I could made right move with rook check as I did before with knight support and move king, but I moved king straight away , finding it "smart" . it's very bad ability of mine, not being able to stop and think a little. Don't wonder, how I lost a queen, it's for same reason. this reflex is appearing somehow, how to train ability to think about every move regardless desire to find a most Beauty and Original continuation, which disturbs My attention and I miss some obvious moves?
https://lichess.org/game/giLWtLbt/white#106
@aVague said [^](/forum/redirect/post/xvW2GjdM)
> ... how to train ability to think about every move regardless desire to find a most Beauty and Original continuation, which disturbs My attention and I miss some obvious moves? ...
[Event "rated blitz game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/game/giLWtLbt"] [Date "2026.10.23"] [Black "Yakutka74"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "180+2"]
"... For many people with little time for chess the default option is internet blitz, in which the players have five minutes or less for the entire game. I cannot warn too strongly against taking this route if you want to improve, the problem being that playing too many games at a fast time limit will corrupt the decision making process. Instead of playing good moves, a player honed on blitz will look for moves he can make quickly and perhaps bring himself closer to a win on time. ...
... you need to keep to time limits in which the chess position is more relevant than the thinking time, and, ideally, much more relevant. I actually believe that only Grandmasters (2500+) should play five minute blitz, ... 1500 players should have at least 25 minutes thinking time for a game -- or a rough equivalent if they are using an incremental time limits. ..." - GM Nigel Davies (2010)
@kindaspongey said [^](/forum/redirect/post/zFsTQazy)
> > ... how to train ability to think about every move regardless desire to find a most Beauty and Original continuation, which disturbs My attention and I miss some obvious moves? ...
>
> [Event "rated blitz game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/game/giLWtLbt"] [Date "2026.10.23"] [Black "Yakutka74"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "180+2"]
> "... For many p...
I haven't tried to win on time here obvious( I don't care about time at all, that's why I hate bullet, where time matters) all I wanted is original beauty moves and games, and that fast sh*y move is just my reflexes, nothing else, something harmful is inside. I m not that your common player, for which are these rules applied, I always seek for something else, I ve choosen blitz only because of my depth of calculation ability, I can't count too deep.
about a move, I ve said that I made a similar rook with knight support check, all I needed to repeat it , but I couldn't , something disturbed Me
There is nothing that is, 'disturbing you on the inside'; there is only your unhealthy stubbornness and refusal to use more than two of the one hundred and fifty-nine seconds on your clock to convert your winning position without blundering your Rook.
https://www.grammarly.com/. You do not need to use this forever; I used it until I memorized its corrections.
If you are going to use swear words, then either do not censor them, or do not use them.
Instead of making a new thread almost daily ---multiple times a day, sometimes--- will you share your games and ask your exact same question in just one thread? By making an excessive amount of threads, you are making it harder for others' threads to receive attention.
@shadow1414 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Tp9CIYRW)
> There is nothing that is, 'disturbing you on the inside'; there is only your unhealthy stubbornness and refusal to use more than two of the one hundred and fifty-nine seconds on your clock to convert your winning position without blundering your Rook.
>
> https://www.grammarly.com/. You do not need to use this forever; I used it until I memorized its corrections.
>
> If you are going to use swear words...
Yess sir, what 's unclear in My grammar?I thought I m writing smooth enough to understand sense behind sentence.
About topic, do You think I don't have something harmful inside, while when I made this wrong move, I felt something wrong inside and it was a quick reflex. It's no matter of time obvious, it's something influencing nervous system, otherwise I would calmly calculate all moves in every game, and wasn't obssesed with fancy moves without seeing what's risky, and what has real meaning. In such cases, I just recognize fake understanding for true one , and that stimulates Me to make such moves independed of time I waste
@aVague said in #1:
> ... how to train ability to think about every move regardless desire to find a most Beauty and Original continuation, which disturbs My attention and I miss some obvious moves? ...
@aVague said in #3:
> ... I haven't tried to win on time here obvious( I don't care about time at all, that's why I hate bullet, where time matters)
It may not matter as much as it does in bullet, but I think that time nevertheless matters a lot in 3+2 games.
@aVague said in #3:
> all I wanted is original beauty moves and games, and that fast sh*y move is just my reflexes, nothing else, something harmful is inside. I m not that your common player, for which are these rules applied, I always seek for something else,
The GM Nigel Davies comment may not describe you exactly, but I suspect that the essential point is close enough. In a 15+10 game, you could average 22 seconds per move and have enough time for 75 moves. If you average 22 seconds per move in a 3+2 game, you won't be able to make a 10th move. Whatever the details of your motivations, the important point is that a 3+2 game forces the players to mostly look for moves that can be made quickly.
@aVague said in #3:
> I ve choosen blitz only because of my depth of calculation ability, I can't count too deep.
