lichess.org
Donate

Just cooked up an IM!

https://lichess.org/Iy9oTHLe3GAL

The simul had 23 players and he started with 50 min

https://lichess.org/Iy9oTHLe3GAL The simul had 23 players and he started with 50 min

@farooqabdullah said ^

https://lichess.org/Iy9oTHLe3GAL

Красавчик!

@farooqabdullah said [^](/forum/redirect/post/r22tAgk7) > https://lichess.org/Iy9oTHLe3GAL Красавчик!

It is really quite disrespectful to the experts who generously offer their time to offer you the opportunity to play them in simuls to then show the game (with their name), and NOT specify that it is a simul.

A lot of things happen in simuls, that are normal in simuls, but that would be very embarrassing to the same player if they happened to him in a "real" game. There is certainly nothing wrong with showing such games, but simple manners requires that the fact that it is a simul be specified.

It is really quite disrespectful to the experts who generously offer their time to offer you the opportunity to play them in simuls to then show the game (with their name), and NOT specify that it is a simul. A lot of things happen in simuls, that are normal in simuls, but that would be very embarrassing to the same player if they happened to him in a "real" game. There is certainly nothing wrong with showing such games, but simple manners requires that the fact that it is a simul be specified.

@CG314 said ^

It is really quite disrespectful to the experts who generously offer their time to offer you the opportunity to play them in simuls to then show the game (with their name), and NOT specify that it is a simul.

A lot of things happen in simuls, that are normal in simuls, but that would be very embarrassing to the same player if they happened to him in a "real" game. There is certainly nothing wrong with showing such games, but simple manners requires that the fact that it is a simul be specified.

Oh my... I forgot to add that it was a simul

@CG314 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/seFTnntL) > It is really quite disrespectful to the experts who generously offer their time to offer you the opportunity to play them in simuls to then show the game (with their name), and NOT specify that it is a simul. > > A lot of things happen in simuls, that are normal in simuls, but that would be very embarrassing to the same player if they happened to him in a "real" game. There is certainly nothing wrong with showing such games, but simple manners requires that the fact that it is a simul be specified. Oh my... I forgot to add that it was a simul

It was a rook hang...not a "cook up." You got quite lucky there.

It was a rook hang...not a "cook up." You got quite lucky there.

@MrPushwood said ^

It was a rook hang...not a "cook up." You got quite lucky there.

Yup.

I got lucky recently (about 2 days ago) when my opponent blundered mate while being up a rook & two pawns and having a +6.0 engine preference.

I wouldn't call that a cook up either, just a very lucky outcome and a lucky move choice.

@MrPushwood said [^](/forum/redirect/post/aNgETuXA) > It was a rook hang...not a "cook up." You got quite lucky there. Yup. I got lucky recently (about 2 days ago) when my opponent blundered mate while being up a rook & two pawns and having a +6.0 engine preference. I wouldn't call that a cook up either, just a very lucky outcome and a lucky move choice.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.