lichess.org
Donate

Oops lol

how to exclude that inner voice, that told Me to move that damn pawn?
lol I often do self destruct thing, I can't say why
Also Game is interesting, will be happy to know your review on game

https://lichess.org/ZzrQhaBL/black

how to exclude that inner voice, that told Me to move that damn pawn? lol I often do self destruct thing, I can't say why Also Game is interesting, will be happy to know your review on game https://lichess.org/ZzrQhaBL/black
<Comment deleted by user>

@Himawari_Nohara said ^

When I have overwhelming material advantage (like Q+N vs a lone king), I give up the knight purposely so I can checkmate with King and Queen. If I were you, I would play Qc1+, allowing white to take my knight.

  1. If you have a lot of material (for example, 2 Queens vs a lone king), give checks until it's checkmate. (Use common sense to decide which check to give!) Don't attempt to play quiet mov...

Yes Much Thx, I shall take it as reflex in My games

@Himawari_Nohara said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Wn29AVp2) > When I have overwhelming material advantage (like Q+N vs a lone king), I give up the knight purposely so I can checkmate with King and Queen. If I were you, I would play Qc1+, allowing white to take my knight. > > 1. If you have a lot of material (for example, 2 Queens vs a lone king), give checks until it's checkmate. (Use common sense to decide which check to give!) Don't attempt to play quiet mov... Yes Much Thx, I shall take it as reflex in My games

i would also play Qc1+

i would also play Qc1+

@aVague

Honestly, by using more time. I have said this literally dozens of times before, but sometimes stubbornness is incurable.

@aVague Honestly, by using more time. I have said this literally dozens of times before, but sometimes stubbornness is incurable.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.