Rate this game from 0/10

@Toscani said ^

https://lichess.org/Shru4CJV/

4.5/10

I'm searching for the dividing factors that would help filter through the large number of games Lichess has saved for us to review.

When rating a game, what has more weight: Good moves, Domination or accuracy?

I prefer viewing games where lower-rated players defeat higher rated players.

Their wins are rare, but easy to find when using Python to filter through a month’s worth of games.
There’s a lot to learn about how players beat higher-rated opponents, much more than watching an elite player crush a lower-rated one. Players play with purpose, so it's not easy to rate a game without using biases or software to assist.

The following are biased, and include analysis calculations:
Quality (0–10) = 6.5/10
Entertainment (0–10) = 8.5
Instructional Value (0–10) = 7.5
Impressiveness of the win (0–10) = 7/10

Good moves (0-10) = (White 24/36 + Black 21/32) /2 = 66.15% = 6.6/10
Domination (0-10) = (White 55.38% + Black 1.54%) = 56.92% = 5.6/10
Accuracy (0-10) = (White 74.82 % + Black 60.16 %) / 2 = 67.49 % = 6.7/10

https://lichess.org/5g3piqxA/

All it takes is one move to transition from one phase to another. Look at the graph of the analysis. It jumps up on every phase change, like a stair case. The winner is still the lower rated player.

https://lichess.org/Sg98hdbt/

negative 5

@TheMagnusAura said ^

Please don't look at my accuracy it's useless

https://lichess.org/VOxfleog/white

I'd give it 5.5

0.67/10

D02 Queen's Pawn Game: Chigorin Variation

@TheMagnusAura said ^

Please don't look at my accuracy it's useless

https://lichess.org/VOxfleog/white

7/10

I'd probably rate a win with two queens as 8/10 if somebody asked me to rate it