Please help me evaluate this • page 1/1 • Game Analysis • lichess.org

Petter64

I ended up chickening out and taking the repetition, Engine says that the alternative qb4 instead of the qb6 draw would have been good. I felt like he could get some counterplay with his bishop being on the same diagonal as my queen which has quite few squares. How should I approach such a position? Also I maybe had a bit too much respect for the opponent. I forgot to play the position and focused more on the oppponent and the fact that he was stronger. How to fix this? I have the same issues otb.

https://lichess.org/game/cLssnvEiJ560

I ended up chickening out and taking the repetition, Engine says that the alternative qb4 instead of the qb6 draw would have been good. I felt like he could get some counterplay with his bishop being on the same diagonal as my queen which has quite few squares. How should I approach such a position? Also I maybe had a bit too much respect for the opponent. I forgot to play the position and focused more on the oppponent and the fact that he was stronger. How to fix this? I have the same issues otb. https://lichess.org/game/cLssnvEiJ560

RioM

In reality there is no bug for white in this game - but there three fold repetition in won position

Adonis2015

Idek understand this with my -2763 braincells chess brain T0T

kindaspongey

[Event "rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/game/cLssnvEi"] [Date "2026.10.26"] [Black "EgorVS"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1500+0"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 24 Qb6?? (4.77 --> 1.98) Blunder. Qb4 was best. (24 Qb4 Qa7 25 Qa3 Nd5 26 Qa2 Ne4 27 Rf1 Bc5 28 Bd3 Ng5 29 Kh1 Qe7)

tpr

You are 2 pawns up, no reason to take a draw by repetition.