lichess.org
Donate

Rapid Game 2100 vs 1500

@pointlesswindows
@ruyrogers
I don't agree. If you think for long enough you will find it and the move isn't a inhuman one.

@pointlesswindows @ruyrogers I don't agree. If you think for long enough you will find it and the move isn't a inhuman one.

@TapL that's your opinion, so let me repeat mine. I would not find that move in that game. If I knew that there is a tactic then maybe, but it's a different story.

@TapL that's your opinion, so let me repeat mine. I would not find that move in that game. If I knew that there is a tactic then maybe, but it's a different story.

@pointlesswindows Well if you can't find it you can't just assume that whoever finds it is using computer assistance!

@pointlesswindows Well if you can't find it you can't just assume that whoever finds it is using computer assistance!

@pointlesswindows Even at your level you can't just accuse a player who took the time to find it

@pointlesswindows Even at your level you can't just accuse a player who took the time to find it

@TapL at my level they for sure they will miss such a subtle move. I didn't say that you would not find it! You are higher rated and I am surprised that you argue on 1500 rated players way of playing with me.

@TapL at my level they for sure they will miss such a subtle move. I didn't say that you would not find it! You are higher rated and I am surprised that you argue on 1500 rated players way of playing with me.

@pointlesswindows That is such flawed reasoning. Just because they are low rated doesn't mean they can't find it. If they take the time they can definitely find it.

I didn't say that you would not find it!
And I don't know how this came up here.

@pointlesswindows That is such flawed reasoning. Just because they are low rated doesn't mean they can't find it. If they take the time they can definitely find it. >I didn't say that you would not find it! And I don't know how this came up here.

@TapL My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative.

@TapL My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative.

@pointlesswindows

My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative.

I don't how you came to the conclusion that my reasoning is negative! Please point out my "negative" posts.

Basically you are saying: 1500 rated players can't find Re6 no matter what.

@pointlesswindows >My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative. I don't how you came to the conclusion that my reasoning is negative! Please point out my "negative" posts. Basically you are saying: 1500 rated players can't find Re6 no matter what.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.