Looking for game reviewers

I am participating on a school chess tournament in 18th May. I have a training plan and do it almost daily, and in it there is detailed analysis and a study for every game I played (only once a day)
In the later days, I have gotten confused with the computer's analysis, both here and WintrChess, but the built-in one here is particularly more strict and also more baffling.
https://lichess.org/study/cUb5BlKa/XLglVbUd
If anybody is interested in my games and journey, please leave a DM as I do am looking for people who can give me tips.

It is better to post a game you lost, and a longer time control than 10+0, e.g. 15+10.
What is the time control of your tournament?

@tpr said ^

It is better to post a game you lost, and a longer time control than 10+0, e.g. 15+10.
What is the time control of your tournament?

It is 10+0.

https[colon]//lichess[period]org/vBAHPtNr
@WantedAName said in #1:

... [[Black "WantedAName"] ... 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bc4 Bc5 4 d3 Nf6 5 Nc3 d6 6 a4 Nd4 7 b3 O-O 8 Bb2 Re8 9 O-O Bg4 10 Nd5 c6 11 Nxf6+ Qxf6 12 Bxd4 Bxd4 ... Machine comment: 10...c6 was a mistake. Nxd5 was best.]
... Well, I did not understand the value of exchanging the knights here. ...

After 10 Nd5, you had a somewhat valuable opportunity to go for 10...Nxd5 11 Bxd5 Nxf3+ 12 gxf3 Bh5, exposing ThomasAugustinJavier's king. By playing 10...c6, you gave ThomasAugustinJavier the opportunity to go for 10...c6 11 Nxf6+ Qxf6 12 Bxd4, eliminating the danger of ...Nxf3+.