The opening that got a GM banned.. "The banned opening "

But I will say one thing,from your various posts, you're obsessed with the accuracy number!! Ha ha

How can I copy the board in the forum like you?

@chen-rcc said in #12:

How can I copy the board in the forum like you?

Go to your games and then analyze, click share and export then copy the share link.
When you paste that link into the forum it will become a board once you post it :)

@@tonymidtrud said in #13:

Go to your games and then analyze, click share and export then copy the share link.
When you paste that link into the forum it will become a board once you post it :)
Thanks...
I'm stupid.......

waat,Can white Kxh1 on the 24 step?
@tonymidtrud said in #1:

When I first tried this opening I won games on chess.com, but could also lose games. Back then my accuracy was 50+ not really impressive. But playing it whenever I felt like it, my accuracy increased to 80%+ in this game shown here I had 84% accuracy but lost the game. It’s nice to see I am getting better at this ridiculous opening. x)

@chen-rcc said in #15:

waat,Can white Kxh1 on the 24 step?

Yes. But I was trying some counter play with the knight. My board awareness isn’t always good. I have my ups and downs.

@tonymidtrud said in #10:

Thanks :) I played against stockfish.. survived for 32 moves with 90% accuracy. And yes I enjoy myself.

I will try one more last time...

Having a high accuracy is very easy if you blunder into an objectively losing position on move 2. The reason is that accuracy is based on how much you worsen your winning chances. As your winning chances have already vanished, all of your future mistakes won't have much of an impact. Going from bad to very bad will not lower your accuracy as much as going from equal to bad.

You can read up a bit on it here: https://lichess.org/page/accuracy#:~:text=The%20Accuracy%20metric%20indicates%20how,all%20the%20preferred%20Stockfish%20moves.

TLDR: You simply cannot infer good play using this number. It is pretty much worthless in that regard. The meaning you assume is not in there.

@nadjarostowa all games I win, my accuracy is higher than my opponent. All games I lose my accuracy is lower than my opponent.
The game between me and stockfish I had 90% accuracy but stockfish had a 99% accuracy. Don’t tell me accuracy doesn’t matter..
Find me a game where a player that win has a lower accuracy than the opponent that loses. I want to see it with my own eyes that accuracy is useless..

You are again going misrepresent what I said. I said that using accuracy is not a good measure for your quality of play in those cases.

And comparing against stockfish's accuracy is funny, as accuracy uses stockfish to measure against... but yeah, on the lower levels you will have some discrepancies.

And for your curiosity, yes, you can lose with higher accuracy:

Which is rare, but happens.

@nadjarostowa said in #19:

You are again going misrepresent what I said. I said that using accuracy is not a good measure for your quality of play in those cases.

Sorry, poring gasoline into the fire on purpose is not my intention.
This thread was just to highlight the fact that I have become more accurate with an uncommon opening, which to me is improvement as my past accuracy was 50+ but now it’s 80+

This thread was not a recommendation about an opening you should play. If you look at my data base I primarily focus on d4 with white and d6 the pirc defense and c5 the Sicilian defense with black.

I see accuracy as a measurement of how accurate your game is. More accurate is better less is worse. Hence why I made this post.. I am now more accurate with this uncommon opening. The game with stockfish also in this thread I survived 30+ moves with 90% accuracy with the uncommon opening. My record with stockfish was 47 moves with 94% accuracy before checkmate.

In my profile of today’s games I played this opening and won against a 1500+ rated player, he got checkmated..

So everyone who commented in this thread apparently misunderstood what I was saying. This thread was just to let those whom are interested to know I improved my accuracy with an uncommon opening.