lichess.org
Donate

My latest game at the moment with 100% accurate

@SANJAY-KURAMA2003

Well, that's great! I'm happy for him! Why are you writing this to me? Unlike those who disliked the party with 100% accuracy, I'm not envious at all! On the contrary, I'm happy for people in situations like this! Does my reaction surprise you? Were you mistakenly trying to guess my reaction from yourself? My reaction to this is colossally different from yours. Your hand made it possible to dislike the party with 100% accuracy. My hand would never have done that. I'm not envious. I have many, many, many successes of my own in life. Unlike almost all envious people. ))))) And the game with 100% accuracy on Lichess in the two years of my presence here is at least my fifth already. And games with 97%-99% accuracy in the two years of my playing on Lichess, or about 500 or even more. And this is a tiny, tiny, tiny part of my achievements in life. In general, it’s almost unnoticeable compared to my other achievements.

@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 Well, that's great! I'm happy for him! Why are you writing this to me? Unlike those who disliked the party with 100% accuracy, I'm not envious at all! On the contrary, I'm happy for people in situations like this! Does my reaction surprise you? Were you mistakenly trying to guess my reaction from yourself? My reaction to this is colossally different from yours. Your hand made it possible to dislike the party with 100% accuracy. My hand would never have done that. I'm not envious. I have many, many, many successes of my own in life. Unlike almost all envious people. ))))) And the game with 100% accuracy on Lichess in the two years of my presence here is at least my fifth already. And games with 97%-99% accuracy in the two years of my playing on Lichess, or about 500 or even more. And this is a tiny, tiny, tiny part of my achievements in life. In general, it’s almost unnoticeable compared to my other achievements.

@Inventor_1
I know you're (Happy) about 100% accuracy? Yeah me too
Bcuz I never ever get 100% accuracy I only got 99% accuracy

But the problem is game analysis (sub-forum) not for bragging

Maybe you can do a blog that's concerned

@Inventor_1 I know you're (Happy) about 100% accuracy? Yeah me too Bcuz I never ever get 100% accuracy I only got 99% accuracy --- But the problem is game analysis (sub-forum) not for **bragging** --- Maybe you can do a blog that's concerned

@Inventor_1 said ^

I'm amazed at the worldview some people have, and why they do that. In the vast majority of cases, the reason is envy. I certainly wouldn't dislike anyone with 100% accuracy (even if it were a game with a queen blunder at the very beginning and immediate capitulation). I'm not envious. )))))

You cannot stop people from disliking what they want, but sure try not to get affected from it. The world does not agree with anybody and we have to accept that.

@Inventor_1 said ^

I'm not envious. I have many, many, many successes of my own in life. Unlike almost all envious people. )))))

Quite a daring thing to say, given that you don't even know our real name.

@Inventor_1 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/NjH2IUlg) > I'm amazed at the worldview some people have, and why they do that. In the vast majority of cases, the reason is envy. I certainly wouldn't dislike anyone with 100% accuracy (even if it were a game with a queen blunder at the very beginning and immediate capitulation). I'm not envious. ))))) You cannot stop people from disliking what they want, but sure try not to get affected from it. The world does not agree with anybody and we have to accept that. @Inventor_1 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/xXJIy7lB) > I'm not envious. I have many, many, many successes of my own in life. Unlike almost all envious people. ))))) Quite a daring thing to say, given that you don't even know our real name.

@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 said ^

@Inventor_1
I know you're (Happy) about 100% accuracy? Yeah me too
Bcuz I never ever get 100% accuracy I only got 99% accuracy

But the problem is game analysis (sub-forum) not for bragging

Maybe you can do a blog that's concerned

Why? Actually, almost this entire subforum consists of threads like "I played such-and-such a game" (and usually the game posted is clearly worse than the many thousands of my games). There are many, many threads similar to mine, but with much, much more common accuracy rates. For example, 97%-99% (I have roughly 500 or more such games on Lichess). For every game with 100% accuracy, I have at least 60 games with 97% accuracy. And the vast majority of chess players have never played games with 100% accuracy. If we're going to post on this subforum in this format (and almost the entire subforum consists of posting games in this format), then it's logical to first and foremost use the highest possible accuracy. I completely understand the joy of people who have played a game with 97% accuracy for the first time and are posting it here. I've had hundreds of such games and even more accurate ones over two years; this is their first. But a game with 100% accuracy is even more deserving of being posted here (than games with 97% accuracy, of which I have over 60 times more, plus many more that are even more accurate, and for the vast majority of players, the ratio is infinitely greater). And my game has an analysis. Click on it and see the results of Stockfish's analysis. It's almost infinitely superior to the "so-called analysis" of the vast majority of chess players sharing their thoughts on their games.

