see right strategical plan with pawn marching and pressing, otherwise, sac can be useless somehow
<Comment deleted by user>

@Himawari_Nohara said ^

there is a king pawn march and pressing that causes king to retreat and get figure back with pawn pressing, but it's not easy to play, how I supposed to see it?

The best way to find these sacrifices is to do them when your intuition says. Slowly you will be able to make the right ones too. (Obviously, dont blunder your queen for the sake of sacrificing)

but here is not simple sac, here I need to see right strategical plan with pawn marching and pressing, otherwise, sac can be useless somehow

Yes, in your game the sacrifice did not bring immediate win. It would also be hard for me to risk it. However upon closer analysis using engine, I was fascianted to see how black just cannot get rid of the pin, and white slowly launches a pawn assault on the kingside. It was definitely hard to believe.

Yes True Beauty of Chess logic

@Himawari_Nohara said [^](/forum/redirect/post/7YSpcoDF) > > > > there is a king pawn march and pressing that causes king to retreat and get figure back with pawn pressing, but it's not easy to play, how I supposed to see it? > > > > > > > > > The best way to find these sacrifices is to do them when your intuition says. Slowly you will be able to make the right ones too. (Obviously, dont blunder your queen for the sake of sacrificing) > > > > but here is not simple sac, here I need to see right strategical plan with pawn marching and pressing, otherwise, sac can be useless somehow > > Yes, in your game the sacrifice did not bring immediate win. It would also be hard for me to risk it. However upon closer analysis using engine, I was fascianted to see how black just cannot get rid of the pin, and white slowly launches a pawn assault on the kingside. It was definitely hard to believe. Yes True Beauty of Chess logic

@shadow1414 said ^

[...] I suppose that we should prepare for a repeat of the past: Five--seven vague threads a week. (Or more?) Perhaps you would share all of your, 'beauty games' in just this one thread instead of making threads for each of them? [...]

It's already started... sigh

@shadow1414 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/puIs4tED) > [...] I suppose that we should prepare for a repeat of the past: Five--seven vague threads a week. (Or more?) Perhaps you would share all of your, 'beauty games' in just this one thread instead of making threads for each of them? [...] It's already started... *sigh*

"All I do is to analyse game"

Many times, you showcase your winning games without asking for analysis. This has happened less recently, good for you! However, when you ask for advice, and people give it, you ignore it, saying it doesn't work, without trying. Other times, you put many games into one thread without making much comments or asking questions about the game.

Oh, and posting about games you lost would be more useful for analysis compared to games you won. Mistakes are to be learnt from, and you have many!

:)

Please don't take offense at our posts, we are just trying to help!

"All I do is to analyse game" Many times, you showcase your winning games without asking for analysis. This has happened less recently, good for you! However, when you ask for advice, and people give it, you ignore it, saying it doesn't work, without trying. Other times, you put many games into one thread without making much comments or asking questions about the game. Oh, and posting about games you lost would be more useful for analysis compared to games you won. Mistakes are to be learnt from, and you have many! :) Please don't take offense at our posts, we are just trying to help!

@IamNOTamod said ^

"All I do is to analyse game"

Many times, you showcase your winning games without asking for analysis. This has happened less recently, good for you! However, when you ask for advice, and people give it, you ignore it, saying it doesn't work, without trying. Other times, you put many games into one thread without making much comments or asking questions about the game.

Oh, and posting about games you lost would be more useful for analysis compared to games you won. Mistakes are to be learnt from, and you have many!

:)

Please don't take offense at our posts, we are just trying to help!

all I can say it's not truth really at all

@IamNOTamod said [^](/forum/redirect/post/gaDDeXgb) > "All I do is to analyse game" > > Many times, you showcase your winning games without asking for analysis. This has happened less recently, good for you! However, when you ask for advice, and people give it, you ignore it, saying it doesn't work, without trying. Other times, you put many games into one thread without making much comments or asking questions about the game. > > Oh, and posting about games you lost would be more useful for analysis compared to games you won. Mistakes are to be learnt from, and you have many! > > :) > > Please don't take offense at our posts, we are just trying to help! all I can say it's not truth really at all

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.