I've played almost 2500 blitz games (5+0) on this account, and for the first time ever I got a game with no inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders. Admittedly, it's not a very long game and I was in theory until move 14, but I played the best or second-best move every time! I saw the checkmate at the end from several moves away, and I'm very proud of it even though it's quite simple. Hopefully the Lichess algorithm turns it into a puzzle.
https://lichess.org/OuittYyK/black#50
I've played almost 2500 blitz games (5+0) on this account, and for the first time ever I got a game with no inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders. Admittedly, it's not a very long game and I was in theory until move 14, but I played the best or second-best move every time! I saw the checkmate at the end from several moves away, and I'm very proud of it even though it's quite simple. Hopefully the Lichess algorithm turns it into a puzzle.
https://lichess.org/OuittYyK/black#50
<Comment deleted by user>
@Viohl said ^
Very strong game!
It would be nice to know what your opponent was thinking during moves 18 and 19.
You already have 7 puzzles out of your games, but i'm keeping my fingers crossed for you. ;)
Thanks for the kind words!
My guess is that he started considering the sacrifice on move 18, but saw that I can just play ...fxe6 Qxe6 Qd7, when he would have nothing (at least this is what I calculated). I think he went for it after I played 18... Ra2 because the rook was no longer protecting b6. However, I saw that if I played ...Qf5, he wouldn't be able to take on b6 in the future (which he missed).
In fact, if I hadn't played Qxf2+, he would have had full compensation for the piece (Stockfish evaluates it as approximately equal after 25... Kc7 26. Rbb1), so his judgement would have actually been justified.
@Viohl said [^](/forum/redirect/post/fKjtBPaX)
> Very strong game!
> It would be nice to know what your opponent was thinking during moves 18 and 19.
>
> You already have 7 puzzles out of your games, but i'm keeping my fingers crossed for you. ;)
Thanks for the kind words!
My guess is that he started considering the sacrifice on move 18, but saw that I can just play ...fxe6 Qxe6 Qd7, when he would have nothing (at least this is what I calculated). I think he went for it after I played 18... Ra2 because the rook was no longer protecting b6. However, I saw that if I played ...Qf5, he wouldn't be able to take on b6 in the future (which he missed).
In fact, if I hadn't played Qxf2+, he would have had full compensation for the piece (Stockfish evaluates it as approximately equal after 25... Kc7 26. Rbb1), so his judgement would have actually been justified.