@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/kh7Em7vq) > @Inventor_1 > I know you're (Happy) about 100% accuracy? Yeah me too > Bcuz I never ever get 100% accuracy I only got 99% accuracy > --- > But the problem is game analysis (sub-forum) not for **bragging** > --- > Maybe you can do a blog that's concerned Why? Actually, almost this entire subforum consists of threads like "I played such-and-such a game" (and usually the game posted is clearly worse than the many thousands of my games). There are many, many threads similar to mine, but with much, much more common accuracy rates. For example, 97%-99% (I have roughly 500 or more such games on Lichess). For every game with 100% accuracy, I have at least 60 games with 97% accuracy. And the vast majority of chess players have never played games with 100% accuracy. If we're going to post on this subforum in this format (and almost the entire subforum consists of posting games in this format), then it's logical to first and foremost use the highest possible accuracy. I completely understand the joy of people who have played a game with 97% accuracy for the first time and are posting it here. I've had hundreds of such games and even more accurate ones over two years; this is their first. But a game with 100% accuracy is even more deserving of being posted here (than games with 97% accuracy, of which I have over 60 times more, plus many more that are even more accurate, and for the vast majority of players, the ratio is infinitely greater). And my game has an analysis. Click on it and see the results of Stockfish's analysis. It's almost infinitely superior to the "so-called analysis" of the vast majority of chess players sharing their thoughts on their games.

@Inventor_1
How to use (game--analysis) wisely


  • Asking help for position clearance and understanding

  • Showing a new 1. openings 2. Strategies

But definitely I'm not aware for accuracy bragging
But yeah I did it for a couples of months ago now I (realized) that's not for a good chess player behaviors


But I leave to this a (@A Lichess Moderaor) I believe he give answers for this case

@Inventor_1 How to use (game--analysis) wisely ___ * Asking help for position clearance and understanding ___ * Showing a new 1. openings 2. Strategies --- But definitely I'm not aware for accuracy bragging But yeah I did it for a couples of months ago now I (realized) that's not for a good chess player behaviors ___ But I leave to this a (@A Lichess Moderaor) I believe he give answers for this **case**

@TheMagnusAura said ^

I'm amazed at the worldview some people have, and why they do that. In the vast majority of cases, the reason is envy. I certainly wouldn't dislike anyone with 100% accuracy (even if it were a game with a queen blunder at the very beginning and immediate capitulation). I'm not envious. )))))

You cannot stop people from disliking what they want...

My wording is perfectly correct. Not that you somehow lifted it from my text, but the text as a whole. If you just lift it, you won't understand anything correctly. The entire text is important. In my wording, I even allowed for the possibility that I could be wrong about some things. My wording is such that I cannot be wrong under any circumstances. If you had read it carefully, you wouldn't have had to write what you just wrote. I'm very good at understanding people and their reactions. And I know that the root cause of the reactions I observe here is, in the vast majority of cases, envy. Plus a personal inferiority complex, dissatisfaction with one's actual results. And much of the same. People who don't have these problems have completely different reactions in such cases. And these aren't just my observations. I even borrowed it from some super-professional, super-smart people. I learned this from them, and I'm convinced that it's colossally correct. The vast majority of people on the planet are unsuccessful and suffer from a multitude of complexes (inferiority complexes and the like). And the vast majority of these people react very painfully to the success of others. They react negatively. Their subconscious torments them, "How is this possible? Others are successful, and I'm so unsuccessful in everything, or almost everything?" These people love to gather in flocks and try to prevent other people from soaring higher and higher in their endeavors, or at least verbally criticize them. This is not an anomaly; it's human nature; most people are like this. On the contrary, the exception are people who have managed to overcome this in themselves, to throw it out of themselves (or who initially grew up without it). The more success you have, the greater the chance of not being like this. I have had many, many, many successes in my life. I overcame this in myself a long time ago (I never had it in a significant amount, only a little and a very long time ago). But the vast majority of people live with this their whole lives. They suffer themselves and, if possible, prevent others from climbing the ladder of success (or at least verbally express their dissatisfaction, for example: “this one is bragging”, “how dare he stand out from the crowd of us?”, “how can we somehow harm him?”).

