I play 60-70%: should i stop play chess? • page 2/2 • Game Analysis • lichess.org

Sometimes we just don't like games, even tho we know it is in fact a great game, we just cannot enjoy it.

But like, i used to play Elsword and i was a complete failure, i couldn't win 10% of my 1v1s. But i knew it was a great game and i did enjoy playing it a lot.

So my point is if you really enjoy playing some chess, take your time to improve and get those stats up.

Sometimes we just don't like games, even tho we know it is in fact a great game, we just cannot enjoy it. But like, i used to play Elsword and i was a complete failure, i couldn't win 10% of my 1v1s. But i knew it was a great game and i did enjoy playing it a lot. So my point is if you really enjoy playing some chess, take your time to improve and get those stats up.

James_J_Henderson

I hate losing, but I view my online games as preparation for playing someone face-to-face. I've had losses where I was cursing myself after the game, but after running it through Stockfish discovered some really interesting tactic, endgame technique, etc.

puzzlesolver5269 edited

Hi, I am a 2k rapid player on chess.com. I am also a polyglot knowing japanese and Chinese and English and Turkish and Arabic and my native language is Persian. When I was a kid, I really wanted to be very at chess and languages but I ended up in the accounting university. I want to say that you just do things daily and they will improve. My current rating on chess. Com is 1927. But my peak was 1989. You just need to keep going and have fun. That's all that matters. Getting better at everything means not give up. خداحافظ، goodbye, さよなら

slimeychesspoo

Accuracy of games depends on
1).Complexity of positions
2).Your understanding of positions
3).The time control of games.
4) certain psychological factors like for instance if your opponent had the upper hand the whole game you play under pressure and make less accurate moves.

"stopping" to play chess over some blitz games that are nominally "low" accuracy imo is silly.
instead look for understand why a given game had low accuracy for instance you missed a tactic , or key positional idea etc.

Accuracy of games depends on 1).Complexity of positions 2).Your understanding of positions 3).The time control of games. 4) certain psychological factors like for instance if your opponent had the upper hand the whole game you play under pressure and make less accurate moves. "stopping" to play chess over some blitz games that are nominally "low" accuracy imo is silly. instead look for understand *why* a given game had low accuracy for instance you missed a tactic , or key positional idea etc.

ak_saha edited

Even 2200 players play bad at 3+0 (50% accuracy)

https://lichess.org/fEl5W6zmi8PO

Obviously blitz is not real chess so you should use it to try out wild things

Even 2200 players play bad at 3+0 (50% accuracy) https://lichess.org/fEl5W6zmi8PO Obviously blitz is not real chess so you should use it to try out wild things

justme23

edited

A lot of talk.
No one will play a 30 minute 5 sec delay is because they might lose rating points.
You should stop worrying about points and learn more chess

A lot of talk. No one will play a 30 minute 5 sec delay is because they might lose rating points. You should stop worrying about points and learn more chess

puzzlesolver5269 edited

https://lichess.org/tIpa420M/black

It shows that even 10 minute is not enough to play chess well. I am actually a 2000 rapid player on chess. Com. So I hope you understand that even strong chess players can have a bad day. Enjoy chess and do not worry.

https://lichess.org/tIpa420M/black It shows that even 10 minute is not enough to play chess well. I am actually a 2000 rapid player on chess. Com. So I hope you understand that even strong chess players can have a bad day. Enjoy chess and do not worry.

slimeychesspoo

Have a look this game: I play white pieces..

https://lichess.org/jA8YJlqU

Supposedly 97% accuracy.
The reason being is that the opponent made things ridiculously simple for me
The plan was to just pressure the backwards f pawn and win it which he received after a queen exchange.
Then he made things even easier pushing with 21)c4 and now that I am 2 pawns up the plan is crystal clear: to promote a pawn.
All moves came naturally because opponent didn't put in resilience.
If you make moves that allow your opponent to easily find a refutation to them that leads them to high accuracy games.

Have a look this game: I play white pieces.. https://lichess.org/jA8YJlqU Supposedly 97% accuracy. The reason being is that the opponent made things ridiculously simple for me The plan was to just pressure the backwards f pawn and win it which he received after a queen exchange. Then he made things even easier pushing with 21)c4 and now that I am 2 pawns up the plan is crystal clear: to promote a pawn. All moves came naturally because opponent didn't put in resilience. If you make moves that allow your opponent to easily find a refutation to them that leads them to high accuracy games.