lichess.org
Donate

My most accurate game ever

I've played almost 2500 blitz games (5+0) on this account, and for the first time ever I got a game with no inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders. Admittedly, it's not a very long game and I was in theory until move 14, but I played the best or second-best move every time! I saw the checkmate at the end from several moves away, and I'm very proud of it even though it's quite simple. Hopefully the Lichess algorithm turns it into a puzzle.

https://lichess.org/OuittYyK/black#50

I've played almost 2500 blitz games (5+0) on this account, and for the first time ever I got a game with no inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders. Admittedly, it's not a very long game and I was in theory until move 14, but I played the best or second-best move every time! I saw the checkmate at the end from several moves away, and I'm very proud of it even though it's quite simple. Hopefully the Lichess algorithm turns it into a puzzle. https://lichess.org/OuittYyK/black#50
<Comment deleted by user>

@Viohl said ^

Very strong game!
It would be nice to know what your opponent was thinking during moves 18 and 19.

You already have 7 puzzles out of your games, but i'm keeping my fingers crossed for you. ;)

Thanks for the kind words!

My guess is that he started considering the sacrifice on move 18, but saw that I can just play ...fxe6 Qxe6 Qd7, when he would have nothing (at least this is what I calculated). I think he went for it after I played 18... Ra2 because the rook was no longer protecting b6. However, I saw that if I played ...Qf5, he wouldn't be able to take on b6 in the future (which he missed).

In fact, if I hadn't played Qxf2+, he would have had full compensation for the piece (Stockfish evaluates it as approximately equal after 25... Kc7 26. Rbb1), so his judgement would have actually been justified.

@Viohl said [^](/forum/redirect/post/fKjtBPaX) > Very strong game! > It would be nice to know what your opponent was thinking during moves 18 and 19. > > You already have 7 puzzles out of your games, but i'm keeping my fingers crossed for you. ;) Thanks for the kind words! My guess is that he started considering the sacrifice on move 18, but saw that I can just play ...fxe6 Qxe6 Qd7, when he would have nothing (at least this is what I calculated). I think he went for it after I played 18... Ra2 because the rook was no longer protecting b6. However, I saw that if I played ...Qf5, he wouldn't be able to take on b6 in the future (which he missed). In fact, if I hadn't played Qxf2+, he would have had full compensation for the piece (Stockfish evaluates it as approximately equal after 25... Kc7 26. Rbb1), so his judgement would have actually been justified.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.