only 4 inacc, BUT

35 centi, which considers game logic as not strong enought, what did I missed, or had I developed not in agressive enough way?

Thx for like.
This Game is not much differ on stats compared to this one with 86 acc and 44 centi, but here is 5 mistakes and 2 blunders compared to 4 inacc
why is it like that?

Hi @aVague ,

You can find out by yourself the reason why by looking at the evaluations Stockfish gives for the game.
For each move, Black's centipawn loss corresponds to the difference between the estimated evaluation for White and the evaluation after Black's move - or, more precisely: max(0, -W + B).

For example, looking at the evaluations for the 39th move of your first game (ID T6yC7nVX), the centipawn loss is 6.8 - 4.5 = 2.3.

Since your moves between the 33rd and 39th have a fairly high centipawn loss, this is enough to explain the average of 35 centipawns for the whole game (when calculating the average in Excel, I get 0.34).

I don't know if you have seen my answer about accuracy in your topic https://lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/accuracy-is-so-high-but You'll find in it another information about calculations of the accuracy.

@Goran_Pastek said ^

Hi @aVague ,

You can find out by yourself the reason why by looking at the evaluations Stockfish gives for the game.
For each move, Black's centipawn loss corresponds to the difference between the estimated evaluation for White and the evaluation after Black's move - or, more precisely: max(0, -W + B).

For example, looking at the evaluations for the 39th move of your first game (ID T6yC7nVX), th...

Yes Much Thx, but in secon game it's the other, there was much more mistakes and centi should be more