@TheMagnusAura said [^](/forum/redirect/post/TGbF3FY4) > > I'm amazed at the worldview some people have, and why they do that. In the vast majority of cases, the reason is envy. I certainly wouldn't dislike anyone with 100% accuracy (even if it were a game with a queen blunder at the very beginning and immediate capitulation). I'm not envious. ))))) > > You cannot stop people from disliking what they want... My wording is perfectly correct. Not that you somehow lifted it from my text, but the text as a whole. If you just lift it, you won't understand anything correctly. The entire text is important. In my wording, I even allowed for the possibility that I could be wrong about some things. My wording is such that I cannot be wrong under any circumstances. If you had read it carefully, you wouldn't have had to write what you just wrote. I'm very good at understanding people and their reactions. And I know that the root cause of the reactions I observe here is, in the vast majority of cases, envy. Plus a personal inferiority complex, dissatisfaction with one's actual results. And much of the same. People who don't have these problems have completely different reactions in such cases. And these aren't just my observations. I even borrowed it from some super-professional, super-smart people. I learned this from them, and I'm convinced that it's colossally correct. The vast majority of people on the planet are unsuccessful and suffer from a multitude of complexes (inferiority complexes and the like). And the vast majority of these people react very painfully to the success of others. They react negatively. Their subconscious torments them, "How is this possible? Others are successful, and I'm so unsuccessful in everything, or almost everything?" These people love to gather in flocks and try to prevent other people from soaring higher and higher in their endeavors, or at least verbally criticize them. This is not an anomaly; it's human nature; most people are like this. On the contrary, the exception are people who have managed to overcome this in themselves, to throw it out of themselves (or who initially grew up without it). The more success you have, the greater the chance of not being like this. I have had many, many, many successes in my life. I overcame this in myself a long time ago (I never had it in a significant amount, only a little and a very long time ago). But the vast majority of people live with this their whole lives. They suffer themselves and, if possible, prevent others from climbing the ladder of success (or at least verbally express their dissatisfaction, for example: “this one is bragging”, “how dare he stand out from the crowd of us?”, “how can we somehow harm him?”).

For as far as i can see, this guy is only bragging about himself, leave some room for the others, will you?

For as far as i can see, this guy is only bragging about himself, leave some room for the others, will you?

@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 said ^

@Inventor_1
How to use (game--analysis) wisely


  • Asking help for position clearance and understanding

  • Showing a new 1. openings 2. Strategies

But definitely I'm not aware for accuracy bragging
But yeah I did it for a couples of months ago now I (realized) that's not for a good chess player behaviors


But I leave to this a (@A Lichess Moderaor) I believe he give answers for t...

Your entire new comment hasn't refuted anything I've said before. There are simply 0% of arguments against my arguments. In fact, everything I've said before still stands. And you've already filled this entire subforum with topics far less appropriate for this forum than mine. And this is the first time I've created a topic in this subforum. And in any case, almost this entire subforum is made up of topics similar to mine, but with a much, much, much less valuable and rare event. My topic stands out colossally, and in a positive way, from all your topics in this subforum, and from almost all the others.

@SANJAY-KURAMA2003 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/7gQGvb7O) > @Inventor_1 > How to use (game--analysis) wisely > ___ > * Asking help for position clearance and understanding > ___ > * Showing a new 1. openings 2. Strategies > --- > But definitely I'm not aware for accuracy bragging > But yeah I did it for a couples of months ago now I (realized) that's not for a good chess player behaviors > ___ > But I leave to this a (@A Lichess Moderaor) I believe he give answers for t... Your entire new comment hasn't refuted anything I've said before. There are simply 0% of arguments against my arguments. In fact, everything I've said before still stands. And you've already filled this entire subforum with topics far less appropriate for this forum than mine. And this is the first time I've created a topic in this subforum. And in any case, almost this entire subforum is made up of topics similar to mine, but with a much, much, much less valuable and rare event. My topic stands out colossally, and in a positive way, from all your topics in this subforum, and from almost all the others.

@Silent_Entity said ^

For as far as i can see, this guy is only bragging about himself, leave some room for the others, will you?

He was the one who got offended by the dislikes. I wonder why people judge themselves with those numbers.

@Silent_Entity said [^](/forum/redirect/post/pj5IlSY2) > For as far as i can see, this guy is only bragging about himself, leave some room for the others, will you? He was the one who got offended by the dislikes. I wonder why people judge themselves with those numbers.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.