@pointlesswindows
@ruyrogers
I don't agree. If you think for long enough you will find it and the move isn't a inhuman one.
@pointlesswindows
@ruyrogers
I don't agree. If you think for long enough you will find it and the move isn't a inhuman one.
@TapL that's your opinion, so let me repeat mine. I would not find that move in that game. If I knew that there is a tactic then maybe, but it's a different story.
@TapL that's your opinion, so let me repeat mine. I would not find that move in that game. If I knew that there is a tactic then maybe, but it's a different story.
@pointlesswindows Well if you can't find it you can't just assume that whoever finds it is using computer assistance!
@pointlesswindows Well if you can't find it you can't just assume that whoever finds it is using computer assistance!
@TapL at my level I definately can assume that!
@TapL at my level I definately can assume that!
@pointlesswindows Even at your level you can't just accuse a player who took the time to find it
@pointlesswindows Even at your level you can't just accuse a player who took the time to find it
@TapL at my level they for sure they will miss such a subtle move. I didn't say that you would not find it! You are higher rated and I am surprised that you argue on 1500 rated players way of playing with me.
@TapL at my level they for sure they will miss such a subtle move. I didn't say that you would not find it! You are higher rated and I am surprised that you argue on 1500 rated players way of playing with me.
@pointlesswindows That is such flawed reasoning. Just because they are low rated doesn't mean they can't find it. If they take the time they can definitely find it.
I didn't say that you would not find it!
And I don't know how this came up here.
@pointlesswindows That is such flawed reasoning. Just because they are low rated doesn't mean they can't find it. If they take the time they can definitely find it.
>I didn't say that you would not find it!
And I don't know how this came up here.
@TapL My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative.
@TapL My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative.
@pointlesswindows
My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative.
I don't how you came to the conclusion that my reasoning is negative! Please point out my "negative" posts.
Basically you are saying: 1500 rated players can't find Re6 no matter what.
@pointlesswindows
>My reasonong may be flawed, but your reasoning is negative.
I don't how you came to the conclusion that my reasoning is negative! Please point out my "negative" posts.
Basically you are saying: 1500 rated players can't find Re6 no matter what.
@TapL are you very bored??
@TapL are you very bored??