For many of us, it takes practice to acquire the ability to think about a move properly. Proper thinking takes time and you can't get much practice in 3+2 games.
"... Most internet players think that 30 5 [(30 minutes with a five second increment added every move)] is slow, but that is unlikely slow enough to play 'real' chess. ..." - NM Dan Heisman (2002)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627010008/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman12.pdf
If you want to "train" the ability to think about moves properly, you are likely to need games much slower than 3+2.
@aVague said in #3:
> about a move, I ve said that I made a similar rook with knight support check, all I needed to repeat it , but I couldn't , something disturbed Me
Could the "something" have been a rushed (~2-second) desire to protect your b2-pawn after 53...Rh2 ?
@aVague said in #5:
> ... It's no matter of time obvious, it's something influencing nervous system, otherwise I would calmly calculate all moves in every game, ...
Well, you were just telling us that you "can't count too deep". It often takes time and practice for which there is not much opportunity in 3+2 games.
@kindaspongey said [^](/forum/redirect/post/Cr11ZpiU)
> > ... how to train ability to think about every move regardless desire to find a most Beauty and Original continuation, which disturbs My attention and I miss some obvious moves? ...
>
> @aVague said in #3:
> > ... I haven't tried to win on time here obvious( I don't care about time at all, that's why I hate bullet, where time matters)
>
> It may not matter as much as it does in bullet...
for some reason you misunderstand Me completly
move 53 was not desire to protect b2 pawn(and protect from what, there are no threats), I don't do such obvious targets in chess, almost never, I always try to find something original , not obvious, and hate, when obvious move is the only correct one
I wanted to go king a3, then go b3 to protect with check, and then go somehow forward with pawn and king, and move pawns behid forward b pawn.
You mean "somhow" this describe fits for Me, that I want to win on time? really? You don't believe Me or what? see My lately 2-3 months games, I almost never won on time, because I rarely care about, if I didn't I wouldn't choos 3+2, I would 3+0, I ve chosen blitz , because it's not too fast, not too long, that's all, and I don't like diving too deep, if there is no reason behind it, and in mostly games position seems not that complex from start
I ve played rapid yes, but I play it with same is blitz, does it tells you something?
@aVague said in #1:
> I could made right move with rook check as I did before with knight support and move king, but I moved king straight away , finding it "smart" . ...
@aVague said in #3:
> ... about a move, I ve said that I made a similar rook with knight support check, all I needed to repeat it , but I couldn't , something disturbed Me
@kindaspongey said in #6:
> ... Could the "something" have been a rushed ... desire to protect your b2-pawn after 53...Rh2 ? ...
@aVague said in #7:
> ... move 53 was not desire to protect b2 pawn(and protect from what, there are no threats)
Ka3 was your 54th move. Yakutka74 had just played 53...Rh2, appearing to attack the pawn on b2.
@aVague said in #7:
> I don't do such obvious targets in chess, almost never, I always try to find something original , not obvious, and hate, when obvious move is the only correct one
> I wanted to go king a3, then go b3 to protect with check, and then go somehow forward with pawn and king, and move pawns behid forward b pawn. ...
That does not make much sense to me, but perhaps the important point is that, for move 54, your ~4-second thinking was not optimal.
@aVague said in #7:
> ... I almost never won on time, because I rarely care about, ...
Whatever the details of your motivations, the important point is that a 3+2 game forces the players to mostly look for moves that can be made quickly. If one averages 22 seconds per move in a 3+2 game, one won't be able to make a 10th move.
@aVague said in #7:
> ... I don't like diving too deep, if there is no reason behind it, and in mostly games position seems not that complex from start
Well, thinking for more than ~2 seconds might help you to avoid decisions like 5 h3 (~0.4 --> ~-7.2).
@aVague said in #7:
> I ve played rapid yes, but I play it with same is blitz, does it tells you something?
It seems to me to suggest a necessity for both time AND practice using the time.
@kindaspongey said [^](/forum/redirect/post/z6EYmUM6)
> > I could made right move with rook check as I did before with knight support and move king, but I moved king straight away , finding it "smart" . ...
>
> @aVague said in #3:
> > ... about a move, I ve said that I made a similar rook with knight support check, all I needed to repeat it , but I couldn't , something disturbed Me
>
> @kindaspongey said in #6:
> > ... Could the "something" h...
didn't You see when I was thinking 22 + - seconds, and made deadly wrong move? time spending may give nothing, if I feel like thinking I waste time, if I don't -then I don't .it's hard to overcome that start desire to think or think not, when You feel lile You saw enough in position
@aVague said in #9:
> ... didn't You see when I was thinking 22 + - seconds, and made deadly wrong move? time spending may give nothing,
Indeed, it MAY, but the question is whether or not PRACTICE USING TIME, in, for example, 15+10 games, will improve your ability to avoid choices like 5 h3, 53 Nc8, 54 Ka3, and 71 Kd7.