My latest game at the moment with 100% accurate

My accuracy in this game was 100%! I understand that this is only partly a result of my strong play in this game, and partly a result of my opponent's erroneous play at the very beginning of the game, after which I had to carefully convert an already winning position. But I executed this conversion very, very well, and my accuracy in this game was 100%! My opponent made more mistakes later, and it might seem that he played really badly after that. But in the analysis of the game, you can see that his accuracy was 85% (I understand that this is his accuracy value because, starting with his mistake at the beginning of the game, his position was lost, and therefore his subsequent moves changed the situation relatively little). In other words, he didn't play catastrophically badly, but relatively sensibly. The computer evaluates his play in this game: with only one blunder and one mistake throughout the entire game. The game, while not long, was not short either: 27 moves in total. So, this game isn't at all like where my opponent made a mistake at the very beginning and almost immediately resigned, and that's why the accuracy was so great. No, there were 27 moves in the game. A relatively rare event occurred in this game: 100% accuracy. For example, at the time of writing this, I have played 21,201 games on Lichess. Of those, about 3.5% of my games (I used to keep statistics of my games; I found that I was getting about this proportion of games with a relatively consistent accuracy of 97%-99%, then I stopped keeping such statistics and continued to play roughly as I did when I started keeping these statistics) were played with my accuracy of 97%-99%. That's several hundred games. And with my 100% accuracy, this is, as far as I remember, only my fifth game! 100% accuracy is a great rarity, both for me and in general! So, I'm sharing with everyone an example of a game with 100% accuracy! I assume there are quite a few chess players who are interested in seeing a game with 100% accuracy! A sight worth seeing! An example of a very high-quality execution of a winning position. Here, I'll share... My game:

Thank goodness it wasn't one of those 10 move games where the opponents hang their queen....

But asides from that, it was a correspondence game (it would be much, much, much more impressive if it was a rapid or blitz game) so I wouldn't say that's it's a phenomenal performance that only a few players get...

But congrats! Well played by you and nice conversion from a better position to a winning one.

@Chesslayer12 said ^

Thank goodness it wasn't one of those 10 move games where the opponents hang their queen....

But asides from that, it was a correspondence game (it would be much, much, much more impressive if it was a rapid or blitz game) so I wouldn't say that's it's a phenomenal performance that only a few players get...

But congrats! Well played by you and nice conversion from a better position to a winning ...

The other four, as far as I remember, my 100% accuracy victories weren't in correspondence chess. They were definitely in bullet and rapid, but I don't remember any blitz. One of them (the rapid one) involved a fantastic attack on my part. In that game, my opponent didn't miss material, he missed a fantastic attack. And the other three, as far as I remember, involved my opponent missing material, and then quickly capitulating. Those three games roughly fit your description. Thanks for the congratulations!

@Chesslayer12 said ^

Thank goodness it wasn't one of those 10 move games where the opponents hang their queen....

But asides from that, it was a correspondence game (it would be much, much, much more impressive if it was a rapid or blitz game) so I wouldn't say that's it's a phenomenal performance that only a few players get...

But congrats! Well played by you and nice conversion from a better position to a winning ...

But I don't understand your skepticism about correspondence games. At my level of play (currently 2452, and my highest rating was 2532), it's much harder to win them than in non-correspondence chess. The quality of the games is much higher than in classical chess, let alone in any of the faster chess formats. And at rating levels 100-200 points higher than mine, people play with statistics that are astonishing to me. About 50% of players there have over 50% of their games with a result of 0 blunders, 0 errors, 0 inaccuracies (and with an accuracy of 97%-100%). They play as if they were chess demigods.

@Chesslayer12 said ^

Thank goodness it wasn't one of those 10 move games where the opponents hang their queen....

Instead it was (or should've been) one of those 10 move games where the opponent hangs a piece.

Seriously, "accuracy" means absolutely nothing in such cases. And I do wish they would adjust the engine's pronouncements to reflect the reality of such situations.

I wonder what element in this game made you eligible to brag your 100%

@TheMagnusAura said ^

I wonder what element in this game made you eligible to brag your 100%

You open the game statistics and see 100% overall accuracy. As usual. It's amazing that this needs explaining.

In my opinion (I could be wrong, this is my personal opinion; but there's a huge chance I'm right), anyone who has disliked a game with 100% accuracy (I've had similar experiences before) has simply admitted to being envious. I don't see a single worthy reason to dislike a game with 100% accuracy. Even if you didn't like the game, I consider a worthy response to be, for example, saying "the game wasn't impressive" and not reacting at all. How could anyone even dare dislike a game with 100% accuracy? I'm amazed at the worldview some people have, and why they do that. In the vast majority of cases, the reason is envy. I certainly wouldn't dislike anyone with 100% accuracy (even if it were a game with a queen blunder at the very beginning and immediate capitulation). I'm not envious. )))))

)@(Inventor_1

No offense but..

This guy made a quick 100% accuracy ever I seen before (LOL)

(I'm just bragging for my team mate)

I am only a bit above 1100, so any of the two players would defeat me