level 4 is not really a candidate for bonus points tbh
https://lichess.org/VqycEpgF9HSY
level 4 is not really a candidate for bonus points tbh
https://lichess.org/VqycEpgF9HSY
level 4 is not really a candidate for bonus points tbh
"Fight, fight!"
@Himawari_Nohara said ^
Try beating stockfish 7 if you are strong
I just checked my results against level 7, 2 wins 5 draws and 65 losses, I consider 6 as a training partner and 7 as out of my league and I agree with you, bragging about wins against level 4 is allright if you are 1200 but if you are rated higher level 4 is way to easy
I played more than humans against bots. I know how hard it is to make a comeback against them. I also played against normal bots my favorite opponents are 2000 computer on chess.com. don't pretend that you can make comeback from being down a queen against or a huge deficient against them( level 4 or my chess.com account 1600 chess bot). It's hard because before you know it, it will overwhelm you.Also even when I lose to 2300 chess bot, I will force it to play at least 60 or 70 moves against me. I am also at a level on chess.com that I claim I am better than 98 percent of people who have read my words. And also my message was not to say this fact I wanted to just mention this checkmate (two bishop checkmate) because I found it beautiful and the art of making comeback because it's practical. The fact that I can beat 1600 rapid player on chess.com 5 out 6 is not an illusion.
You are talking me like I am some kind of fraud. It's easy to see it but it's hard when you will try it yourself. This is my answer to everyone who have read my words. I got tired of this. Unsubscribed.
@puzzlesolver5269 has shown a habit of running away from the truth. Just earlier, they wrote in my inbox that they would play me in any time control to prove their words, then shortly after, disabled challenges and messages. Interesting.
I am unsubscribing too, having finally realised that posting in the threads of stubbornly unreasonable OPs is a waste of time.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.